5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Self-reported Psychological Distress Among Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What factors are associated with self-reported psychological distress among school-aged children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study including 1 199 320 children and adolescents, the prevalence of self-reported psychological distress was 10.5%. Students who never wore a face mask were at higher risk for psychological distress compared with students who wore a face mask frequently, as were students who spent less than 0.5 hours exercising compared with students who spent more than 1 hour in exercising.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that the prevalence of self-reported psychological distress among school-aged children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively high.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study examines risk factors and prevalence of self-reported psychological distress among school-aged children and adolescents in China during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Schools have been suspended nationwide in 188 countries, and classes have shifted to home-based distance learning models to control the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Additional information is needed to determine mental health status among school-aged children and adolescents during this public health crisis and the risk factors associated with psychological distress during the pandemic.

          Objective

          To assess self-reported psychological distress among school-aged children and adolescents associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study using data from a survey on the mental health of school-aged children and adolescents in Guangdong province, China, conducted by using a stratified cluster random sampling method between March 8 to 30, 2020. To estimate outcomes associated with location of districts, only data from students with internet protocol addresses and current addresses in Guangdong were included. Data were analyzed from April 5 to July 20, 2020.

          Exposure

          Home-based distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Main Outcome and Measures

          The main outcome was self-reported psychological distress, measured using the total score on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire of 3 or greater. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors associated with mental health status. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to analyze the associations of factors with psychological distress.

          Results

          Among 1 310 600 students who completed the survey, 1 199 320 students (mean [SD] age, 12.04 [3.01] years; 619 144 [51.6%] boys) were included in the final analysis. A total of 126 355 students (10.5%) self-reported psychological distress. Compared with students in primary school, high school students had increased risk of psychological distress (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.15-1.23]). Compared with students who wore a face mask frequently, students who never wore a face mask had increased risk of psychological distress (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 2.41-2.79]). Additionally, students who spent less than 0.5 hours exercising had increased odds of self-reported psychological distress compared with students who spent more than 1 hour exercising (OR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.61-1.67]).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These findings suggest that the prevalence of self-reported psychological distress among students during the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively high. Frequency of wearing a face mask and time spent exercising were factors associated with mental health. Therefore, it may be necessary for governments, schools, and families to pay attention to the mental health of school-aged children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic and take corresponding countermeasures to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students’ mental health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

          Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations

            The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic emerged in Wuhan, China, spread nationwide and then onto half a dozen other countries between December 2019 and early 2020. The implementation of unprecedented strict quarantine measures in China has kept a large number of people in isolation and affected many aspects of people’s lives. It has also triggered a wide variety of psychological problems, such as panic disorder, anxiety and depression. This study is the first nationwide large-scale survey of psychological distress in the general population of China during the COVID-19 epidemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature

              Highlights • Subsyndromal mental health concerns are a common response to the COVID-19 outbreak. • These responses affect both the general public and healthcare workers. • Depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported in 16–28% of subjects screened. • Novel methods of consultation, such as online services, can be helpful for these patients. • There is a need for further long-term research in this area, especially from other countries
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                26 January 2021
                January 2021
                26 January 2021
                : 4
                : 1
                : e2035487
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Health Publicity and Education Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
                [2 ]School of Health Services Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
                [3 ]School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
                [4 ]Department of Prevention and Health Care, Shantou Central Hospital/Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shantou, China
                [5 ]Department of Medical Dispute, Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Heyuan, China
                [6 ]Health Education Center of Maoming City, Maoming, China
                [7 ]Department of Health Management, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
                [9 ]Institute of Health Management, Southern Medical University Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: December 8, 2020.
                Published: January 26, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35487
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Qin Z et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Chichen Zhang, MD, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai S Rd, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China ( zhangchichen@ 123456sina.com ); Xuefeng Yi, MD, Health Publicity and Education Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China ( yixuefeng123@ 12345621cn.com ); Ruibin Zhang, PhD, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China ( ruibinzhang@ 123456foxmail.com ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Yi and C. Zhang had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Qin and Shi contributed equally as co–first authours. Drs R. Zhang, Yi, and C. Zhang contributed equally as co–corresponding authors.
                Concept and design: Yi, C. Zhang.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Qin, Shi, Xue, Liang, Lu, Zheng, R. Zhang, Yi, C. Zhang.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Qin, Shi, Lin, J. Zhang, Liang, Lu, Wu, Chen, Zheng, Qian, Ouyang, R. Zhang, Yi, C. Zhang.
                Statistical analysis: All authors.
                Obtained funding: C. Zhang.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Qin, Shi, Lin, J. Zhang, Liang, Lu, Wu, Chen, Zheng, Qian, Ouyang, R. Zhang, Yi, C. Zhang.
                Supervision: Wu, Yi.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant No. 20ZD018 from the Key Projects for Research on Youth Development of Central Committee of the Communist Youth League, grant No. 2020KZDZX1046 from the Special Research Project of Prevention and Control during COVID-19 Epidemic in Universities of Guangdong, grant No. G620369695 from the Key Laboratory Development Project for Philosophy and Social Sciences in Guangdong, grant No. C2020062 from the Directive Project of Medical Scientific Research Foundation in Guangdong, and grant Nos. 31900806 and 71874104 from the National Nature Science Foundation of China.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi201067
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35487
                7838937
                33496797
                1a01a92f-4d0c-4c4c-9985-ddd64537ef03
                Copyright 2021 Qin Z et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 10 October 2020
                : 8 December 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article