14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation: impact of a screening and decolonisation programme

      , , , ,
      Journal of Infection Prevention
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d1707273e149">Patients in care homes are often at ‘high risk’ of being methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) colonised. Here we report the prevalence of MRSA, the effect of MRSA screening and decolonisation in Wolverhampton care-home residents. Eighty-two care homes (1665 residents) were screened for MRSA, three times at 6-monthly intervals (referred to as phases one, two and three). Screening and decolonisation of MRSA-colonised residents led to a reduction in the prevalence of MRSA from 8.7% in phase one, 6.3% in phase 2 and 4.7% in phase three. Overall, the study suggests that care-home facilities in Wolverhampton are a significant reservoir for MRSA; screening and decolonisation has reduced the risk to residents going for procedures and has indirectly impacted on MRSA rates in the acute Trust. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Infection Prevention
          Journal of Infection Prevention
          SAGE Publications
          1757-1774
          1757-1782
          October 19 2016
          November 01 2016
          August 04 2016
          November 01 2016
          : 17
          : 6
          : 294-297
          Article
          10.1177/1757177416661406
          5102085
          28989493
          b7bb967a-3d81-4e01-b603-db69d7656575
          © 2016
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article