25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of discrete event simulation in health care: a systematic review

      research-article
      BMC Health Services Research
      BioMed Central
      Systematic review, Discrete event simulation, Health care management

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The objective was to explore the current advances and extent of DES (Discrete Event Simulation) applied to assisting with health decision making, as well as to categorize the wide spectrum of health-related topics where DES was applied.

          Methods

          A systematic review was conducted of the literature published over the last two decades. Original research articles were included and reviewed if they concentrated on the topic of DES technique applied to health care management with model frameworks explicitly demonstrated. No restriction regarding the settings of DES application was applied.

          Results

          A total of 211 papers met the predefined inclusion criteria. The number of publications included increased significantly especially after 2010.101 papers (48%) stated explicitly disease areas targeted, the most frequently modeled of which are related to circulatory system, nervous system and Neoplasm. The DES applications were distributed unevenly into 4 major classes: health and care systems operation (HCSO) (65%), disease progression modeling (DPM) (28%), screening modeling (SM) (5%) and health behavior modeling (HBM) (2%). More than 68% of HCSO by DES were focused on specific problems in individual units. However, more attempts at modeling highly integrated health service systems as well as some new trends were identified.

          Conclusions

          DES technique has been an effective tool to approach a wide variety of health care issues. Among all DES applications in health care, health system operations research occupied the most considerable proportion and increased most significantly. Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) was the second most common topic for DES in health care, but with stable rather than increasing numbers of publications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: A survey

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.

              Many guidelines recommend screening mammography every 1-2 years for women older than 40 years; more than 70% of women now participate in routine screening. No studies have examined the societal impact of screening practices over the past decade in the United States on costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We performed a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis comparing actual and alternative screening mammography scenarios. We used a discrete-event simulation model of breast cancer epidemiology to estimate the costs and the number of QALYs that were associated with observed screening mammography patterns in the United States from 1990 to 2000 for women aged 40 years or older. We also estimated costs and QALYS for no screening and for 64 alternative screening scenarios. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were computed. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key parameters. Actual U.S. screening patterns from 1990 to 2000 accrued 947.5 million QALYs and cost $166 billion over the lifetimes of the screened women, resulting in a gain of 1.7 million QALYs for an additional cost of $62.5 billion compared with no screening. Among those polices that were not dominated--i.e., for which no alternative existed that produced more QALYs for lower costs--screening all women aged 40-80 years annually per some U.S. guidelines was the most expensive option, costing $58,000 per additional QALY gained compared with the next most costly alternative, screening all women aged 45-80 years annually. Many alternative screening scenarios generated more QALYs for less cost (with savings up to $6 billion) than actual screening patterns over the study period. Sensitivity analysis showed that conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of screening mammography policies were highly sensitive to small, short-term detrimental effects on quality of life from the screening test itself. Choosing among the efficient policies to guide current screening recommendations requires consideration of costs to promote participation in screening and measurement of acute quality-of-life effects of mammography.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (49) 421-218-68836 , Xiange@uni-bremen.de
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                4 September 2018
                4 September 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 687
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0001 2297 4381, GRID grid.7704.4, Department of Health Care Management, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Health sciences, , University of Bremen, ; Grazer Str. 2a, 28359 Bremen, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-0178
                Article
                3456
                10.1186/s12913-018-3456-4
                6123911
                30180848
                a88ef0ae-8d7a-4e1b-9361-3b60a42dbcf2
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 May 2018
                : 8 August 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004543, China Scholarship Council;
                Award ID: 201608080200
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                systematic review,discrete event simulation,health care management
                Health & Social care
                systematic review, discrete event simulation, health care management

                Comments

                Comment on this article