There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Most models of optimal progeny size assume that there is a trade-off between progeny size and number, and that progeny fitness increases with increasing investment per young. We find that both assumptions are supported by empirical studies but that the trade-off is less apparent when organisms are iteroparous, use adult-acquired resources for reproduction, or provide parental care. We then review patterns of variation in progeny size among species, among populations within species, among individuals within populations, and among progeny produced by a single female. We argue that much of the variation in progeny size among species, and among populations within species, is likely due to variation in natural selection. However, few studies have manipulated progeny environments and demonstrated that the relationship between progeny size and fitness actually differs among environments, and fewer still have demonstrated why selection favors different sized progeny in different environments. We argue that much of the variation in progeny size among females within populations, and among progeny produced by a single female, is probably nonadaptive. However, some species of arthropods exhibit plasticity in progeny size in response to several environmental factors, and much of this plasticity is likely adaptive. We conclude that advances in theory have substantially outpaced empirical data. We hope that this review will stimulate researchers to examine the specific factors that result in variation in selection on progeny size within and among populations, and how this variation in selection influences the evolution of the patterns we observe.
Oogenesis in insects is typically a nutrient-limited process, triggered only if sufficient nourishment is available. This nourishment can be acquired during the larval or adult stage, depending on the insect. Timing of food intake will have major effects on mechanisms of hormonal control. When nourishment for eggs is taken primarily by adults, insufficient nutrition inhibits egg development through mechanisms such as inhibition of corpora allata, as seen in Orthoptera and Blattaria. In adult Diptera, lack of protein inhibits release of brain factors that produce reproductive competency or ovarian stimulation. Lepidoptera have been characterized as lacking substantial regulation of oogenesis because egg development is underway at emergence. Many species for which ecological data are available do not mobilize reserves carried over from the larval stage until they feed as adults. The endocrine mechanisms underlying these systems are poorly understood. In many insects, mating and activity can affect nutritional state and therefore oogenesis. Mating can stimulate oogenesis through mobilization of reserves or through nutritional contributions by males to females. Activity, especially flight, and oogenesis can compete for energy. The flight apparatus, especially the muscle, can also compete with oogenesis for protein. Social insects exhibit extreme specializations in oogenesis; females range in fertility from completely sterile to hyperfecund. Food flow within colonies is a major factor regulating fecundity. Finally, maternal nourishment is not needed for oogenesis in parasitoids and pseudoplacental viviparous insects, which produce eggs with little or no yolk. Virtually nothing is known about the endocrine regulation of oogenesis on these insects.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.