9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implications of dominance hierarchy on hummingbird-plant interactions in a temperate forest in Northwestern Mexico

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The structuring of plant-hummingbird networks can be explained by multiple factors, including species abundance ( i.e., the neutrality hypothesis), matching of bill and flower morphology, phenological overlap, phylogenetic constraints, and feeding behavior. The importance of complementary morphology and phenological overlap on the hummingbird-plant network has been extensively studied, while the importance of hummingbird behavior has received less attention. In this work, we evaluated the relative importance of species abundance, morphological matching, and floral energy content in predicting the frequency of hummingbird-plant interactions. Then, we determined whether the hummingbird species’ dominance hierarchy is associated with modules within the network. Moreover, we evaluated whether hummingbird specialization ( d’) is related to bill morphology (bill length and curvature) and dominance hierarchy. Finally, we determined whether generalist core hummingbird species are lees dominant in the community. We recorded plant-hummingbird interactions and behavioral dominance of hummingbird species in a temperate forest in Northwestern Mexico (El Palmito, Mexico). We measured flowers’ corolla length and nectar traits and hummingbirds’ weight and bill traits. We recorded 2,272 interactions among 13 hummingbird and 10 plant species. The main driver of plant-hummingbird interactions was species abundance, consistent with the neutrality interaction theory. Hummingbird specialization was related to dominance and bill length, but not to bill curvature of hummingbird species. However, generalist core hummingbird species (species that interact with many plant species) were less dominant. The frequency of interactions between hummingbirds and plants was determined by the abundance of hummingbirds and their flowers, and the dominance of hummingbird species determined the separation of the different modules and specialization. Our study suggests that abundance and feeding behavior may play an important role in North America’s hummingbird-plant networks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The modularity of pollination networks.

            In natural communities, species and their interactions are often organized as nonrandom networks, showing distinct and repeated complex patterns. A prevalent, but poorly explored pattern is ecological modularity, with weakly interlinked subsets of species (modules), which, however, internally consist of strongly connected species. The importance of modularity has been discussed for a long time, but no consensus on its prevalence in ecological networks has yet been reached. Progress is hampered by inadequate methods and a lack of large datasets. We analyzed 51 pollination networks including almost 10,000 species and 20,000 links and tested for modularity by using a recently developed simulated annealing algorithm. All networks with >150 plant and pollinator species were modular, whereas networks with <50 species were never modular. Both module number and size increased with species number. Each module includes one or a few species groups with convergent trait sets that may be considered as coevolutionary units. Species played different roles with respect to modularity. However, only 15% of all species were structurally important to their network. They were either hubs (i.e., highly linked species within their own module), connectors linking different modules, or both. If these key species go extinct, modules and networks may break apart and initiate cascades of extinction. Thus, species serving as hubs and connectors should receive high conservation priorities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                17 October 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : e16245
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES), Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Morelia, Michoacán, México
                [2 ]Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
                [3 ]Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, Mexico
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-8041
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-5432
                Article
                16245
                10.7717/peerj.16245
                10588686
                37868051
                e8f69791-2ee1-48fb-917a-700ee1d0edc2
                © 2023 López-Segoviano et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 27 February 2023
                : 14 September 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT program
                Award ID: IN221920 and IN213223
                Funded by: Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico for the research carried out at the Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Campus Morelia
                This work was supported by a grant from the UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT program (Project key: IN221920 and IN213223) to MCA. Gabriel López-Segoviano received the postdoctoral grant awarded by the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico for the research carried out at the Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Campus Morelia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Animal Behavior
                Ecology
                Zoology

                ecological networks,aggressive dominance,morphological traits,david’s score

                Comments

                Comment on this article