115
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: a rapid systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Healthcare workers’ mental health problems correlate with organizational factors such as workload and exposure to covid-19 patients

          • Healthcare workers are more interested in occupational protection, rest, and social support than in professional psychological help

          • Interventions focus more on addressing individual psychopathology, which points towards a mismatch between what workers want and need, and the services available to them

          Abstract

          The covid-19 pandemic has heavily burdened healthcare systems throughout the world. We performed a rapid systematic review to identify, assess and summarize research on the mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on HCWs (healthcare workers). We utilized the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's Live map of covid-19 evidence on 11 May and included 59 studies. Six reported on implementing interventions, but none reported on effects of the interventions. HCWs reported low interest in professional help, and greater reliance on social support and contact. Exposure to covid-19 was the most commonly reported correlate of mental health problems, followed by female gender, and worry about infection or about infecting others. Social support correlated with less mental health problems. HCWs reported anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and distress during the covid-19 pandemic. We assessed the certainty of the estimates of prevalence of these symptoms as very low using GRADE. Most studies did not report comparative data on mental health symptoms before the pandemic or in the general population. There seems to be a mismatch between risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes among HCWs in the current pandemic, their needs and preferences, and the individual psychopathology focus of current interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

          Key Points Question What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Meaning These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Highlights • At least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of depression and anxiety. • Almost four in 10 healthcare workers experience sleeping difficulties and/or insomnia. • Rates of anxiety and depression were higher for female healthcare workers and nursing staff. • Milder mood symptoms are common and screening should aim to identify mild and sub-threshold syndromes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature

              Highlights • Subsyndromal mental health concerns are a common response to the COVID-19 outbreak. • These responses affect both the general public and healthcare workers. • Depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported in 16–28% of subjects screened. • Novel methods of consultation, such as online services, can be helpful for these patients. • There is a need for further long-term research in this area, especially from other countries
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curation; formal analysis; software; methodology; project administration; writing - original draft; writing – review & editing
                Role: methodology; writing - original draft
                Role: Validation; visualization; software; project administration; writing - original draft; writing – review & editing
                Role: Methodology; formal analysis; writing – review & editing
                Role: methodology; writing – review & editing
                Role: Roles/Writing - original draft; writing – review & editing
                Role: Roles/Writing - original draft; writing – review & editing
                Role: methodology; project administration; writing – review & editing
                Role: conceptualization; methodology; project administration; writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Psychiatry Res
                Psychiatry Res
                Psychiatry Research
                The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
                0165-1781
                1872-7123
                1 September 2020
                1 September 2020
                : 113441
                Affiliations
                [a ]Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [b ]Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                [c ]Humanitarian Services, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author.
                Article
                S0165-1781(20)32327-1 113441
                10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441
                7462563
                32898840
                289638c9-357b-4916-bed2-378930be5cb1
                © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 5 July 2020
                : 27 August 2020
                : 29 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                occupational health,social support,preferences
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                occupational health, social support, preferences

                Comments

                Comment on this article