9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Surveillance and control of meningococcal disease in the COVID-19 era: A Global Meningococcal Initiative review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review article incorporates information from the 4 th Global Meningococcal Initiative summit meeting. Since the introduction of stringent COVID-19 infection control and lockdown measures globally in 2020, there has been an impact on IMD prevalence, surveillance, and vaccination compliance. Incidence rates and associated mortality fell across various regions during 2020. A reduction in vaccine uptake during 2020 remains a concern globally. In addition, several Neisseria meningitidis clonal complexes, particularly CC4821 and CC11, continue to exhibit resistance to antibiotics, with resistance to ciprofloxacin or beta-lactams mainly linked to modifications of gyrA or penA alleles, respectively. Beta-lactamase acquisition was also reported through horizontal gene transfer ( bla ROB-1 ) involving other bacterial species. Despite the challenges over the past year, progress has also been made on meningococcal vaccine development, with several pentavalent (serogroups ABCWY and ACWYX) vaccines currently being studied in late-stage clinical trial programmes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data

          Background Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae , and Neisseria meningitidis , which are typically transmitted via respiratory droplets, are leading causes of invasive diseases, including bacteraemic pneumonia and meningitis, and of secondary infections subsequent to post-viral respiratory disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of invasive disease due to these pathogens during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods In this prospective analysis of surveillance data, laboratories in 26 countries and territories across six continents submitted data on cases of invasive disease due to S pneumoniae, H influenzae , and N meningitidis from Jan 1, 2018, to May, 31, 2020, as part of the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance (IRIS) Initiative. Numbers of weekly cases in 2020 were compared with corresponding data for 2018 and 2019. Data for invasive disease due to Streptococcus agalactiae , a non-respiratory pathogen, were collected from nine laboratories for comparison. The stringency of COVID-19 containment measures was quantified using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Changes in population movements were assessed using Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports. Interrupted time-series modelling quantified changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to S pneumoniae, H influenzae , and N meningitidis in 2020 relative to when containment measures were imposed. Findings 27 laboratories from 26 countries and territories submitted data to the IRIS Initiative for S pneumoniae (62 837 total cases), 24 laboratories from 24 countries submitted data for H influenzae (7796 total cases), and 21 laboratories from 21 countries submitted data for N meningitidis (5877 total cases). All countries and territories had experienced a significant and sustained reduction in invasive diseases due to S pneumoniae, H influenzae , and N meningitidis in early 2020 (Jan 1 to May 31, 2020), coinciding with the introduction of COVID-19 containment measures in each country. By contrast, no significant changes in the incidence of invasive S agalactiae infections were observed. Similar trends were observed across most countries and territories despite differing stringency in COVID-19 control policies. The incidence of reported S pneumoniae infections decreased by 68% at 4 weeks (incidence rate ratio 0·32 [95% CI 0·27–0·37]) and 82% at 8 weeks (0·18 [0·14–0·23]) following the week in which significant changes in population movements were recorded. Interpretation The introduction of COVID-19 containment policies and public information campaigns likely reduced transmission of S pneumoniae, H influenzae , and N meningitidis , leading to a significant reduction in life-threatening invasive diseases in many countries worldwide. Funding Wellcome Trust (UK), Robert Koch Institute (Germany), Federal Ministry of Health (Germany), Pfizer, Merck, Health Protection Surveillance Centre (Ireland), SpID-Net project (Ireland), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (European Union), Horizon 2020 (European Commission), Ministry of Health (Poland), National Programme of Antibiotic Protection (Poland), Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland), Agencia de Salut Pública de Catalunya (Spain), Sant Joan de Deu Foundation (Spain), Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Sweden), Swedish Research Council (Sweden), Region Stockholm (Sweden), Federal Office of Public Health of Switzerland (Switzerland), and French Public Health Agency (France).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vaccines and routine immunization strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 related disease (COVID-19) is now responsible for one of the most challenging and concerning pandemics. By August 2020, there were almost 20 million confirmed cases worldwide and well over half-million deaths. Since there is still no effective treatment or vaccine, non-pharmaceutical interventions have been implemented in an attempt to contain the spread of the virus. During times of quarantine, immunization practices in all age groups, especially routine childhood vaccines, have also been interrupted, delayed, re-organized, or completely suspended. Numerous high-income as well as low- and middle-income countries are now experiencing a rapid decline in childhood immunization coverage rates. We will, inevitably, see serious consequences related to suboptimal control of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) in children concurrent with or following the pandemic. Routine pediatric immunizations of individual children at clinics, mass vaccination campaigns, and surveillance for VPDs must continue as much as possible during pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Japan

