17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Deconstructing the relationships between self‐esteem and paranoia in early psychosis: an experience sampling study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          No studies have examined the association between self‐esteem and paranoia developmentally across the critical stages of psychosis emergence. The present study fills this gap and extends previous research by examining how different dimensions, measures, and types of self‐esteem relate to daily‐life paranoia across at‐risk mental states for psychosis (ARMS) and first episode of psychosis (FEP) stages. Furthermore, the moderation effects of momentary anxiety and momentary perceived social support on the association between momentary self‐esteem and paranoia were examined.

          Design

          This study used a multilevel, cross‐sectional design.

          Methods

          One‐hundred and thirteen participants (74 ARMS and 39 FEP) were assessed repeatedly over seven consecutive days on levels of momentary paranoia, self‐esteem, anxiety and perceived social support using experience sampling methodology. Measures of trait and implicit self‐esteem were also collected.

          Results

          Global momentary and trait self‐esteem, and their positive and negative dimensions, were related to daily‐life paranoia in both ARMS and FEP groups. Conversely, implicit self‐esteem was not associated with daily‐life paranoia in either group. Anxiety negatively moderated the association between positive self‐esteem and lower paranoia, whereas both feeling close to others and feeling cared for by others strengthened this association. However, only feeling cared for by others moderated the association between negative self‐esteem and higher paranoia.

          Conclusions

          Different types, measures and dimensions of self‐esteem are differentially related to paranoia in early psychosis and are influenced by contextual factors in daily‐life. This yields a more complex picture of these associations and offers insights that might aid psychological interventions.

          Practitioner points

          • Different measures (trait and momentary) and dimensions (positive and negative) of explicit self‐esteem are distinctly related to paranoia across risk and first‐episode stages of psychosis.

          • Explicit, but not implicit, self‐esteem is associated with real‐life paranoia in incipient psychosis.

          • Anxiety boosted the association of poor self‐esteem and paranoia ideation in daily‐life.

          • Social closeness, but feeling cared for by others in particular, interacts with self‐esteem tempering the expression of paranoia in real life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references100

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.

          E Higgins (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.

            Scales with varying degrees of measurement reliability are often used in the context of multistage sampling, where variance exists at multiple levels of analysis (e.g., individual and group). Because methodological guidance on assessing and reporting reliability at multiple levels of analysis is currently lacking, we discuss the importance of examining level-specific reliability. We present a simulation study and an applied example showing different methods for estimating multilevel reliability using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and provide supporting Mplus program code. We conclude that (a) single-level estimates will not reflect a scale's actual reliability unless reliability is identical at each level of analysis, (b) 2-level alpha and composite reliability (omega) perform relatively well in most settings, (c) estimates of maximal reliability (H) were more biased when estimated using multilevel data than either alpha or omega, and (d) small cluster size can lead to overestimates of reliability at the between level of analysis. We also show that Monte Carlo confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals closely reflect the sampling distribution of reliability estimates under most conditions. We discuss the estimation of credible intervals using Mplus and provide R code for computing Monte Carlo confidence intervals. (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Go/No-Go Association Task

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                neus.barrantes@uab.cat
                Journal
                Br J Clin Psychol
                Br J Clin Psychol
                10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8260
                BJC
                The British Journal of Clinical Psychology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0144-6657
                2044-8260
                30 August 2020
                November 2020
                : 59
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/bjc.v59.4 )
                : 503-523
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Departament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign USA
                [ 3 ] Sant Pere Claver – Fundació Sanitària Barcelona Spain
                [ 4 ] Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM) Instituto de Salud Carlos III Barcelona Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence should be addressed to Neus Barrantes‐Vidal, Departament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Facultat de Psicologia. Edifici B. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain (email: neus.barrantes@ 123456uab.cat ).

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-3212
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-5954
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-1238
                Article
                BJC12263
                10.1111/bjc.12263
                7693052
                32862467
                82a0d845-75f7-4397-997b-1553976fe4ab
                © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 February 2020
                : 21 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Pages: 21, Words: 10701
                Funding
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
                Award ID: PSI2017‐87512‐C2‐01
                Funded by: Comissionat per a Universitats i Recerca of Generalitat de Catalunya
                Award ID: 2017SGR1612
                Funded by: Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports
                Award ID: FPU13/01173
                Funded by: Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)
                Funded by: Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)
                Funded by: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:27.11.2020

                paranoia,self‐esteem,early psychosis,experience sampling,social support

                Comments

                Comment on this article