7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Patient-reported outcomes for the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study of durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          4070

          Background: TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) is a randomized, double-blind, global, Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (D) in combination with (+) gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). 1 D + GC significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo (PBO) + GC and represents a new treatment option. Methods: A pre-planned secondary objective of TOPAZ-1 was to assess pt-reported outcomes (PROs) for pts receiving D + GC versus PBO + GC. Pts with BTC were randomized 1:1 to D (1500 mg) or PBO, + G (1000 mg/m 2) and C (25 mg/m 2), for up to 8 cycles, followed by D or PBO monotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. PROs were assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30 (C30), and the BTC 21-item module, EORTC QLQ-BIL21 (BIL21). Time to deterioration (TTD) was the primary assessment of PROs; defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first pre-specified, clinically meaningful deterioration (e.g. disease progression). The PRO analysis set included all pts from the full analysis set who completed a questionnaire. Results: Compliance rates for PROs were high at baseline (>81%) and remained high (majority >70% over 28 cycles) for both treatment groups. Baseline scores were comparable between treatment groups. Addition of D was well tolerated, with no significant difference in TTD in D + GC versus PBO + GC for pt-reported symptoms or functioning using either C30 or BIL21 (Table), or Global Health Status/QoL (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–1.12; p=0.279). Conclusions: Addition of D to GC improved OS (Oh D-Y, et al. J Clin Oncol 2022;40(suppl 4). Abs 378) and was well tolerated with no difference in TTD of QoL for pts, supporting D + GC as a new treatment option for pts with BTC. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235. [Table: see text]

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          June 01 2022
          June 01 2022
          : 40
          : 16_suppl
          : 4070
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN;
          [2 ]Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;
          [3 ]Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;
          [4 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University, Seoul, Seoul, South Korea;
          [5 ]Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan;
          [6 ]Chemotherapy Department №17, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation;
          [7 ]Department of Hepato-gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France;
          [8 ]Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China;
          [9 ]AstraZeneca, Warsaw, Poland;
          [10 ]AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA;
          [11 ]Patient-centered solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY;
          [12 ]AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD;
          [13 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4070
          eca121ac-2324-43cc-915a-5e26d48f9d5f
          © 2022
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article