10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Food insecurity and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Food security has been suggested to be a risk factor for depression, stress and anxiety. We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of available publications to examine these associations further.

          Design:

          Relevant studies were identified by searching Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases up to January 2019.

          Setting:

          OR was pooled using a random-effects model. Standard methods were used for assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias.

          Participants:

          Data were available from nineteen studies with 372 143 individual participants from ten different countries that were pooled for the meta-analysis.

          Results:

          The results showed there was a positive relationship between food insecurity (FI) and risk of depression (OR = 1·40; 95 % CI: 1·30, 1·58) and stress (OR = 1·34; 95 % CI: 1·24, 1·44) but not anxiety. Subgroup analysis by age showed that subjects older than ≥65 years exhibited a higher risk of depression (OR = 1·75; 95 % CI: 1·20, 2·56) than younger participants (OR = 1·34; 95 % CI: 1·20, 1·50), as well as a greater risk of depression in men (OR = 1·42; 95 % CI: 1·17, 1·72) than women (OR = 1·30; 95 % CI: 1·16, 1·46). Finally, subgroup analysis according to geographical location illustrated that food insecure households living in North America had the highest risk of stress and anxiety.

          Conclusions:

          The evidence from this meta-analysis suggests that FI has a significant effect on the likelihood of being stressed or depressed. This indicates that health care services, which alleviate FI, would also promote holistic well-being in adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Public Health Nutrition
                Public Health Nutr.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1368-9800
                1475-2727
                July 2020
                March 16 2020
                July 2020
                : 23
                : 10
                : 1778-1790
                Article
                10.1017/S136898001900435X
                32174292
                c3dc552b-e303-4704-9d5a-dbcf535ac64a
                © 2020

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article