9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Thrown off track? Adjustments of Asian business to shock events

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The need for a better understanding of radical uncertainty might have never been greater. Ill-preparedness for natural hazards, a resurgence of serious public health concerns or illusions of control over unruly technology question the extent to which we can ‘really’ shape the world around us. Human-made crises, too, test how we routinely do things. We ask how organisations and actors within them prepare for a collapse of meaning and practise radical uncertainty. Given the breadth and depth of the region’s energy (and, as some would argue, turbulences), Asia provides a fitting context for exploring accommodation to and learning from low-probability, high-impact incidents. By reviewing the business and management research on shocks in Asia, we find that there is a strong human side to dealing with the unknown. We argue that what organisations and actors within them do prior, during and after a shock event is substantially contingent upon cultural environments. To elaborate, we discuss the role of the uncertainty avoidance dimension of national culture in dealing with shock events. We further combine this dimension with the universalism-particularism dimension to discuss future research directions. Our exploration of resultant differences in preparedness, resourcefulness and learning offers a more rounded inquiry into how Asian business actors deal with shocks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

          This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sierk.horn@hm.edu
                tomoki@econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp
                matthias.m.weiss@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
                Journal
                Asian Bus Manage
                Asian Business & Management
                Palgrave Macmillan UK (London )
                1472-4782
                1476-9328
                11 June 2021
                11 June 2021
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.434949.7, ISNI 0000 0001 1408 3925, Hochschule München, Munich University of Applied Sciences, ; Am Stadtpark 20, 81243 Munich, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.258799.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0372 2033, Graduate School of Management, , Kyoto University, ; Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.5570.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0490 981X, Center for Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation, , Ruhr-University Bochum, ; Suttner-Nobel-Allee 4, 44803 Bochum, Germany
                Article
                158
                10.1057/s41291-021-00158-y
                8194381
                98548971-5be7-47fc-a501-37a8eb34b622
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften München (3365)
                Categories
                Editorial

                shock,uncertainty,resilience,asian business,cultural differences

                Comments

                Comment on this article