53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
7 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Complicated Grief During COVID-19 : An International Perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Cultures across the globe have evolved time-tested rituals to honor those who die and offer solace and support to survivors with the goal of helping them to accept the reality of the death, cope with the feelings of loss, adjust to life without the deceased, and find ways to maintain a connection to the memory of the deceased. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted these rituals and brought significant changes to the way we mourn. Specifically, public health responses to COVID-19 such as social distancing or isolation, delays or cancellations of traditional religious and cultural rituals, and shifts from in-person to online ceremonies have disrupted rituals and thus made it more difficult to access support and complete the psychological tasks typically associated with bereavement. This paper conceptualizes the common bereavement tasks including emotion-focused coping, maintaining a connection to the deceased, disengagement and reframing death and loss, and problem-focused coping. It provides examples of how the COVID-19 pandemic has altered mourning rituals across several cultures and religions and contributed to prolonged grief disorder as defined by the ICD-11 that includes depressive symptoms and post-traumatic stress. Early evidence suggested that the suddenness of loss, the social isolation, and the lack of social support often associated with COVID-19-related death are salient risk factors for complicated grief. As a consequence, psychological assessments, grief counseling, and mental health support are needed by families of patients who died from COVID-19. These services must be essential components of any comprehensive public health response to the pandemic.

          Impact and Implications.

          During the COVID-19 pandemic, many families lost their loved ones suddenly and unexpectedly and due to safety measures were isolated from social interactions and all rituals for grieving which exist in every culture. These circumstances can put certain family members at risk of developing complicated grief, which is longer and more impactful on their life than the normal course of grief. Good health is the third SDG 3 put together by the United Nations for the next 10 years. Mental health is an essential part of well-being and good health. It is thus imperative to include mental health support and grief counseling for any family which lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Poverty, Inequality & COVID-19: The Forgotten Vulnerable

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality on health, social, and economic indicators: a comprehensive review of data from March, 2020, to September, 2021

            Background Gender is emerging as a significant factor in the social, economic, and health effects of COVID-19. However, most existing studies have focused on its direct impact on health. Here, we aimed to explore the indirect effects of COVID-19 on gender disparities globally. Methods We reviewed publicly available datasets with information on indicators related to vaccine hesitancy and uptake, health care services, economic and work-related concerns, education, and safety at home and in the community. We used mixed effects regression, Gaussian process regression, and bootstrapping to synthesise all data sources. We accounted for uncertainty in the underlying data and modelling process. We then used mixed effects logistic regression to explore gender gaps globally and by region. Findings Between March, 2020, and September, 2021, women were more likely to report employment loss (26·0% [95% uncertainty interval 23·8–28·8, by September, 2021) than men (20·4% [18·2–22·9], by September, 2021), as well as forgoing work to care for others (ratio of women to men: 1·8 by March, 2020, and 2·4 by September, 2021). Women and girls were 1·21 times (1·20–1·21) more likely than men and boys to report dropping out of school for reasons other than school closures. Women were also 1·23 (1·22–1·23) times more likely than men to report that gender-based violence had increased during the pandemic. By September 2021, women and men did not differ significantly in vaccine hesitancy or uptake. Interpretation The most significant gender gaps identified in our study show intensified levels of pre-existing widespread inequalities between women and men during the COVID-19 pandemic. Political and social leaders should prioritise policies that enable and encourage women to participate in the labour force and continue their education, thereby equipping and enabling them with greater ability to overcome the barriers they face. Funding The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              On death and dying

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                ipp
                International Perspectives in Psychology
                Research, Practice, Consultation
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2157-3883
                2157-3891
                July 20, 2022
                July 2022
                : 11
                : 3 , Special Issue: Psychology and the COVID-19 Pandemic – A Global Perspective
                : 214-221
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
                [ 2 ]Department of African American Studies and Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
                [ 3 ]Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
                [ 4 ]Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
                [ 5 ]Department of Psychology, Christ University, Bangalore, India
                [ 6 ]Department of Psychology, Sociology & Social Work, School of Social Sciences, University of the Bahamas, Nassau, Bahamas
                Author notes
                Brigitte Khoury, Department of Psychiatry, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box 11-0236/B2, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon, bk03@ 123456aub.edu.lb
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-2875
                Article
                ipp_11_3_214
                10.1027/2157-3891/a000055
                36311343
                9e96ff2a-f79a-4cee-afaf-08e0052390c4
                Copyright @ 2022
                History
                : August 23, 2021
                : May 30, 2022
                : May 30, 2022
                Funding
                Funding: Dr. Klicperova-Baker was supported by the NPO “ Systemic Risk Institute” LX22NPO5101 grant.
                Categories
                Article

                Sociology,Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Political science,Psychology,General behavioral science,Public health
                bereavement tasks,complicated grief,COVID-19,culture,tradition,mourning

                Comments

                Comment on this article