7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

      1
      The Qualitative Report
      Nova Southeastern University

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of reliability and validity are common in quantitative research and now it is reconsidered in the qualitative research paradigm. Since reliability and validity are rooted in positivist perspective then they should be redefined for their use in a naturalistic approach. Like reliability and validity as used in quantitative research are providing springboard to examine what these two terms mean in the qualitative research paradigm, triangulation as used in quantitative research to test the reliability and validity can also illuminate some ways to test or maximize the validity and reliability of a qualitative study. Therefore, reliability, validity and triangulation, if they are relevant research concepts, particularly from a qualitative point of view, have to be redefined in order to reflect the multiple ways of establishing truth.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Qualitative Report
          TQR
          Nova Southeastern University
          2160-3715
          1052-0147
          January 23 2015
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Toronto
          Article
          10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
          91869a8c-1f14-49ab-9bad-b779a609fbea
          © 2015
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article