1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Discrepancies between multicriteria decision analysis-based ranking and intuitive ranking for pharmaceutical benefit-risk profiles in a hypothetical setting.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been generally considered a promising decision-making methodology for the assessment of drug benefit-risk profiles. There have been many discussions in both public and private sectors on its feasibility and applicability, but it has not been employed in official decision-makings. For the purpose of examining to what extent MCDA would reflect the first-hand, intuitive preference of evaluators in practical pharmaceutical assessments, we conducted a questionnaire survey involving the participation of employees of pharmaceutical companies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Clin Pharm Ther
          Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
          Wiley
          1365-2710
          0269-4727
          Feb 2017
          : 42
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
          Article
          10.1111/jcpt.12486
          27914099
          39b9b530-ed14-4d3a-804e-fd29c95f808e
          History

          benefit-risk assessment,decision analysis,drug development,multicriteria decision analysis,pharmaceutical regulation

          Comments

          Comment on this article