53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the reliability and validity of the Danish version of Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Organizational change initiatives in health care frequently achieve only partial implementation success. Understanding an organizational readiness for change (ORC) may be a way to develop more effective and efficient change strategies. Denmark, like many countries, has begun a major system-wide structural reform which involves considerable changes in service delivery. Due to the lack of a validated Danish instrument, we aimed to translate and validate a Danish version of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) questionnaire. It measures if organizational members are confident in their collective commitment towards and ability ( efficacy) to implement organizational change. ORIC is concise, grounded in theory, and designed, but not yet validated among employees in a real hospital setting.

          Methods

          The 12-item ORIC instrument was translated into Danish and back-translated to English. Employees ( N = 284) at a hospital department facing a major organizational change in the Central Denmark Region completed the questionnaire. Face and content validity was ascertained. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. Item response theory (Rasch analysis) was used to determine item and person reliability.

          Results

          Response rate was 72%. A two factor (commitment and efficacy), 11-item scale, of the Danish language ORIC was shown to be valid (CFI = .95, RMSEA = .067, and CMNI/DF = 2.32) and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha 0.88) in a health care setting. Item response analysis confirmed acceptable person and item separation reliability.

          Conclusions

          Our version of ORIC showed acceptable validity and reliability as an instrument for measuring readiness for implementing organizational change in a Danish-speaking health care population. For health care managers interested in evaluating their organizations and tailor change strategies, ORIC’s brevity and theoretical underpinnings could make it an appealing and feasible tool to develop more successful change efforts.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0769-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Conceptualization and measurement of organizational readiness for change: a review of the literature in health services research and other fields.

            Health care practitioners and change experts contend that organizational readiness for change is a critical precursor to successful change implementation. This article assesses how organizational readiness for change has been defined and measured in health services research and other fields. Analysis of 106 peer-reviewed articles reveals conceptual ambiguities and disagreements in current thinking and writing about organizational readiness for change. Inspection of 43 instruments for measuring organizational readiness for change reveals limited evidence of reliability or validity for most publicly available measures. Several conceptual and methodological issues that need to be addressed to generate knowledge useful for practice are identified and discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs.

              The field of worksite health promotion has moved toward the development and testing of comprehensive programs that target health behaviors with interventions operating at multiple levels of influence. Yet, observational and process evaluation studies indicate that such programs are challenging for worksites to implement effectively. Research has identified several organizational factors that promote or inhibit effective implementation of comprehensive worksite health promotion programs. However, no integrated theory of implementation has emerged from this research. This article describes a theory of the organizational determinants of effective implementation of comprehensive worksite health promotion programs. The model is adapted from theory and research on the implementation of complex innovations in manufacturing, education and health care settings. The article uses the Working Well Trial to illustrate the model's theoretical constructs. Although the article focuses on comprehensive worksite health promotion programs, the conceptual model may also apply to other types of complex health promotion programs. An organization-level theory of the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Marie.storkholm@ki.se
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                5 June 2018
                5 June 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 78
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0512 597X, GRID grid.154185.c, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, , Aarhus University Hospital, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-2946
                Article
                769
                10.1186/s13012-018-0769-y
                5989337
                29871691
                2b4f63c5-97da-4d5c-8c91-bdc451bf3172
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 February 2018
                : 22 May 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: MS was financially supported by Aarhus University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine at Aarhus University, and Central Region Denmark.
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008628, Institut for Klinisk Medicin, Aarhus Universitet;
                Funded by: Central Denmark Region
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007606, Aarhus Universitetshospital;
                Categories
                Short Report
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                organizational readiness for change,validation study,translation,change management,implementation,questionnaire

                Comments

                Comment on this article