105
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New evidence on the tool-assisted hunting exhibited by chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes verus) in a savannah habitat at Fongoli, Sénégal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For anthropologists, meat eating by primates like chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) warrants examination given the emphasis on hunting in human evolutionary history. As referential models, apes provide insight into the evolution of hominin hunting, given their phylogenetic relatedness and challenges reconstructing extinct hominin behaviour from palaeoanthropological evidence. Among chimpanzees, adult males are usually the main hunters, capturing vertebrate prey by hand. Savannah chimpanzees ( P. t. verus) at Fongoli, Sénégal are the only known non-human population that systematically hunts vertebrate prey with tools, making them an important source for hypotheses of early hominin behaviour based on analogy. Here, we test the hypothesis that sex and age patterns in tool-assisted hunting ( n=308 cases) at Fongoli occur and differ from chimpanzees elsewhere, and we compare tool-assisted hunting to the overall hunting pattern. Males accounted for 70% of all captures but hunted with tools less than expected based on their representation on hunting days. Females accounted for most tool-assisted hunting. We propose that social tolerance at Fongoli, along with the tool-assisted hunting method, permits individuals other than adult males to capture and retain control of prey, which is uncommon for chimpanzees. We assert that tool-assisted hunting could have similarly been important for early hominins.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models

          Mixed-effect models are frequently used to control for the nonindependence of data points, for example, when repeated measures from the same individuals are available. The aim of these models is often to estimate fixed effects and to test their significance. This is usually done by including random intercepts, that is, intercepts that are allowed to vary between individuals. The widespread belief is that this controls for all types of pseudoreplication within individuals. Here we show that this is not the case, if the aim is to estimate effects that vary within individuals and individuals differ in their response to these effects. In these cases, random intercept models give overconfident estimates leading to conclusions that are not supported by the data. By allowing individuals to differ in the slopes of their responses, it is possible to account for the nonindependence of data points that pseudoreplicate slope information. Such random slope models give appropriate standard errors and are easily implemented in standard statistical software. Because random slope models are not always used where they are essential, we suspect that many published findings have too narrow confidence intervals and a substantially inflated type I error rate. Besides reducing type I errors, random slope models have the potential to reduce residual variance by accounting for between-individual variation in slopes, which makes it easier to detect treatment effects that are applied between individuals, hence reducing type II errors as well.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park.

            Hunting is often considered one of the major behaviors that shaped early hominids' evolution, along with the shift toward a drier and more open habitat. We suggest that a precise comparison of the hunting behavior of a species closely related to man might help us understand which aspects of hunting could be affected by environmental conditions. The hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees is discussed, and new observations on a population living in the tropical rain forest of the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, are presented. Some of the forest chimpanzees' hunting performances are similar to those of savanna-woodlands populations; others are different. Forest chimpanzees have a more specialized prey image, intentionally search for more adult prey, and hunt in larger groups and with a more elaborate cooperative level than savanna-woodlands chimpanzees. In addition, forest chimpanzees tend to share meat more actively and more frequently. These findings are related to some theories on aspects of hunting behavior in early hominids and discussed in order to understand some factors influencing the hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees. Finally, the hunting behavior of primates is compared with that of social carnivores.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society Publishing
                2054-5703
                April 2015
                15 April 2015
                15 April 2015
                : 2
                : 4
                : 140507
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anthropology, Iowa State University , Ames, IA 50011, USA
                [2 ]Ecology and Evolutionary Biology program, Iowa State University , Ames, IA 50011, USA
                [3 ]Department of Statistics, Iowa State University , Ames, IA 50011, USA
                [4 ]Department of Political Science, Iowa State University , Ames, IA 50011, USA
                [5 ]Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University , Houghton, MI 49931, USA
                [7 ]Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: J. D. Pruetz e-mail: pruetz@ 123456iastate.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-5843
                Article
                rsos140507
                10.1098/rsos.140507
                4448863
                26064638
                d5a73f85-8a4e-4594-bd31-fb01abd44002
                © 2015 The Authors.

                © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 December 2014
                : 19 March 2015
                Categories
                1001
                14
                60
                70
                Biology (Whole Organism)
                Custom metadata
                April, 2015

                chimpanzee,hunting,tool use,sénégal,savannah
                chimpanzee, hunting, tool use, sénégal, savannah

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content80

                Cited by28

                Most referenced authors293