6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Training Programs for Improving Speech Perception in Noise: A Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding speech in the presence of noise is difficult and challenging, even for people with normal hearing. Accurate pitch perception, coding and decoding of temporal and intensity cues, and cognitive factors are involved in speech perception in noise (SPIN); disruption in any of these can be a barrier to SPIN. Because the physiological representations of sounds can be corrected by exercises, training methods for any impairment can be used to improve speech perception. This study describes the various types of bottom-up training methods: pitch training based on fundamental frequency (F0) and harmonics; spatial, temporal, and phoneme training; and top-down training methods, such as cognitive training of functional memory. This study also discusses music training that affects both bottom-up and top-down components and speech training in noise. Given the effectiveness of all these training methods, we recommend identifying the defects underlying SPIN disorders and selecting the best training approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Animal Communication: When I’m Calling You, Will You Answer Too?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults.

            Cognitive training has been shown to improve cognitive abilities in older adults but the effects of cognitive training on everyday function have not been demonstrated. To determine the effects of cognitive training on daily function and durability of training on cognitive abilities. Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled single-blind trial with 4 treatment groups. A volunteer sample of 2832 persons (mean age, 73.6 years; 26% black), living independently in 6 US cities, was recruited from senior housing, community centers, and hospitals and clinics. The study was conducted between April 1998 and December 2004. Five-year follow-up was completed in 67% of the sample. Ten-session training for memory (verbal episodic memory), reasoning (inductive reasoning), or speed of processing (visual search and identification); 4-session booster training at 11 and 35 months after training in a random sample of those who completed training. Self-reported and performance-based measures of daily function and cognitive abilities. The reasoning group reported significantly less difficulty in the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) than the control group (effect size, 0.29; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.55). Neither speed of processing training (effect size, 0.26; 99% CI, -0.002 to 0.51) nor memory training (effect size, 0.20; 99% CI, -0.06 to 0.46) had a significant effect on IADL. The booster training for the speed of processing group, but not for the other 2 groups, showed a significant effect on the performance-based functional measure of everyday speed of processing (effect size, 0.30; 99% CI, 0.08-0.52). No booster effects were seen for any of the groups for everyday problem-solving or self-reported difficulty in IADL. Each intervention maintained effects on its specific targeted cognitive ability through 5 years (memory: effect size, 0.23 [99% CI, 0.11-0.35]; reasoning: effect size, 0.26 [99% CI, 0.17-0.35]; speed of processing: effect size, 0.76 [99% CI, 0.62-0.90]). Booster training produced additional improvement with the reasoning intervention for reasoning performance (effect size, 0.28; 99% CI, 0.12-0.43) and the speed of processing intervention for speed of processing performance (effect size, 0.85; 99% CI, 0.61-1.09). Reasoning training resulted in less functional decline in self-reported IADL. Compared with the control group, cognitive training resulted in improved cognitive abilities specific to the abilities trained that continued 5 years after the initiation of the intervention. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00298558.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory.

              A growing body of literature shows that one's working memory (WM) capacity can be expanded through targeted training. Given the established relationship between WM and higher cognition, these successful training studies have led to speculation that WM training may yield broad cognitive benefits. This review considers the current state of the emerging WM training literature, and details both its successes and limitations. We identify two distinct approaches to WM training, strategy training and core training, and highlight both the theoretical and practical motivations that guide each approach. Training-related increases in WM capacity have been successfully demonstrated across a wide range of subject populations, but different training techniques seem to produce differential impacts upon the broader landscape of cognitive abilities. In particular, core WM training studies seem to produce more far-reaching transfer effects, likely because they target domain-general mechanisms of WM. The results of individual studies encourage optimism regarding the value of WM training as a tool for general cognitive enhancement. However, we discuss several limitations that should be addressed before the field endorses the value of this approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Audiol Otol
                J Audiol Otol
                JAO
                Journal of Audiology & Otology
                The Korean Audiological Society and Korean Otological Society
                2384-1621
                2384-1710
                January 2023
                10 January 2023
                : 27
                : 1
                : 1-9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hearing Disorders Research Center, Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
                [2 ]Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Zahra Hosseini Dastgerdi, PhD Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Tel +98-09132947800 Fax +98-(311)5145-668 E-mail zahra.au46@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-5878
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-6033
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-0139
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-0938
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2249-0701
                Article
                jao-2022-00283
                10.7874/jao.2022.00283
                9884994
                36710414
                d9a7c8b9-fd3c-43b8-9e4b-55a95d316d78
                Copyright © 2023 The Korean Audiological Society and Korean Otological Society

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 July 2022
                : 26 October 2022
                : 26 October 2022
                Categories
                Review

                speech in noise perception,speech in noise training,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article