17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of SteraMist ionized hydrogen peroxide technology in the sterilization of N95 respirators and other PPE: a quality improvement study

      Preprint
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          The COVID-19 pandemic has led to widespread shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers, including filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) such as N95 masks. These masks are normally intended for single use, but their sterilization and subsequent reuse could substantially mitigate a world-wide shortage.

          Design:

          Quality assurance.

          Setting:

          A sealed environment chamber installed in the animal facility of an academic medical center.

          Interventions:

          One to five sterilization cycles using ionized hydrogen peroxide (iHP), generated by SteraMist® equipment (TOMI; Frederick, MD).

          Main outcome measures:

          Personal protective equipment, including five N95 mask models from three manufacturers, were evaluated for efficacy of sterilization following iHP treatment (measured with bacterial spores in standard biological indicator assemblies). Additionally, N95 masks were assessed for their ability to efficiently filter particles down to 0.3μm and for their ability to form an airtight seal using a quantitative fit test. Filtration efficiency was measured using ambient particulate matter at a university lab and an aerosolized NaCl challenge at a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) pre-certification laboratory.

          Results:

          The data demonstrate that N95 masks sterilized using SteraMist iHP technology retain function up to five cycles, the maximum number tested to date. Some but not all PPE could also be sterilized using an iHP environmental chamber, but pre-treatment with a handheld iHP generator was required for semi-enclosed surfaces such as respirator hoses.

          Conclusions:

          A typical iHP environment chamber with a volume of ~80 m 3 can treat ~7000 masks per day, as well as other items of PPE, making this an effective approach for a busy medical center.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of Five Decontamination Methods for Filtering Facepiece Respirators

          Abstract Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Decontamination and Reuse of N95 Respirators with Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor to Address Worldwide Personal Protective Equipment Shortages During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of Multiple (3-Cycle) Decontamination Processing for Filtering Facepiece Respirators

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                medRxiv
                MEDRXIV
                medRxiv
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
                08 May 2020
                : 2020.04.19.20069997
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab) c/o Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ]Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [3 ]Harvard Ludwig Cancer Research Center and Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [4 ]Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [5 ]Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [6 ]Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
                [7 ]Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [8 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
                [9 ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [10 ]Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [11 ]Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Boston, MA, USA
                [12 ]Brigham & Women’s Hospital Department of Dermatology, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Author Contributions

                Study conception and planning: A.K.C, D.P., H.Y, M.C., F.T.B, R.G., S.H.Y., P.K.S, N.R.L.

                Study execution: A.K.C., H.Y., E.T, D.K., D.T., J.L., H.M.

                Writing: A.K.C, D.P., H.Y, M.C., M.S.S., F.T.B, J.L, R.G., S.H.Y., P.K.S, N.R.L.

                Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team Coordination: D.P., H.Y., P.K.S.

                Guarantors: S.H.Y., P.K.S, N.R.L.

                []Corresponding author: Peter Sorger PhD, Otto Krayer Professor of Systems Biology, Warren Alpert Building 432, Program in Therapeutic Science, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA, 02115, peter_sorger@ 123456hms.harvard.edu (cc: Maureen_Bergeron@ 123456hms.harvard.edu ), TEL 617-432-6901; FAX: 617-432-6990 (not closely monitored during COVID pandemic)
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-8921
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-1693
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4546-790X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-5360
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-8611
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-8058
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-960X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-4560
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-9128
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-1838
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8264-834X
                Article
                10.1101/2020.04.19.20069997
                7273248
                32511480
                3ff28ce8-5365-4a8e-ace1-90063313d09c

                It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19,personal protective equipment (ppe),ionized hydrogen peroxide,sterilization,decontamination,filtering facepiece respirators,n95 masks,powered air-purifying respirator (papr)

                Comments

                Comment on this article