21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of COVID-19 on health services utilization in Province-2 of Nepal: a qualitative study among community members and stakeholders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges and threats to the health care system, particularly affecting the effective delivery of essential health services in resource-poor countries such as Nepal. This study aimed to explore community perceptions of COVID-19 and their experiences towards health services utilization during the pandemic in Province-2 of Nepal.

          Methods

          The semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted among purposively selected participants ( n = 41) from a mix of rural and urban settings in all districts ( n = 8) of the Province 2 of Nepal. Virtual interviews were conducted between July and August 2020 in local languages. The data were analyzed using thematic network analysis in NVivo 12 Pro.

          Results

          The findings of this research are categorized into four global themes: i) Community and stakeholders’ perceptions towards COVID-19; ii) Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on health services delivery; iii) Community perceptions and experiences of health services during COVID-19; and iv) COVID-19: testing, isolation, and quarantine services. Most participants shared their experience of being worried and anxious about COVID-19 and reported a lack of awareness, misinformation, and stigma as major factors contributing to the spread of COVID-19. Maternity services, immunization, and supply of essential medicine were found to be the most affected areas of health care delivery during the lockdown. Participants reported that the interruptions in health services were mostly due to the closure of health services at local health care facilities, limited affordability, and involvement of private health sectors during the pandemic, fears of COVID-19 transmission among health care workers and within health centers, and disruption of transportation services. In addition, the participants expressed frustrations on poor testing, isolation, and quarantine services related to COVID-19, and poor accountability from the government at all levels towards health services continuation/management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Conclusions

          This study found that essential health services were severely affected during the COVID-19 pandemic in all districts of Province-2. It is critical to expand and continue the service coverage, and its quality (even more during pandemics), as well as increase public-private sector engagement to ensure the essential health services are available for the population.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06176-y.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019

          Summary In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A previously unknown betacoronavirus was discovered through the use of unbiased sequencing in samples from patients with pneumonia. Human airway epithelial cells were used to isolate a novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV, which formed a clade within the subgenus sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily. Different from both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, 2019-nCoV is the seventh member of the family of coronaviruses that infect humans. Enhanced surveillance and further investigation are ongoing. (Funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dsingh3797@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                24 February 2021
                24 February 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 174
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.444739.9, ISNI 0000 0000 9021 3093, Department of Public Health, Asian College for Advance Studies, , Purbanchal University, ; Satdobato, Lalitpur, Nepal
                [2 ]Research and Innovation Section, Southeast Asia Development Actions Network (SADAN), Lalitpur, Nepal
                [3 ]Research Section, Swadesh Development Foundation (SDF), Siraha, Province-2 Nepal
                [4 ]Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Armed Police Force Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
                [5 ]Program Section, Bagmati Welfare Society Nepal, Sarlahi, Province-2 Nepal
                [6 ]GRID grid.127050.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0249 951X, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, , Canterbury Christ Church University, ; Kent, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.10223.32, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0490, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, , Mahidol University, ; Bangkok, Thailand
                [8 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-9476
                Article
                6176
                10.1186/s12913-021-06176-y
                7903406
                33627115
                cf3136d4-2a70-4fd6-9902-55ee7117f8ef
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 9 December 2020
                : 15 February 2021
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                covid-19,health services,health care utilization,pandemic,community experiences,nepal

                Comments

                Comment on this article