There is no available vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and no drug with proven clinical efficacy, although there
are several candidates that might be effective in prevention or treatment. Encouragingly,
the response from the research community to the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) has been vigorous. A review of clinical trial registries, as of March 24,
2020, identified 536 relevant registered clinical trials.
1
Of the 332 COVID-19 related clinical trials, 188 are open for recruitment and 146
trials are preparing to recruit.1, 2 The distribution of these clinical trials is
centred in the countries most affected by COVID-19 in the past 2 months, particularly
China and South Korea, with high-income countries in Europe and North America planning
most of the forthcoming trials. Very few trials are planned in Africa, south and southeast
Asia, and central and South America.
The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in resource-poor settings is still
relatively small,
3
but the availability of testing is also low and numbers of COVID-19 cases are expected
to rise substantially in the coming weeks. The capacity of weak health-care systems
to manage a surge of severe pneumonia is limited, and the low availability of appropriate
personal protective equipment (PPE) for front-line health-care staff means that these
key staff are likely to be disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Disruption or
complete breakdown of those health-care systems would result in high direct and indirect
mortality since care of all illness would be affected.
COVID-19 trials should be adequately powered to generate evidence. They need to be
large and well designed. Priority should be given to interventions that reflect the
specific needs of countries and are readily implementable. For resource-poor settings,
that means interventions need to be affordable and available, and adaptable to the
health-care systems and the populations they serve. The adverse impacts of COVID-19
on health and welfare are likely to be considerable in low-income or middle-income
countries (LMICs). Clinical trials, and evaluations of affordable and implementable
interventions of all types—behavioural, organisational, medical, and supportive—are
a priority.
4
On March 18, 2020, the Director-General of WHO announced the launch of the SOLIDARITY
trial, an international study of potential treatments for COVID-19 to be conducted
in Asia, South Africa, Europe, and the Americas.
5
WHO has an important convening role in setting COVID-19 research priorities, facilitating
trials, and coordinating efforts. The WHO COVID-19 research and development blueprint
6
and the R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group will provide guidance and ensure the
necessary coordination and sharing of information. WHO will also have a central role
in reviewing the evidence generated by trials and in producing guidelines. Yet despite
these international efforts, there remain substantial organisational and bureaucratic
obstacles to a rapid research response. Strong political support, effective collaboration,
adequate expertise and resources, and informed guidance will be needed to overcome
these barriers.
Managing COVID-19 will place considerable pressures on health-care systems. COVID-19
results in severe pneumonia and death in approximately 4–5% of patients admitted to
hospital in well supported health-care settings.3, 7 Evidence is needed on pre-exposure
prevention, post-exposure prevention, and patient management. Several countries are
already recommending chemoprevention or treatments for which there is no convincing
evidence of benefit and banning export of these medicines, thereby compromising the
trials needed to establish the evidence. It is possible that none of the current therapeutic
interventions being trialled or recommended will prove beneficial. Large, well conducted
clinical trials are needed urgently to support guidelines on prevention and clinical
management. These trials must not detract from already overstretched health services
and, with travel bans in many places, they must be designed to accommodate remote
initiation and monitoring. There is also much that might be improved in supportive
care and organisation in LMIC settings that could reduce direct and indirect COVID-19
morbidity and mortality. Research is needed now to guide the increasingly difficult
choices that resource-limited health-care systems will face. Yet additional challenges
that relate to ethics review, regulation, manufacturing, clinical trial support and
logistics, open science and data sharing, and equitable and affordable access will
need to be overcome for these studies to be successful.
© 2020 Michele Cattani/Getty Images
2020
Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information
in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre
is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website.
Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is
available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately
available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO
COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form
or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are
granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
The 2013–16 outbreaks of Ebola virus disease in west Africa showed the ethical challenges
of doing research in the context of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
Lessons learned—eg, shortcomings in community engagement, access to basic care, and
front-line worker welfare—will need to be applied to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethics
committees and review boards in many countries are unprepared for applications that
require rapid review.8, 9
Regulatory clearance, including importation of products, is required for many drug
and vaccine trials and, as for ethical review, this can be very slow. Accelerated
clearance pathways for COVID-19 studies such as those recently set up by WHO, the
European Medicines Agency, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency,
and the US Food and Drug Administration are needed in all countries where trials will
be held.
In terms of manufacturing, preparation of clinical trial medicines and vaccines might
require new doses or formulations and placebos. Many LMIC settings will not have ready
access to suitable Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) manufacturers, and those that
do have access may need support in ensuring quality assurance and obtaining regulatory
approvals. This also applies to validated diagnostics.
There is tension between the maximum recommended and minimum essential requirements
to conduct a good trial. In LMIC settings, the infrastructure required to support
clinical trials—eg, preparation of trial products, materials, protocols, case report
forms, databases, statistical support, monitoring, and reporting—is seldom readily
available. Facilities for laboratory measurement and microbiology identification are
often insufficient in these settings
10
and might soon become unavailable because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Essential clinical
trial materials are unavailable in many areas, with PPE to protect staff and swabs
to obtain nasal and pharyngeal samples for virus identification both in short supply.
Some countries forbid export of laboratory samples.
Much of the public and private research is being funded by governments and charities.
These funding agreements must mandate open collaboration and data sharing while protecting
the rights of participants and patients.
11
Open science and data sharing principles need to be applied at all stages of COVID-19
research to accelerate progress. This includes research undertaken by the private
sector. The FAIR guiding principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability,
and Reusability) for data should be implemented, and mechanisms put in place to enable
equitable use and reuse of data.
12
Evidence will need to be shared with WHO for review and development of policies in
line with WHO's normative role.
If interventions are shown to be effective, there should be specific commitments to
ensure that they are made available as soon as possible. There should be commitments
to, and provisions for, equitable and affordable access.
To address these challenges and accelerate the research needed in resource-limited
settings, we propose an international research coalition that brings together existing
multinational, multidisciplinary expertise and clinical trial capacity. The coalition
will synergise with existing initiatives, such as the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator,
the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), and the SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic
Pipeline. Our objective is to use our existing research capabilities to support, promote,
and accelerate multicentre trials of the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of interventions
against COVID-19 in resource-limited settings. For therapeutics, research in such
settings should focus primarily on evaluation of affordable repurposed medicines—ie,
those already developed and approved for other indications—and implementable supportive
measures. If applicable, testing of new diagnostic tools, vaccines, and other potentially
beneficial strategies will be added to the trials.
Our objective is not to control the research agenda but to facilitate it. With partners,
we have four goals. First, we aim to facilitate rapid and joint protocol reviews by
ethics committees and national regulatory agencies, as was done for the Ebola vaccine
trials. Second, we aim to facilitate approvals for the importation of study medications
and materials through agreed coordinated fast-track mechanisms. Third, we aim to ensure
standardised and simple collection of key data, sufficient for robust analysis of
efficacy and safety of the tested interventions. Fourth, we aim to provide a governance
framework to share outcomes before publication.
We propose to facilitate COVID-19 research in LMIC settings by identifying and supporting
established local investigators, local manufacturers, and clinical trial sites. We
will make existing clinical trial support capacity and trial platforms available.
This approach will ensure optimal data gathering, management, security, and analytical
capacity, and will support adaptive designs if necessary and feasible. The platform
will ensure independent data governance and a controlled and rapid data sharing mechanism.
Finally, we will facilitate the establishment and operation of data and safety monitoring
boards.
We are scientists, physicians, funders, and policy makers who have come together in
an international coalition, the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition, to support WHO's
efforts to counter the COVID-19 pandemic. We commit our combined experience, expertise,
and trial capability to accelerate COVID-19 research in resource-limited settings.
We welcome collaboration with organisations ready to contribute existing capacity
to join us at the website of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition.