3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Minority stressors, rumination, and psychological distress in monozygotic twins discordant for sexual minority status

      , ,
      Psychological Medicine
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals report higher levels of depression and anxiety than heterosexual people. Genetic factors may be a ‘common cause’ of sexual minority status and psychological distress. Alternatively, these may be correlated because of non-genetic environmental factors (e.g. minority stressors). This study investigated minority stressors and distress in monozygotic twins discordant for sexual minority status. This design provides a test of the role of non-shared environmental factors while minimizing differences due to genetics.

          Methods

          Thirty-eight twin pairs in which one was heterosexual and the other was LGB completed a survey. Differences between twin pairs in minority stressors, rumination, psychological distress, and gender non-conformity were examined. Associations between these variables were also tested.

          Results

          Although there were no significant group differences for distress, LGB twins had higher rumination, a vulnerability factor for distress, than heterosexual co-twins. LGB twins also had higher scores than heterosexual co-twins on expectations of rejection, active concealment, self-stigma, prejudice events, childhood gender non-conformity, and lower scores on sexual orientation disclosure. Differences between twin pairs in rumination were positively associated with differences in acceptance concerns and self-stigma. Finally, self-stigma was positively associated with rumination in the full sample of heterosexual co-twins and microaggressions were positively associated with rumination when looking at exclusively heterosexual co-twins.

          Conclusions

          These results support environmental factors as a causal explanation for disparities in rumination between LGB and heterosexual individuals. These factors likely include minority stressors. Rumination may also be associated with minority stressors in heterosexual MZ co-twins of LGB individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Internalized stigma among sexual minority adults: Insights from a social psychological perspective.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of minority stress on mental health and substance use among sexual minority women.

              We examined the direct and indirect impact of minority stress on mental health and substance use among sexual minority women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychological Medicine
                Psychol. Med.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0033-2917
                1469-8978
                July 2018
                November 07 2017
                July 2018
                : 48
                : 10
                : 1705-1712
                Article
                10.1017/S003329171700321X
                29108521
                5ff9393b-bc38-45ad-abb2-451482f329ae
                © 2018

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article