16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Age Patterns in Self-Reported Cognitive Impairment Among Older Latino Subgroups and Non-Latino Whites in the United States, 1997–2018: Implications for Public Health Policy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          U.S. Latinos are a heterogeneous population with unique characteristics related to individual-level socioeconomic and contextual factors based on nativity status and country of origin. Population aging and greater public awareness of dementia may contribute to an increasing prevalence of self-reported cognitive impairment. However, population-level trends in self-reported cognitive impairment among Latinos are unclear and it is unknown whether there are differences among Latino subgroups. Thus, this study aims to examine heterogeneity in self-reported cognitive impairment among older U.S. Latino subgroups.

          Research Design and Methods

          We used data from the 1997–2018 National Health Interview Survey to document age-specific patterns in self-reported cognitive impairment among U.S.-born Mexican, foreign-born Mexican, island-born Puerto Rican, foreign-born Cuban, and U.S.-born non-Latino Whites aged 60 and older. We estimated hierarchical age–period–cohort cross-classified random effects models (HAPC-CCREM) to isolate age patterns in self-reported cognitive impairment across disaggregated Latino subgroups and U.S.-born non-Latino Whites.

          Results

          The overall prevalence of self-reported cognitive impairment increased from 6.0% in 1997 to 7.1% in 2018. This increase was evident among U.S.-born non-Latino Whites and U.S.-born and foreign-born Mexicans but not other Latino subgroups. Fully adjusted HAPC-CCREM estimates indicated that Latinos were more likely to self-report cognitive impairment than U.S-born non-Latino Whites ( b = 0.371, p < .001). When disaggregated by Latino subgroup, the difference in the likelihood for self-reported cognitive impairment compared to U.S.-born non-Latino Whites was greatest for island-born Puerto Ricans ( b = 0.598, p < .001) and smallest for foreign-born Cubans ( b = 0.131, p > .05).

          Discussion and Implications

          We found evidence of considerable heterogeneity in the age patterns of self-reported cognitive impairment among U.S. Latino subgroups. We also detected large differences in the likelihood for self-reported cognitive impairment between U.S. Latino subgroups compared to U.S.-born non-Latino Whites. These results underscore the importance of differentiating between unique Latino subpopulations when studying population-level trends in cognitive function.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

            (2021)
            This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the challenges of providing equitable health care for people with dementia in the United States. An estimated 6.2 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 15.3 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2020. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $256.7 billion in 2020. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2021 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $355 billion. Despite years of efforts to make health care more equitable in the United States, racial and ethnic disparities remain - both in terms of health disparities, which involve differences in the burden of illness, and health care disparities, which involve differences in the ability to use health care services. Blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Native Americans continue to have a higher burden of illness and lower access to health care compared with Whites. Such disparities, which have become more apparent during COVID-19, extend to dementia care. Surveys commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association recently shed new light on the role of discrimination in dementia care, the varying levels of trust between racial and ethnic groups in medical research, and the differences between groups in their levels of concern about and awareness of Alzheimer's disease. These findings emphasize the need to increase racial and ethnic diversity in both the dementia care workforce and in Alzheimer's clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

              There is increasing evidence that subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in individuals with unimpaired performance on cognitive tests may represent the first symptomatic manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The research on SCD in early AD, however, is limited by the absence of common standards. The working group of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Initiative (SCD-I) addressed this deficiency by reaching consensus on terminology and on a conceptual framework for research on SCD in AD. In this publication, research criteria for SCD in pre-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are presented. In addition, a list of core features proposed for reporting in SCD studies is provided, which will enable comparability of research across different settings. Finally, a set of features is presented, which in accordance with current knowledge, increases the likelihood of the presence of preclinical AD in individuals with SCD. This list is referred to as SCD plus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Decision Editor
                Journal
                Innov Aging
                Innov Aging
                innovateage
                Innovation in Aging
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2399-5300
                2021
                25 September 2021
                25 September 2021
                : 5
                : 4
                : igab039
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Sociology, Aging Studies Institute, Center for Aging and Policy Studies, Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion , Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, Syracuse, New York, USA
                [2 ] Department of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama, USA
                [3 ] Center of Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University , Bowling Green, Ohio, USA
                [4 ] Department of Human Development & Family Science, Aging Studies Institute, Center for Aging and Policy Studies, Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion, Syracuse University , Syracuse, New York, USA
                [5 ] Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, Texas, USA
                [6 ] Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston, Texas, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Marc A. Garcia, PhD, Department of Sociology, Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, Syracuse University, 320D Lyman Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. E-mail: mgarci49@ 123456syr.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-4124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-1955
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-7281
                Article
                igab039
                10.1093/geroni/igab039
                8670720
                34917774
                f7f3d582-3a8e-4c3f-8c44-1236758237f8
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 June 2021
                : 18 September 2021
                : 14 December 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging, DOI 10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: P30 AG059300
                Award ID: K01AG058789
                Award ID: RF1AG068988
                Award ID: P30AG024832
                Award ID: R36AG057949
                Award ID: R01DA039192
                Funded by: National Institute on Drug Abuse, DOI 10.13039/100000026;
                Award ID: R01DA039192
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute, DOI 10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: P30 CA043703
                Funded by: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, DOI 10.13039/100009633;
                Award ID: P2CHD050959
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                AcademicSubjects/SOC02600

                cognitive aging,racial/ethnic data disaggregation,subjective cognitive decline

                Comments

                Comment on this article