5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Music and mood regulation during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Music listening can be an effective strategy for regulating affect, leading to positive well-being. However, it is unclear how differences in disposition and personality can impact music’s affective benefits in response to acute and major real-world stressful events. The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to study how music is used to cope with stress, loss, and unease across the world. During the first month of the spread of the COVID pandemic, we used an online survey to test if people from four different countries used music to manage their emotions during quarantine and if the functions of music depended on empathy, anxiety, depression, or country of residence. We found a positive relationship between the use of music listening for affect regulation and current well-being, particularly for participants from India. While people with stronger symptoms of depression and anxiety used music differently, the end result was still a positive change in affect. Our findings highlight the universality of music’s affective potency and its ability to help people manage an unprecedented life stressor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

            While considerable attention has focused on improving the detection of depression, assessment of severity is also important in guiding treatment decisions. Therefore, we examined the validity of a brief, new measure of depression severity. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 was completed by 6,000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-9 depression severity increased, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health care utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-9 score > or =10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity. These characteristics plus its brevity make the PHQ-9 a useful clinical and research tool.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

              Five studies tested two general hypotheses: Individuals differ in their use of emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal and suppression, and these individual differences have implications for affect, well-being, and social relationships. Study 1 presents new measures of the habitual use of reappraisal and suppression. Study 2 examines convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 shows that reappraisers experience and express greater positive emotion and lesser negative emotion, whereas suppressors experience and express lesser positive emotion, yet experience greater negative emotion. Study 4 indicates that using reappraisal is associated with better interpersonal functioning, whereas using suppression is associated with worse interpersonal functioning. Study 5 shows that using reappraisal is related positively to well-being, whereas using suppression is related negatively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 October 2021
                2021
                20 October 2021
                : 16
                : 10
                : e0258027
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
                [2 ] Center for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
                University of Bergen, NORWAY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ Co-first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-3427
                Article
                PONE-D-21-11175
                10.1371/journal.pone.0258027
                8528311
                34669731
                e805ed96-fbec-46a0-8755-23cc1561adf6
                © 2021 Hennessy et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 April 2021
                : 17 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: GRoW at Annenberg Foundation
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Los Angeles Philharmonic Association
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Van Otterloo Family Foundation
                Award Recipient :
                The Brain and Music Program (AH) at the Brain and Creativity Institute is supported by the GRoW at Annenberg Foundation ( https://growannenberg.org/), the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association ( https://www.laphil.com/) and the Van Otterloo Family Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pandemics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Music Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Music Perception
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Music Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Music Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Music Perception
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Perception
                Sensory Perception
                Music Perception
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Perception
                Music Perception
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Acoustics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Anxiety
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Anxiety
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Psychological Stress
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Stress
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Stress
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Music Cognition
                Custom metadata
                All data files will be available upon publication from the Open Science Framework at DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/HC65B, https://osf.io/hc65b/.
                COVID-19

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article