1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of an Antiracism Intervention on Racial Disparities in Time to Lung Cancer Surgery

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Timely lung cancer surgery is a metric of high-quality cancer care and improves survival for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer. Historically, Black patients experience longer delays to surgery than White patients and have lower survival rates. Antiracism interventions have shown benefits in reducing racial disparities in lung cancer treatment.

          METHODS

          We conducted a secondary analysis of Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity, an antiracism prospective pragmatic trial, at five cancer centers to assess the impact on overall timeliness of lung cancer surgery and racial disparities in timely surgery. The intervention consisted of (1) a real-time warning system to identify unmet care milestones, (2) race-specific feedback on lung cancer treatment rates, and (3) patient navigation. The primary outcome was surgery within 8 weeks of diagnosis. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using log-binomial regression and adjusted for clinical and demographic factors.

          RESULTS

          A total of 2,363 patients with stage I and II non–small-cell lung cancer were included in the analyses: intervention (n = 263), retrospective control (n = 1,798), and concurrent control (n = 302). 87.1% of Black patients and 85.4% of White patients in the intervention group ( P = .13) received surgery within 8 weeks of diagnosis compared with 58.7% of Black patients and 75.0% of White patients in the retrospective group ( P < .01) and 64.9% of Black patients and 73.2% of White patients ( P = .29) in the concurrent group. Black patients in the intervention group were more likely to receive timely surgery than Black patients in the retrospective group (RR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.64). White patients in the intervention group also had timelier surgery than White patients in the retrospective group (RR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.18).

          CONCLUSION

          Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity is associated with timelier lung cancer surgery and reduction of the racial gap in timely surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer Statistics, 2021

          Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2017) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2018) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2021, 1,898,160 new cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. After increasing for most of the 20th century, the cancer death rate has fallen continuously from its peak in 1991 through 2018, for a total decline of 31%, because of reductions in smoking and improvements in early detection and treatment. This translates to 3.2 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. Long-term declines in mortality for the 4 leading cancers have halted for prostate cancer and slowed for breast and colorectal cancers, but accelerated for lung cancer, which accounted for almost one-half of the total mortality decline from 2014 to 2018. The pace of the annual decline in lung cancer mortality doubled from 3.1% during 2009 through 2013 to 5.5% during 2014 through 2018 in men, from 1.8% to 4.4% in women, and from 2.4% to 5% overall. This trend coincides with steady declines in incidence (2.2%-2.3%) but rapid gains in survival specifically for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For example, NSCLC 2-year relative survival increased from 34% for persons diagnosed during 2009 through 2010 to 42% during 2015 through 2016, including absolute increases of 5% to 6% for every stage of diagnosis; survival for small cell lung cancer remained at 14% to 15%. Improved treatment accelerated progress against lung cancer and drove a record drop in overall cancer mortality, despite slowing momentum for other common cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions

            The Lancet, 389(10077), 1453-1463
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Structural Racism Works — Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                February 14 2022
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [2 ]University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
                [3 ]Greensboro Health Disparities Collaborative, Greensboro, NC
                [4 ]Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [5 ]Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [6 ]Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [7 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [8 ]Department of Public Health Studies, Elon University, Elon, NC
                [9 ]Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
                [10 ]Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC
                [11 ]Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, NC
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.21.01745
                35157498
                fd2b6461-b33d-486e-99ed-b6830eff6590
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article