12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
4 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of risk perceptions and belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 pandemic-related behaviours

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, conspiracy theories about the virus spread rapidly, and whilst governments across the globe put in place different restrictions and guidelines to contain the pandemic, these were not universally adhered to. This research examined the association between pandemic related risk perceptions, belief in conspiracy theories, and compliance with COVID-19 public guidelines amongst a UK sample ( n = 368). Participants rated their level of concern for a series of potential risks during the pandemic (to the economy, personal health, freedom, media integrity and health risk to others). Participants also rated their level of belief in different conspiracy theories and self-reported their behaviour during the first UK lockdown. Mediational analyses showed that stronger belief in conspiracy theories was associated with perceptions of lower risk to health and higher risk to the economy and freedom, which in turn were associated with lower compliance with COVID-19 related governmental guidelines. Perception of information transparency risks did not mediate the association between belief in conspiracy theories and compliant behaviours. These results highlight the key role that risk perception may play in translating belief in conspiracy theories into low compliance with governmental COVID-19 related guidelines. Our findings suggest new patterns with respect to the relationship between conspiracy theory adherence and salience of different risk perceptions amidst the pandemic, which could have implications for the development of public health messaging and communication interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references102

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 February 2022
                2022
                8 February 2022
                : 17
                : 2
                : e0263716
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                University of Haifa, ISRAEL
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ MV and ACL also contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-1676
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0590-4204
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7454-7744
                Article
                PONE-D-21-30406
                10.1371/journal.pone.0263716
                8824369
                35134100
                b69f4a37-e816-48c9-baa7-efcf705327d8
                © 2022 Hughes et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 September 2021
                : 25 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 20
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pandemics
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Health Economics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Economics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Virus Testing
                Social Sciences
                Political Science
                Political Theory
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data files are available from the OSF database (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JD59B).
                COVID-19

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article