1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patterns and trends among physicians-in-training named in civil legal cases: a retrospective analysis of Canadian Medical Protective Association data from 1993 to 2017

      research-article
      , PhD, , MSc, , MSc, , MD PhD, , MSc GDip, , MD, , MD MHSc, , MD MHSc, , MD, , MD MSc
      CMAJ Open
      CMA Impact Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Medico-legal data show opportunities to improve safe medical care; little is published on the experience of physiciansin-training with medical malpractice. The purpose of this study was to examine closed civil legal cases involving physicians-in-training over time and provide novel insights on case and physicians characteristics.

          Methods:

          We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of closed civil legal cases at the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), a mutual medico-legal defence organization for more than 105 000 physicians, representing an estimated 95% of physicians in Canada. Eligible cases involved at least 1 physician-in-training and were closed between 1993 and 2017 (for time trends) or 2008 and 2017 (for descriptive analyses). We analyzed case rates over time using Poisson regression and the annualized change rate. Descriptive analyses addressed case duration, medico-legal outcome and patient harm. We explored physician specialties and practice characteristics in a subset of cases.

          Results:

          Over a 25-year period (1993–2017), 4921 physicians-in-training were named in 2951 closed civil legal cases, and case rates decreased significantly (β = −0.04, 95% confidence interval −0.05 to −0.03, where β was the 1-year difference in log case rates). The annualized change rate was −1.1% per year. Between 2008 and 2017, 1901 (4.1%) of 45 967 physicians-in-training were named in 1107 civil legal cases. Cases with physicians-in-training generally involved more severe patient harm than cases without physicians-in-training. In a subgroup with available information ( n = 951), surgical specialties were named most often ( n = 531, 55.8%).

          Interpretation:

          The rate of civil legal cases involving physicians-in-training has diminished over time, but more recent cases featured severe patient harm and death. Efforts to promote patient safety may enhance medical care and reduce the frequency and severity of malpractice issues for physicians-in-training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

          Data are lacking on the proportion of physicians who face malpractice claims in a year, the size of those claims, and the cumulative career malpractice risk according to specialty. We analyzed malpractice data from 1991 through 2005 for all physicians who were covered by a large professional liability insurer with a nationwide client base (40,916 physicians and 233,738 physician-years of coverage). For 25 specialties, we reported the proportion of physicians who had malpractice claims in a year, the proportion of claims leading to an indemnity payment (compensation paid to a plaintiff), and the size of indemnity payments. We estimated the cumulative risk of ever being sued among physicians in high- and low-risk specialties. Each year during the study period, 7.4% of all physicians had a malpractice claim, with 1.6% having a claim leading to a payment (i.e., 78% of all claims did not result in payments to claimants). The proportion of physicians facing a claim each year ranged from 19.1% in neurosurgery, 18.9% in thoracic-cardiovascular surgery, and 15.3% in general surgery to 5.2% in family medicine, 3.1% in pediatrics, and 2.6% in psychiatry. The mean indemnity payment was $274,887, and the median was $111,749. Mean payments ranged from $117,832 for dermatology to $520,923 for pediatrics. It was estimated that by the age of 65 years, 75% of physicians in low-risk specialties had faced a malpractice claim, as compared with 99% of physicians in high-risk specialties. There is substantial variation in the likelihood of malpractice suits and the size of indemnity payments across specialties. The cumulative risk of facing a malpractice claim is high in all specialties, although most claims do not lead to payments to plaintiffs. (Funded by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the National Institute on Aging.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and Characteristics of Physicians Prone to Malpractice Claims

            The distribution of malpractice claims among physicians is not well understood. If claim-prone physicians account for a substantial share of all claims, the ability to reliably identify them at an early stage could guide efforts to improve care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Medical students' and residents' clinical and educational experiences with defensive medicine.

              To assess medical students' and residents' experiences with defensive medicine, which is any deviation from sound medical practice due to a perceived threat of liability through either assurance or avoidance behaviors. Assurance behaviors include providing additional services of minimal clinical value. Avoidance behaviors include withholding services that are, or avoiding patients who are, perceived as high risk. The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of fourth-year medical students and third-year residents in 2010. Respondents rated how often malpractice liability concerns caused their teams to engage in four types of assurance and two types of avoidance behaviors using a four-point scale (never, rarely, sometimes, often). Respondents also rated how often their attending physicians explicitly recommended that liability concerns be taken into account when making clinical decisions. Overall, 126 of 194 medical students (65%) and 76 of 141 residents (54%) completed the survey. Of the responding medical students, 116 (92%) reported sometimes or often encountering at least one assurance practice, and 43 (34%) reported encountering at least one avoidance practice. Of the responding residents, 73 (96%) reported encountering at least one assurance practice, and 33 (43%) reported encountering at least one avoidance practice. Overall, 50 of 121 medical students (41%) and 36 of 68 residents (53%) reported that their attending physicians sometimes or often explicitly taught them to take liability into account when making clinical decisions. Medical trainees reported frequently encountering defensive medicine practices and often being taught to take malpractice liability into consideration during clinical decision making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CMAJ Open
                CMAJ Open
                cmajo
                cmajo
                CMAJ Open
                CMA Impact Inc.
                2291-0026
                Jul-Sep 2022
                13 September 2022
                : 10
                : 3
                : E781-E788
                Affiliations
                The Canadian Medical Protective Association (McDougall, Zhang, Yang, Neilson, Nuth, Tsai, Lee, Lefebvre, Calder); Faculty of Education (McDougall), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Taylor), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Centre for Education Research & Innovation, London, Ont.; Clinical Epidemiology Program (Calder), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Lisa Calder, research@ 123456cmpa.org
                Article
                cmajo.20220075
                10.9778/cmajo.20220075
                9477539
                36100273
                efcbf757-15e9-43d1-bf4d-16bfffa20786
                © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                1
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                1
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content81

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors177