12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Was misst der Wahl-O-Mat : Eine explorative Faktorenanalyse zur Validität des Wahl-O-Mat als diagnostisches Instrument der politischen Orientierung

      1 , 1
      Diagnostica
      Hogrefe Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Zusammenfassung: Der Wahl-O-Mat ist ein Online Tool zur politischen Bildung, das im Vorfeld einer Wahl über die Positionen der teilnehmenden Parteien informiert. Zu diesem Zweck beantworten Nutzer_innen eine Reihe von Thesen und das Programm berechnet die Übereinstimmung der Antworten mit denen der Parteien. So soll die Identifikation mit Parteien verbessert und die Wahlbeteiligung erhöht werden. Die faktorielle Validität des Wahl-O-Mat in Bezug auf die Abbildung politischer Orientierungen wurde bisher auf Basis der Parteienähnlichkeit beurteilt. Diese Studie bestimmt die faktorielle Validität des Wahl-O-Mat der Bundestagswahl 2021 auf Basis der Übereinstimmung von Nutzer_innen und Parteien mittels explorativer Faktorenanalyse anhand von drei Stichproben. Die Analyse ergab eine inhaltlich valide Struktur mit drei Faktoren. Diese Faktoren lassen sich darstellen als eine Dimension, welches ein Links-Rechts-Spektrum repräsentiert, eine rechtsorientierte Populismus- und eine ökonomische Konservatismusdimension. Die Fähigkeit des Wahl-O-Mat, das grundlegende politische Spektrum in ausreichender Komplexität darzustellen, spricht für seine Validität und für den Auswahlprozess der Thesen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          FactoMineR: AnRPackage for Multivariate Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.

            Ideology has re-emerged as an important topic of inquiry among social, personality, and political psychologists. In this review, we examine recent theory and research concerning the structure, contents, and functions of ideological belief systems. We begin by defining the construct and placing it in historical and philosophical context. We then examine different perspectives on how many (and what types of) dimensions individuals use to organize their political opinions. We investigate (a) how and to what extent individuals acquire the discursive contents associated with various ideologies, and (b) the social-psychological functions that these ideologies serve for those who adopt them. Our review highlights "elective affinities" between situational and dispositional needs of individuals and groups and the structure and contents of specific ideologies. Finally, we consider the consequences of ideology, especially with respect to attitudes, evaluations, and processes of system justification.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics: A Dual-Process Motivational Model

              Early theorists assumed that sociopolitical or ideological attitudes were organized along a single left-right dimension and directly expressed a basic personality dimension. Empirical findings, however, did not support this and suggested that there seem to be 2 distinct ideological attitude dimensions, best captured by the constructs of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation, which express 2 distinct sets of motivational goals or values. We outline a dual-process motivational (DPM) model of how these 2 dimensions originate from particular personality dispositions and socialized worldview beliefs and how and why their different underlying motivational goals or values generate their wide-ranging effects on social outcomes, such as prejudice and politics. We then review new research bearing on the model and conclude by noting promising directions for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Diagnostica
                Diagnostica
                Hogrefe Publishing Group
                0012-1924
                2190-622X
                April 03 2024
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut für Psychologie, Fachbereich für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Deutschland
                Article
                10.1026/0012-1924/a000330
                0e675d01-5af2-4590-8259-14a5257e0427
                © 2024

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content64

                Most referenced authors181