120
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Annelida comprises an ancient and ecologically important animal phylum with over 16,500 described species and members are the dominant macrofauna of the deep sea. Traditionally, two major groups are distinguished: Clitellata (including earthworms, leeches) and "Polychaeta" (mostly marine worms). Recent analyses of molecular data suggest that Annelida may include other taxa once considered separate phyla (i.e., Echiura, and Sipuncula) and that Clitellata are derived annelids, thus rendering "Polychaeta" paraphyletic; however, this contradicts classification schemes of annelids developed from recent analyses of morphological characters. Given that deep-level evolutionary relationships of Annelida are poorly understood, we have analyzed comprehensive datasets based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes, and have applied rigorous testing of alternative hypotheses so that we can move towards the robust reconstruction of annelid history needed to interpret animal body plan evolution.

          Results

          Sipuncula, Echiura, Siboglinidae, and Clitellata are all nested within polychaete annelids according to phylogenetic analyses of three nuclear genes ( 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, EF1α; 4552 nucleotide positions analyzed) for 81 taxa, and 11 nuclear and mitochondrial genes for 10 taxa (additional: 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, ATP8, COX1-3, CYTB, NAD6; 11,454 nucleotide positions analyzed). For the first time, these findings are substantiated using approximately unbiased tests and non-scaled bootstrap probability tests that compare alternative hypotheses. For echiurans, the polychaete group Capitellidae is corroborated as the sister taxon; while the exact placement of Sipuncula within Annelida is still uncertain, our analyses suggest an affiliation with terebellimorphs. Siboglinids are in a clade with other sabellimorphs, and clitellates fall within a polychaete clade with aeolosomatids as their possible sister group. None of our analyses support the major polychaete clades reflected in the current classification scheme of annelids, and hypothesis testing significantly rejects monophyly of Scolecida, Palpata, Canalipalpata, and Aciculata.

          Conclusion

          Using multiple genes and explicit hypothesis testing, we show that Echiura, Siboglinidae, and Clitellata are derived annelids with polychaete sister taxa, and that Sipuncula should be included within annelids. The traditional composition of Annelida greatly underestimates the morphological diversity of this group, and inclusion of Sipuncula and Echiura implies that patterns of segmentation within annelids have been evolutionarily labile. Relationships within Annelida based on our analyses of multiple genes challenge the current classification scheme, and some alternative hypotheses are provided.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Limits of Amino Acid Sequence Data in Angiosperm Phylogenetic Reconstruction

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cladistics and polychaetes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy: long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

              We prospectively evaluated quality of life and visual analogue scale pain scores after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in 55 patients with small-duct chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain. The perioperative morbidity rate was 11% and there were no perioperative deaths. Four late deaths occurred (7%), and three patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had prior operative or endoscopic interventions (N = 38) and those who did not (N = 17). Preoperatively there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, etiology, pain score, or narcotic use. Pain score, narcotic use, and symptoms scales improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The group with no prior surgical or endoscopic intervention did significantly better initially (P < 0.007), and the improvements in their quality-of-life and pain scores continued for the remainder of the study. In contrast, quality-of-life and pain scores in patients who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic intervention returned to baseline by 12 months postoperatively and remained poor throughout the remainder of the study. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy appears to work best in patients who have had no prior operative or endoscopic interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Evol Biol
                BMC Evolutionary Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2148
                2007
                5 April 2007
                : 7
                : 57
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Auburn University; Life Sciences Department; 101 Rouse Building; Auburn, AL 36849; USA
                [2 ]University of Osnabrück; FB05 Biology/Chemistry; AG Zoology; Barbarastr. 11; 49069 Osnabrück; Germany
                [3 ]Colgate University; Department of Biology; 204 Olin Hall; Hamilton, NY 13346; USA
                [4 ]University of Potsdam; Institute of Biochemistry and Biology; Evolutionary Biology/Systematic Zoology; Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Golm; Germany
                Article
                1471-2148-7-57
                10.1186/1471-2148-7-57
                1855331
                17411434
                eb7847c1-dfb7-4de9-ae8f-b6e79eb91ae6
                Copyright © 2007 Struck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 October 2006
                : 5 April 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article