              To the Editor: Spread of multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major public health concern. Effective antimicrobial therapy is a key element in gonorrhea control. However, N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobial drugs, including β-lactams, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones ( 1 – 3 ). Even an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin-resistant, cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae has emerged, and cefixime has now been withdrawn from use in Japan. Best practice treatment is limited to injectable extended-spectrum cephalosporins, such as ceftriaxone and spectinomycin. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae threatens effective disease control. We identified a novel ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolated from a 31-year-old female commercial sex worker; MIC of ceftriaxone for this isolate was high (2 µg/mL). The woman visited a clinic in Kyoto for a routine examination for sexually transmitted infections in January 2009. Although she had no obvious symptoms or signs, a throat sample collected on her first visit yielded a positive result for N. gonorrhoeae by the strand displacement amplification test (ProbeTec ET, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), but a vaginal sample taken at the same time was negative. After 2 weeks, another throat sample was positive for N. gonorrhoeae when cultured on Thayer-Martin medium, and the patient subsequently received 1 g ceftriaxone intravenously. Her pharyngeal sample was also N. gonorrhoeae positive by strand displacement amplification test on the third visit 2 weeks later, and further ceftriaxone treatment was prescribed. However, a culture for test of cure was not conducted because reinfection was considered. A negative result was finally obtained in April 2009. The culture showed positive reactions in oxidase and catalase tests. Gram staining showed gram-negative diplococci. The ID-test HN-20 Rapid system (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) classified the bacterium as N. gonorrhoeae. Susceptibility was determined by the agar dilution method ( 4 ). For this strain, named H041, MIC of ceftriaxone was high (2 µg/mL), and the strain was highly resistant to penicillin G (4 µg/mL), cefixime (8 µg/mL), and levofloxacin (32 µg/mL). However, it demonstrated susceptibility to spectinomycin (16 µg/mL) and reduced susceptibility to azithromycin (0.5 µg/mL). To characterize the ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae H041, multilocus sequence typing characterized the strain as ST7363 ( 5 ), which is the predominant sequence type (ST) among cefixime-resistant clones ( 6 ). N. gonorrhoea multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) was also performed ( 7 ). The NG-MAST strategy uses 2 genes, por and tbpB, for porin and a transferrin-binding protein, respectively. NG-MAST indicated that the strain H041 was ST4220 and contained the por2594 allele and the tbpB10 allele. NG-MAST 4220 is a novel ST. However, the tbpB10 allele is the most frequently observed allele (76.5%) among multilocus sequence typing-ST7363 N. gonorrhoeae strains (n = 81) (M. Ohnishi, unpub. data). Molecular typing suggested that the novel ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae, H041, is closely related to the ST7363 cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae. Therefore, we compared SpeI-digested genomic DNA banding patterns of strain H041 with those of other N. gonorrhoeae strains by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as described ( 8 ). Four ST7363 strains, including N. gonorrhoeae H041, and 4 ST1901 strains (another major ST among cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains) ( 6 ) were analyzed. The banding pattern of SpeI digested H041 genomic DNA was similar to that of other ST7363 strains and indistinguishable from that of cefixime-resistant but ceftriaxone-susceptible NG0207 (Figure). Figure Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain H041 and other multilocus sequence typing (MLST) ST7363 and ST1901 strains. SpeI-digested genomic DNA from ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae H041, 3 of the MLST ST7363 strains and 4 of the MLST ST1901 strains were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A lambda ladder standard (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used as a molecular size marker. We describe the emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae, isolated from a pharyngeal specimen from a female commercial sex worker. At 2 µg/mL, the MIC was 4-fold higher than that of the previously reported ceftriaxone nonsusceptible strain ( 9 ). Our susceptibility testing suggests that only azithromycin and spectinomycin are effective drugs for treating this strain. In this case, eradication was successful, although N. gonorrhoeae colonization of the pharynx may just be tempory because the pharynx is not an ideal site for N. gonorrhoeae growth. From the routine examinations of commercial sex workers during January–March 2009, 40 N. gonorrhoeae were isolated in the clinic, but no other ceftriaxone-resistant strains were isolated. There is no evidence of dissemination of this strain in Kyoto. Three independent molecular subtyping methods indicated that the ceftriaxone-resistant H041 strain was N. gonorrhoeae, and it might originate from an ST7363 cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae clone. There are several possible mechanisms for the acquisition of resistance, including formation of a new mosaic type penA allele as penA-X cefixime resistance and acquisition of an extended-spectrum β-lactamase gene. The H041 strain did not produce β-lactamase in a nitrocephin test. Further molecular analysis is needed to elucidate the precise mechanism of the ceftriaxone resistance of the H041 strain. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae raises concerns for controlling gonorrhea because ceftriaxone is widely recommended and the first-line treatment for gonorrhea around the world. N. gonorrhoeae has a potential to gain an extraordinarily high MIC to ceftriaxone. Surveillance for ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae should be strengthened.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Infect
                J Infect
                The Journal of Infection
                Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
                0163-4453
                1532-2742
                24 November 2021
                24 November 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]PATH, Seattle, WA, USA
                [2 ]Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology & Inflammation, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [3 ]Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
                [4 ]Center for Global Health, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
                [5 ]Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [6 ]Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Eskisehir, Turkey
                [7 ]Center for Genomic Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [8 ]Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, USA
                [9 ]Division of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, a division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [10 ]Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
                [11 ]State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
                [12 ]Robert W Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, 1440 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [13 ]Institut Pasteur, National Reference Centre for Meningococci and Haemophilus influenzae, Paris, France
                [14 ]National Centre of Microbiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
                [15 ]GMI Collaborators: Sotharith Bory, Suzana Bukovski, Josefina Carlos, Chien-Shun Chiou, Davor Culic, Trang Dai, Snezana Delic, Medeia Eloshvili, Tímea Erdos, Jelena Galajeva, Prakash Ghimire, Linda Glennie, Setyo Handryastuti, Jung Yeon Heo, Amy Jennison, Hajime Kamiya, Pavla Křížová,Tonnii Sia Loong Loong, Helen Marshall, Konstantin Mironov, Zuridin Nurmatov, Nina Dwi Putri, Senjuti Saha, James Sim, Anna Skoczyńska, Vinny Smith, Usa Thisyakorn, Thanh Phan Van, Lyazzat Yeraliyeva, Saber Yezli
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Ray Borrow
                Article
                S0163-4453(21)00578-8
                10.1016/j.jinf.2021.11.016
                8611823
                34838594
                d611c291-0774-46c8-9c94-8e7cfe63f0e1
                Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 22 November 2021
                Categories
                Review

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                covid-19,coronavirus,pandemic,vaccination,neisseria meningitidis,invasive meningococcal disease,serogroup,antibiotic resistance,sexual transmission

                Comments

                Comment on this article