3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors associated with healthcare workers willingness to participate in disasters: a cross-sectional study in Sana’a, Yemen

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Willingness to participate in disasters is usually overlooked and not addressed in disaster preparedness training courses to ensure health service coverage. This will lead to issues during the disaster’s response. This study, therefore, aims to assess healthcare workers willingness to participate in biological and natural disasters, and to identify its associated factors.

          Design

          This is a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to 1093 healthcare workers. The data were analysed using multiple logistic regression with significance level p<0.05. Ethical clearance and consent of the participants were duly obtained.

          Setting

          In three public hospitals that provide tertiary-level healthcare in Sana’a City, Yemen.

          Participants

          There were 692 nurses and doctors (response rate 63.3%) completed the questionnaires.

          Results

          Almost half of the participants 55.1% were nurses and 44.9% were doctors. The study found that self-efficacy was associated with willingness to participate in disaster response for any type of disasters (OR 1.319, 95% CI 1.197 to 1.453), natural disasters (OR 1.143, 95% CI 1.069 to 1.221) and influenza pandemic (OR 1.114, 95% CI 1.050 to 1.182). The results further show that willingness is associated with healthcare workers being young, male and having higher educational qualifications.

          Conclusion

          Self-efficacy has been found to be an important factor associated with willingness. Improving self-efficacy through training in disaster preparedness may increase willingness of healthcare workers to participate in a disaster.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Local public health workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic

          Background Current national preparedness plans require local health departments to play an integral role in responding to an influenza pandemic, a major public health threat that the World Health Organization has described as "inevitable and possibly imminent". To understand local public health workers' perceptions toward pandemic influenza response, we surveyed 308 employees at three health departments in Maryland from March – July 2005, on factors that may influence their ability and willingness to report to duty in such an event. Results The data suggest that nearly half of the local health department workers are likely not to report to duty during a pandemic. The stated likelihood of reporting to duty was significantly greater for clinical (Multivariate OR: 2.5; CI 1.3–4.7) than technical and support staff, and perception of the importance of one's role in the agency's overall response was the single most influential factor associated with willingness to report (Multivariate OR: 9.5; CI 4.6–19.9). Conclusion The perceived risk among public health workers was shown to be associated with several factors peripheral to the actual hazard of this event. These risk perception modifiers and the knowledge gaps identified serve as barriers to pandemic influenza response and must be specifically addressed to enable effective local public health response to this significant threat.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The health of the healthcare workers

            A healthcare worker is one who delivers care and services to the sick and ailing either directly as doctors and nurses or indirectly as aides, helpers, laboratory technicians, or even medical waste handlers. There are approximately 59 million healthcare workers worldwide. Recognizing the vital role played by health care workers as “the most valuable resource for health” the World Health Organization (WHO) had declared the years 2006 to 2015 as the “The decade of the human resources for health.” Do these millions of workers who toil every day to provide healthcare to the ailing population enjoy good health themselves? In other words, are the healthcare workers healthier than their patients? As those who care daily for the sick and injured, healthcare workers are often viewed to be immune to injury or illness. Ideally, the very fact that the health facility is within their reach would make one believe so. However, the picture is not as rosy as it seems. Healthcare industry is one of the most hazardous environments to work in. Employees in this industry are constantly exposed to a complex variety of health and safety hazards in the course of their work. Hazards range from biological exposure to disease causing organisms such as tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or exposure to chemicals such as glutaraldehyde and ethylene dioxide. Apart from physical hazards such as exposure to radiation and noise, there are also ergonomic issues such as heavy lifting and standing for long periods. Long working hours and shift work add to the stress of work. A healthcare worker is in need of protection from these workplace hazards just as much as any other category of workers such as miners or construction workers. The World Health Report 2006 – Working Together for Health – reported a severe healthcare workforce shortage especially in 57 countries, mostly in Africa and Asia. Fear of contracting infectious diseases is primarily responsible for high attrition rates among health care workers. In a report published by the WHO, the disease burden caused by percutaneous sharps injuries among healthcare workers was found to be three million per year. Moreover, 40% of hepatitis B, 40% of hepatitis C, and 4.4% of HIV among healthcare workers were due to needle stick injuries. It is very unfortunate that approximately 1000 healthcare workers die annually from occupational HIV, which can and should have been prevented. Despite this, almost 80% of healthcare workers remain unimmunized (against Hepatitis B) in many parts of the world. Another example of a serious occupational hazard would be that of tuberculosis among healthcare professionals. In the pre-antibiotic era, there were a number of health professionals who fell prey to the disease, however, with the advent of antibiotics, these numbers have substantially reduced. Now, however, we find a resurgence in the number of cases of tuberculosis infection and disease, especially among technicians, pathologists, and physicians. Reasons for this are varied ranging from heavy exposure to the pathogen at the workplace to poor infection control measures implemented at the hospitals and laboratories. This trend is not restricted to infectious diseases alone. Several studies have found that healthcare workers fare no better than the general population when it comes to non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, as well as cardiovascular diseases. We continue to smoke, consume alcohol, eat junk food, sleep erratically, and remain obese with little physical exercise despite knowing the health risks that they pose. This shows that we do not always “practise what we preach.” Several action points come to mind. It is important that we devote adequate time to education – not only of ourselves but of those who work at different levels of the healthcare industry. Our approach to preventive programs, such as vaccinations, requires special attention and may need to be undertaken on a warfooting. There is a paucity of research into the hazards faced by healthcare workers in our country and we need to expand the scope of this research from single centre studies to the analysis of data from multiple centres. This alone will provoke interventions that are designed for large scale implementation. The need of the hour is to prioritize occupational health of health workers and ensure that the workforce is adequately trained and healthy. As humanitarians, it is our duty to help the most vulnerable sections but we should not end up paying the price of our lives for it. The way forward is no longer “Physician heal thyself” but “Physician protect thyself.” Medicus custodiat te!
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Willingness of health care personnel to work in a disaster: an integrative review of the literature.

              Effective hospital surge response in disaster depends largely on an adequate number of personnel to provide care. Studies appearing since 1991 indicate health care personnel may not be willing to work in all disaster situations-and if so, this could degrade surge response. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the state of the evidence concerning the willingness of health care personnel to work in disaster. The aims of this review are to collate and assess the literature concerning willingness of health care personnel to work during a disaster, to identify gaps in the literature as areas for future investigation, and to facilitate evidence-based disaster planning. Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria (25 quantitative and 2 qualitative studies). The current evidence indicates there may be certain factors related to willingness to work (or lack of willingness) in disaster including the type of disaster, concern for family, and concerns about personal safety. Barriers to willingness to work have been identified including pet care needs and the lack of personal protective equipment. This review describes the state of an emerging area of science. These findings have significant implications for community and organizational emergency planning and policymaking in an environment defined by limited resources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                17 October 2019
                : 9
                : 10
                : e030547
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [2 ] departmentSchool of Medicine-SRI , Taylor's University , Subang Jaya, Malaysia
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Weiam Al-Hunaishi; waam59@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-3754
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-030547
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030547
                6803075
                31628126
                d0e83fa5-416c-4e84-aaef-fa41be335b4d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 05 April 2019
                : 04 September 2019
                : 24 September 2019
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                1506
                1724
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                disaster preparedness,willingness,self-efficacy,healthcare worker,intrapersonal
                Medicine
                disaster preparedness, willingness, self-efficacy, healthcare worker, intrapersonal

                Comments

                Comment on this article