8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Southern high-latitude warmth during the Jurassic–Cretaceous: New evidence from clumped isotope thermometry

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 2
      Geology
      Geological Society of America

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In order to understand the climate dynamics of the Mesozoic greenhouse world, it is vital to determine paleotemperatures from higher latitudes. For the Jurassic and Cretaceous climate, there are significant discrepancies between different proxies and between proxy data and climate models. We determined paleotemperatures from Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous belemnites using the carbonate clumped isotope paleothermometer and compared these values to temperatures derived from TEX86 and other proxies. From our analyses, we infer an average temperature of ∼25 °C for the upper part of the water column of the southern Atlantic Ocean. Our data imply that for mid- to high latitudes, climate models underestimate marine temperatures by >5 °C and, therefore, the amount of warming that would accompany an increase in atmospheric CO2 of more than 4× pre-industrial levels, as is projected for the near future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification.

          The rise in Arctic near-surface air temperatures has been almost twice as large as the global average in recent decades-a feature known as 'Arctic amplification'. Increased concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have driven Arctic and global average warming; however, the underlying causes of Arctic amplification remain uncertain. The roles of reductions in snow and sea ice cover and changes in atmospheric and oceanic circulation, cloud cover and water vapour are still matters of debate. A better understanding of the processes responsible for the recent amplified warming is essential for assessing the likelihood, and impacts, of future rapid Arctic warming and sea ice loss. Here we show that the Arctic warming is strongest at the surface during most of the year and is primarily consistent with reductions in sea ice cover. Changes in cloud cover, in contrast, have not contributed strongly to recent warming. Increases in atmospheric water vapour content, partly in response to reduced sea ice cover, may have enhanced warming in the lower part of the atmosphere during summer and early autumn. We conclude that diminishing sea ice has had a leading role in recent Arctic temperature amplification. The findings reinforce suggestions that strong positive ice-temperature feedbacks have emerged in the Arctic, increasing the chances of further rapid warming and sea ice loss, and will probably affect polar ecosystems, ice-sheet mass balance and human activities in the Arctic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The organic geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              New indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature reconstructions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Geology
                Geological Society of America
                0091-7613
                May 31 2019
                August 01 2019
                May 31 2019
                August 01 2019
                : 47
                : 8
                : 724-728
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
                [2 ]Institute of Geosciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [3 ]School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, PL4 8AA Plymouth, UK
                Article
                10.1130/G46263.1
                a2c43775-44ad-4662-9ca1-a1f4587690de
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article