9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A living systematic review protocol for COVID-19 clinical trial registrations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, a strong response from the research community has been observed with the proliferation of independent clinical trials assessing diagnostic methods, therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. While there is no intervention for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 with proven clinical efficacy to date, tools to distil the current research landscape by intervention, level of evidence and those studies likely powered to address future research questions is essential.

          This living systematic review aims to provide an open, accessible and frequently updated resource summarising the characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trial registrations. Weekly search updates of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and source registries will be conducted. Data extraction by two independent reviewers of trial characteristic variables including categorisation of trial design, geographic location, intervention type and targets, level of evidence and intervention adaptability to low resource settings will be completed. Descriptive and thematic synthesis will be conducted.

          A searchable and interactive visualisation of the results database will be created, and made openly available online. Weekly results from the continued search updates will be published and made available on the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) website ( COVID-19 website).

          This living systematic review will provide a useful resource of COVID-19 clinical trial registrations for researchers in a rapidly evolving context. In the future, this sustained review will allow prioritisation of research targets for individual patient data meta-analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Disease diplomacy:international norms and global health security

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            A Living Systematic Review for COVID-19 Clinical Trial Registrations

            This living systematic review aims to provide an open, accessible and frequently updated resource summarising the characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trial registrations. Weekly search updates of the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and source registries will be conducted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: A living review protocol

              Background: Researchers in evidence-based medicine cannot keep up with the amounts of both old and newly published primary research articles. Conducting and updating of systematic reviews is time-consuming. In practice, data extraction is one of the most complex tasks in this process. Exponential improvements in computational processing speed and data storage are fostering the development of data extraction models and algorithms. This, in combination with quicker pathways to publication, led to a large landscape of tools and methods for data extraction tasks. Objective : To review published methods and tools for data extraction to (semi)automate the systematic reviewing process. Methods : We propose to conduct a living review. With this methodology we aim to do monthly search updates, as well as bi-annual review updates if new evidence permits it. In a cross-sectional analysis we will extract methodological characteristics and assess the quality of reporting in our included papers. Conclusions : We aim to increase transparency in the reporting and assessment of machine learning technologies to the benefit of data scientists, systematic reviewers and funders of health research. This living review will help to reduce duplicate efforts by data scientists who develop data extraction methods. It will also serve to inform systematic reviewers about possibilities to support their data extraction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Res
                Wellcome Open Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2398-502X
                2 April 2020
                2020
                : 5
                : 60
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), Oxford, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [1 ]Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [1 ]Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: I have published with the authors of this paper before, but I do not believe it has affected my ability to review impartially.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6333-0109
                Article
                10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15821.1
                7141164
                32292826
                1be83b19-bec4-490d-b98d-1fd8e88854bc
                Copyright: © 2020 Maguire BJ and Guérin PJ

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 March 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 203794
                This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Discretionary Award to PJG [203794]. This work is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Articles

                living systematic review,covid-19,coronavirus,clinical trials,emerging infections

                Comments

                Comment on this article