0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Appointment “no-shows” are an independent predictor of subsequent quality of care and resource utilization outcomes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Identifying individuals at high risk for suboptimal outcomes is an important goal of healthcare delivery systems. Appointment no-shows may be an important risk predictor.

          OBJECTIVES

          To test the hypothesis that patients with a high propensity to "no-show" for appointments will have worse clinical and acute care utilization outcomes compared to patients with a lower propensity.

          DESIGN

          We calculated the no-show propensity factor (NSPF) for patients of a large academic primary care network using 5 years of outpatient appointment data. NSPF corrects for patients with fewer appointments to avoid over-weighting of no-show visits in such patients. We divided patients into three NSPF risk groups and evaluated the association between NSPF and clinical and acute care utilization outcomes after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics.

          PARTICIPANTS

          A total of 140,947 patients who visited a network practice from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2009, and were either connected to a primary care physician or to a primary care practice, based on a previously validated algorithm.

          MAIN MEASURES

          Outcomes of interest were incomplete colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening, and above-goal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels at 1-year follow-up, and hospitalizations and emergency department visits in the subsequent 3 years.

          KEY RESULTS

          Compared to patients in the low NSPF group, patients in the high NSPF group (n=14,081) were significantly more likely to have incomplete preventive cancer screening (aOR 2.41 [2.19–.66] for colorectal, aOR 1.85 [1.65–.08] for cervical, aOR 2.93 [2.62–3.28] for breast cancer), above-goal chronic disease control measures (aOR 2.64 [2.22–3.14] for HbA1c, aOR 1.39 [1.15–1.67] for LDL], and increased rates of acute care utilization (aRR 1.37 [1.31–1.44] for hospitalization, aRR 1.39 [1.35–1.43] for emergency department visits).

          CONCLUSIONS

          NSPF is an independent predictor of suboptimal primary care outcomes and acute care utilization. NSPF may play an important role in helping healthcare systems identify high-risk patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          401-588-1807 , andrewshwang86@gmail.com
          Journal
          J Gen Intern Med
          J Gen Intern Med
          Journal of General Internal Medicine
          Springer US (New York )
          0884-8734
          1525-1497
          17 March 2015
          October 2015
          : 30
          : 10
          : 1426-1433
          Affiliations
          [ ]Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
          [ ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
          [ ]Lab of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
          Article
          PMC4579240 PMC4579240 4579240 3252
          10.1007/s11606-015-3252-3
          4579240
          25776581
          ef78a153-dba0-486e-9d14-e5c104d39d92
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015
          History
          : 5 September 2014
          : 29 January 2015
          : 4 February 2015
          Categories
          Original Research
          Custom metadata
          © Society of General Internal Medicine 2015

          Psychosocial issues in healthcare,Identification of high-risk patients,Health disparities,No-show

          Comments

          Comment on this article