43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Explaining paranoia: cognitive and social processes in the occurrence of extreme mistrust

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 3
      BMJ Mental Health
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Schizophrenia & psychotic disorders, Anxiety disorders

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Paranoia—incorrectly thinking that others are deliberating trying to harm you—causes distress, undermines social interactions and leads to withdrawal. It presents across multiple psychiatric diagnoses.

          Objective

          The primary aim was to determine the extent that cognitive and social processes may explain paranoia. The secondary aim was to identify explanatory factors that distinguished paranoia and social anxiety.

          Methods

          10 382 UK adults, quota sampled to match the population for age, gender, ethnicity, income and region, participated in a non-probability survey. All participants completed a paranoia measure and assessments of cognitive and social processes. Structural equation modelling was conducted.

          Findings

          2586 (24.9%) participants described being mistrustful of other people. 1756 (16.9%) participants wanted help to trust more. 66.7% of variance in paranoia was explained by a model comprising (in descending order of importance): within-situation defence behaviours, negative images, negative self-beliefs, discrimination, dissociation, aberrant salience, anxiety sensitivity, agoraphobic distress, worry, less social support, agoraphobic avoidance, less analytical reasoning and alcohol use. All explanatory factors were associated with paranoia and social anxiety. Ten factors were more closely associated with paranoia than social anxiety, including discrimination, hallucinations, negative images, aberrant salience and alcohol use. Nine factors were more closely associated with social anxiety, including less positive self-belief, an external locus of control, worry and less analytical reasoning.

          Conclusions

          Multiple causes are likely to be involved in paranoia. Cognitive and social processes may explain a high degree of paranoia.

          Clinical implications

          Multiple clear targets for intervention to reduce paranoia are identified.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research.

            C. Bastien (2001)
            Background: Insomnia is a prevalent health complaint that is often difficult to evaluate reliably. There is an important need for brief and valid assessment tools to assist practitioners in the clinical evaluation of insomnia complaints.Objective: This paper reports on the clinical validation of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) as a brief screening measure of insomnia and as an outcome measure in treatment research. The psychometric properties (internal consistency, concurrent validity, factor structure) of the ISI were evaluated in two samples of insomnia patients.Methods: The first study examined the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the ISI in 145 patients evaluated for insomnia at a sleep disorders clinic. Data from the ISI were compared to those of a sleep diary measure. In the second study, the concurrent validity of the ISI was evaluated in a sample of 78 older patients who participated in a randomized-controlled trial of behavioral and pharmacological therapies for insomnia. Change scores on the ISI over time were compared with those obtained from sleep diaries and polysomnography. Comparisons were also made between ISI scores obtained from patients, significant others, and clinicians.Results: The results of Study 1 showed that the ISI has adequate internal consistency and is a reliable self-report measure to evaluate perceived sleep difficulties. The results from Study 2 also indicated that the ISI is a valid and sensitive measure to detect changes in perceived sleep difficulties with treatment. In addition, there is a close convergence between scores obtained from the ISI patient's version and those from the clinician's and significant other's versions.Conclusions: The present findings indicate that the ISI is a reliable and valid instrument to quantify perceived insomnia severity. The ISI is likely to be a clinically useful tool as a screening device or as an outcome measure in insomnia treatment research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Ment Health
                BMJ Ment Health
                bmjment
                ebmh
                BMJ Mental Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2755-9734
                2023
                9 November 2023
                : 26
                : 1
                : e300880
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Experimental Psychology , Ringgold_105611University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [2 ] Ringgold_8955Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford, UK
                [3 ] Ringgold_2152University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Daniel Freeman, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; daniel.freeman@ 123456psy.ox.ac.uk
                Article
                bmjment-2023-300880
                10.1136/bmjment-2023-300880
                10649488
                37945313
                9ec98d15-669f-4787-9f03-81d2bfef1191
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 08 September 2023
                : 26 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: NIHR;
                Categories
                Adult Mental Health
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                schizophrenia & psychotic disorders,anxiety disorders

                Comments

                Comment on this article