5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The prognostic value of red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are known inflammatory indices. Elevated values are found in many cancers and may be associated with a poor prognosis. The article aimed to assess the impact of RDW, NLR, and PLR on overall survival (OS) of patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT).

          Materials and methods

          This retrospective study includes 208 patients treated for oropharyngeal cancer with definitive RT or RT combined with neoadjuvant or concurrent systemic therapy, at one institution between 2004 and 2014. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method, log-rank testing, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for the analysis.

          Results

          The OS was significantly higher in RDW ≤ 13.8% (p = 0.001) and NLR ≤ 2.099 (p = 0.016) groups. The RDW index was characterized by the highest discriminatory ability [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.67], closely followed by NLR (AUC = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.50–0.65). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, RDW [hazard ratio (HR): 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12–1.47, p < 0.001] and NLR (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.18, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of death. In the multivariate analysis, among the analyzed indices, only NLR was significantly associated with survival (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.29, p = 0.012).

          Conclusions

          In the study, only NLR proved to be an independent predictor of OS. However, its clinical value is limited due to the relatively low sensitivity and specificity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Index for rating diagnostic tests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab.

            Immunotherapy with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) antibody nivolumab has changed the field of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Nivolumab shows better outcome compared to standard second line chemotherapy, but reliable prognostic markers are lacking. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of host inflammation and associated with worse overall survival (OS) in several tumor types, but have not been analysed extensively in lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Red blood cell distribution width: A simple parameter with multiple clinical applications.

              The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a simple and inexpensive parameter, which reflects the degree of heterogeneity of erythrocyte volume (conventionally known as anisocytosis), and is traditionally used in laboratory hematology for differential diagnosis of anemias. Nonetheless, recent evidence attests that anisocytosis is commonplace in human disorders such as cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, cancer, diabetes, community-acquired pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver and kidney failure, as well as in other acute or chronic conditions. Despite some demographic and analytical issues related to the routine assessment that may impair its clinical usefulness, an increased RDW has a high negative predictive value for diagnosing a variety of disorders, but also conveys important information for short- and long-term prognosis. Even more importantly, the value of RDW is now being regarded as a strong and independent risk factor for death in the general population. Although it has not been definitely established whether an increased value of RDW is a risk factor or should only be considered an epiphenomenon of an underlying biological and metabolic imbalance, it seems reasonable to suggest that the assessment of this parameter should be broadened far beyond the differential diagnosis of anemias. An increased RDW mirrors a profound deregulation of erythrocyte homeostasis involving both impaired erythropoiesis and abnormal red blood cell survival, which may be attributed to a variety of underlying metabolic abnormalities such as shortening of telomere length, oxidative stress, inflammation, poor nutritional status, dyslipidemia, hypertension, erythrocyte fragmentation and alteration of erythropoietin function. As such, the aim of this article is to provide general information about RDW and its routine assessment, to review the most relevant implications in health and disease and give some insights about its potential clinical applications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
                Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
                Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
                Via Medica
                1507-1367
                2083-4640
                2021
                30 December 2021
                : 26
                : 6
                : 1010-1018
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
                [2 ]Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, Ł;ódź, Poland
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Emilia Staniewska, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, ul. Wybrzeża Armii Krajowej 15, 44–102 Gliwice, Poland; e-mail: em.staniewska@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                rpor-26-6-1010
                10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0126
                8726441
                34992875
                c45d5b96-f1e7-4bb8-aae5-f014f2487a23
                © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre

                This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially

                History
                : 07 September 2021
                : 07 October 2021
                Categories
                Research Paper

                radiotherapy,oropharyngeal cancer,rdw,nlr,plr
                radiotherapy, oropharyngeal cancer, rdw, nlr, plr

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content559

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors368