5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of social support and related factors among burns patients

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Burn injuries, as a major public health problem, can lead to high morbidity and mortality. Burns is considered as one of the most devastating injuries globally and the fourth most common injury after traffic accidents, falls and interpersonal violence. Burn injuries can affect human life, such as physical and mental health, functional skills, and performance. Changes in appearance, social isolation, stress, anxiety, depression, low self‐esteem, unemployment, financial burden and family problems can occur in these patients. These burn complications can be exacerbated without adequate social support. This systematic review evaluated burn patients' social support and related factors. A systematic search was performed on the international electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as ‘Burns’, ‘Social support’, ‘Perceived social support’ and ‘Social care’ from the earliest to 30 April 2022. The quality of the included studies in this review was assessed using the appraisal tool for cross‐sectional studies (AXIS tool). A total of 1677 burn patients were included in this review from 12 studies. Mean score of social support in burn patients based on multidimensional scale of perceived social support, Phillips's social support questionnaire, social support questionnaire, social support scale and Norbeck social support questionnaire were 5.04 (SD = 1.59) of 7, 22.06 (SD = 3.05), 78.20 (SD = 15.00) of 95, 82.24 (SD = 13.70) and 4.14 (SD = 0.99), respectively. Factors such as income, educational attainment, burn surface area, reconstructive surgery, quality of life, self‐esteem, socialisation, posttraumatic growth, spirituality, and ego resilience had a significant positive relationship with social support of burns patients. Social support in patients with burn had a significant negative relationship with factors such as psychological distress, having children, life satisfaction, neuroticism and post‐traumatic stress disorder. Overall, patients with burns had moderate levels of social support. Therefore, it is recommended that health policymakers and managers make it easier for burn patients to adapt to burns by providing psychological intervention programs and the social support needed by burn patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS)

            Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a critical appraisal (CA) tool that addressed study design and reporting quality as well as the risk of bias in cross-sectional studies (CSSs). In addition, the aim was to produce a help document to guide the non-expert user through the tool. Design An initial scoping review of the published literature and key epidemiological texts was undertaken prior to the formation of a Delphi panel to establish key components for a CA tool for CSSs. A consensus of 80% was required from the Delphi panel for any component to be included in the final tool. Results An initial list of 39 components was identified through examination of existing resources. An international Delphi panel of 18 medical and veterinary experts was established. After 3 rounds of the Delphi process, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was developed by consensus and consisted of 20 components. A detailed explanatory document was also developed with the tool, giving expanded explanation of each question and providing simple interpretations and examples of the epidemiological concepts being examined in each question to aid non-expert users. Conclusions CA of the literature is a vital step in evidence synthesis and therefore evidence-based decision-making in a number of different disciplines. The AXIS tool is therefore unique and was developed in a way that it can be used across disciplines to aid the inclusion of CSSs in systematic reviews, guidelines and clinical decision-making.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Trouble with the gray literature

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                arman_parvizi@yahoo.com
                soudabeh.haddadi@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Int Wound J
                Int Wound J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1742-481X
                IWJ
                International Wound Journal
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1742-4801
                1742-481X
                23 March 2023
                October 2023
                : 20
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1111/iwj.v20.8 )
                : 3349-3361
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 2 ] Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 3 ] Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 4 ] Razi Clinical Research Development Unit, Razi Hospital Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 5 ] Department of Nursing Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences Esfarayen Iran
                [ 6 ] Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Arman Parvizi MD and Soudabeh Haddadi MD, Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

                Email: arman_parvizi@ 123456yahoo.com , soudabeh.haddadi@ 123456yahoo.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-9176
                Article
                IWJ14166
                10.1111/iwj.14166
                10502254
                36960557
                e69664c3-6cfe-42c3-bffa-d51177028fdc
                © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 10 March 2023
                : 28 February 2023
                : 13 March 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 6719
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.3 mode:remove_FC converted:15.09.2023

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                burns,perceived social support,social care,social support,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article