3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Assessment of Cognitive Reserve: A Systematic Review of the Most Used Quantitative Measurement Methods of Cognitive Reserve for Aging

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cognitive reserve (CR) is widely accepted as the active ability to cope with brain damage, using preexisting cognitive and compensatory processes. The common CR proxies used are the number of formal years of education, intelligence quotient (IQ) or premorbid functioning, occupation attainment, and participation in leisure activities. More recently, it has employed the level of literacy and engagement in high-level cognitive demand of professional activities. This study aims to identify and summarize published methodologies to assess the CR quantitatively. We searched for published studies on PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science between September 2018 and September 2021. We only included those studies that characterized the CR assessment methodology. The search strategy identified 1,285 publications, of which 25 were included. Most of the instruments targeted proxies individually. The lack of a gold standard tool that incorporates all proxies and cognitive tests highlights the need to develop a more holistic battery for the quantitative assessment of CR. Further studies should focus on a quantitative methodology that includes all these proxies supported by normative data to improve the use of CR as a valid measure in clinical contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease.

            The concept of cognitive reserve provides an explanation for differences between individuals in susceptibility to age-related brain changes or pathology related to Alzheimer's disease, whereby some people can tolerate more of these changes than others and maintain function. Epidemiological studies suggest that lifelong experiences, including educational and occupational attainment, and leisure activities in later life, can increase this reserve. For example, the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease is reduced in individuals with higher educational or occupational attainment. Reserve can conveniently be divided into two types: brain reserve, which refers to differences in the brain structure that may increase tolerance to pathology, and cognitive reserve, which refers to differences between individuals in how tasks are performed that might enable some people to be more resilient to brain changes than others. Greater understanding of the concept of cognitive reserve could lead to interventions to slow cognitive ageing or reduce the risk of dementia. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cognitive reserve.

              The concept of reserve has been proposed to account for the disjunction between the degree of brain damage and its clinical outcome. This paper attempts to produce a coherent theoretical account the reserve in general and of cognitive reserve in particular. It reviews epidemiologic data supporting the concept of cognitive reserve, with a particular focus of its implications for aging and dementia. It then focuses on methodologic issues that are important when attempting to elucidate the neural underpinnings of cognitive reserve using imaging studies, and reviews some of our group's work in order to demonstrate these issues.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                31 March 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 847186
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Univ Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (FPCEUC) , Coimbra, Portugal
                [2] 2Univ Coimbra, Psychological Assessment and Psychometrics Laboratory (PsyAssessmentLab), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (FPCEUC) , Coimbra, Portugal
                [3] 3Geobiotec Research Centre, Department of Geosciences, University of Aveiro , Aveiro, Portugal
                [4] 4Univ Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine (FMUC) , Coimbra, Portugal
                [5] 5Univ Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB) , Coimbra, Portugal
                [6] 6Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC) , Coimbra, Portugal
                Author notes

                Edited by: Renata Kochhann, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Brazil

                Reviewed by: Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Dorina Cadar, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, United Kingdom; David Eugene Vance, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States; Ricardo Nitrini, University of São Paulo, Brazil; Christian Habeck, Columbia University, United States

                *Correspondence: Joana Nogueira, joananogueira.f@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847186
                9023121
                35465541
                ed08b45e-e3df-4f45-917d-2ccf42cb93d8
                Copyright © 2022 Nogueira, Gerardo, Santana, Simões and Freitas.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 January 2022
                : 07 February 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 9, Words: 6997
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, doi 10.13039/501100001871;
                Award ID: SFRH/BD/136029/2018
                Award ID: SFRH/BD/146680/2019
                Award ID: IF/01325/2015
                Categories
                Psychology
                Systematic Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                cognitive reserve,assessment,measurement methods,cognitive functioning,aging

                Comments

                Comment on this article