20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Triple jeopardy: disabled people and the COVID-19 pandemic

      discussion
      a , b , c
      Lancet (London, England)
      Elsevier Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People with disabilities have been differentially affected by COVID-19 because of three factors: the increased risk of poor outcomes from the disease itself, reduced access to routine health care and rehabilitation, and the adverse social impacts of efforts to mitigate the pandemic. 10 years ago, WHO's World Report on Disability noted that people with disabilities were more likely to be older, poorer, experience comorbidities, and be female. 1 Older age, deprivation, and comorbidities are also associated with increased risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19. 2 Risk of death from COVID-19 between Jan 24 and Nov 30, 2020, in England was 3·1 times greater for men with disabilities and 3·5 times greater for women with disabilities than for men and women without disabilities. 3 People with intellectual disabilities living in congregate residential settings, relevant mainly to high-income settings, had a higher risk of death from COVID-19 than people without disabilities.4, 5 But even in household settings, 6 people with intellectual disability have an increased risk of COVID-19 death. 7 Worldwide, disasters and emergencies often disproportionately impact the disability community, and this pandemic is no exception.8, 9, 10 People with disabilities have faced many barriers to inclusion in the COVID-19 response (panel ). The lockdown measures societies have taken during the COVID-19 pandemic have meant people with disabilities are worse off and more excluded. 11 If lockdown and curfew are enforced through aggressive actions by security forces, as in some countries in southern Africa, then people with disabilities who may need to access health care or pharmacies are penalised. Cancellation or postponement of regular health care or rehabilitation will differentially impact those with additional health needs.10, 12 When assistive technology is not prescribed, maintained, or repaired, people with disabilities are rendered dependent. When social care is put on hold, cancelled, or reduced, people with disabilities are thrown back on the support of families if they have them. When it is not possible to attend day centres or voluntary projects, people with disabilities may be left with no one to meet. 13 When individuals are expected to use face masks and physically distance, people with hearing loss who cannot lip read or people with visual impairment who use guide dogs can find it difficult to follow these rules and as a result they might be stigmatised. Additionally, confinement in homes increases the risk of physical or sexual violence and abuse, to which children and adults with disabilities are additionally vulnerable.14, 15 Panel Barriers to inclusion of people with disabilities in the COVID-19 response • Failure to ensure safety of people with disabilities in congregate living or health facilities • Failure to ensure access for people with disabilities to: food deliveries; internet; COVID-19 testing; and water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities • Failure to give relevant people with disabilities or their families or support workers evidence-based priority for COVID-19 vaccination or COVID-19 treatment where required • Lack of or inadequate support for people with disabilities living alone or where family members or support workers are self-isolating or affected by COVID-19 • Unclear public health messaging or lack of accessible messaging • Postponement of required medical treatment, including rehabilitation • Failure to collect data on disability to allow disaggregation Inadequate preparedness for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with disabilities has been shockingly familiar. People with disabilities have been overlooked or are an afterthought in the education provision for children with special educational needs,9, 12, 16 the provision of personal protective equipment in social care,4, 5, 6 or the inclusion of sign language in government announcements. In Uganda, school closures have led to the exclusion of many young people with disabilities since educational materials are not in accessible formats and access to assistive technology, including the internet, has been a challenge. In a public health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, clear information becomes more important than ever. In the UK, messages have been confused or complicated, which has been difficult for people with intellectual disabilities to understand. In other countries, there can be low confidence in public health messaging. 17 Increased isolation and uncertainty or fear about the pandemic have also impacted the mental health of people with disabilities. People with mental illness can find isolation and fear particularly debilitating.18, 19 People with physical impairments are also disproportionately at risk of mental health conditions. 20 For many people, this pandemic has generally been bad for mental health.18, 19 Yet in the pandemic there have been some positive developments for people with disabilities. Where they can get internet access, people with disabilities have been able to participate in society as never before, because physical and communication barriers have largely disappeared as education, work, shopping, and many leisure activities have been driven online. 21 Moreover, there are reassuring signs in some places that people are looking out for each other more, often replacing the dominant individualism of high-income settings with neighbourliness and mutual aid. People with disabilities do much better in societies with strong social protections and where people support each other. 22 However, participation—whether digital or in person—typically requires financial and other resources. The economic shocks of this pandemic particularly impact the poorest in society, who are often old, disabled, or female. About 80% of the poorest people with disabilities live in low-income and middle-income countries, where there is either inadequate social safety protections or no welfare state. 1 The consequence is that people with disabilities often have to rely on families or charity. People with disabilities do not want a return to the pre-pandemic status quo, which was a world filled with complex barriers to inclusion, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased risks, compounded unmet health needs, and disproportionately affected the socioeconomic lives of people with disabilities around the world. As evidence evolves, strategic thinking is needed about how society, social inclusion, and public health can better reach the 15% of the global population 1 who are disabled. The inclusion of people with disabilities in the COVID-19 response should be remembered throughout all post-recovery stages by assessing their needs and ensuring that they are consulted and can participate in policy development, programme design, and implementation. A better future has to grow from learning the lessons, listening to the life experiences of people with disabilities, and making meaningful investments that improve the wellbeing and socioeconomic conditions of people with disabilities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: a longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts

          Background The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in people with pre-existing mental health disorders is unclear. In three psychiatry case-control cohorts, we compared the perceived mental health impact and coping and changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety, worry, and loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic between people with and without lifetime depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders. Methods Between April 1 and May 13, 2020, online questionnaires were distributed among the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, Netherlands Study of Depression in Older Persons, and Netherlands Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Association cohorts, including people with (n=1181) and without (n=336) depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders. The questionnaire contained questions on perceived mental health impact, fear of COVID-19, coping, and four validated scales assessing depressive symptoms, anxiety, worry, and loneliness used in previous waves during 2006–16. Number and chronicity of disorders were based on diagnoses in previous waves. Linear regression and mixed models were done. Findings The number and chronicity of disorders showed a positive graded dose–response relation, with greater perceived impact on mental health, fear, and poorer coping. Although people with depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders scored higher on all four symptom scales than did individuals without these mental health disorders, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, they did not report a greater increase in symptoms during the pandemic. In fact, people without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders showed a greater increase in symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas individuals with the greatest burden on their mental health tended to show a slight symptom decrease. Interpretation People with depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders are experiencing a detrimental impact on their mental health from the COVID-19 pandemic, which requires close monitoring in clinical practice. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic does not seem to have further increased symptom severity compared with their prepandemic levels. Funding Dutch Research Council.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Demographic risk factors for COVID-19 infection, severity, ICU admission and death: a meta-analysis of 59 studies

            Objective We aimed to describe the associations of age and sex with the risk of COVID-19 in different severity stages ranging from infection to death. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed and Embase through 4 May 2020. Study selection We considered cohort and case–control studies that evaluated differences in age and sex on the risk of COVID-19 infection, disease severity, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. Data extraction and synthesis We screened and included studies using standardised electronic data extraction forms and we pooled data from published studies and data acquired by contacting authors using random effects meta-analysis. We assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results We screened 11.550 titles and included 59 studies comprising 36.470 patients in the analyses. The methodological quality of the included papers was high (8.2 out of 9). Men had a higher risk for infection with COVID-19 than women (relative risk (RR) 1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.12). When infected, they also had a higher risk for severe COVID-19 disease (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.27), a higher need for intensive care (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.74) and a higher risk of death (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.91). The analyses also showed that patients aged 70 years and above have a higher infection risk (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.81), a higher risk for severe COVID-19 disease (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.32), a higher need for intensive care (RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.60) and a higher risk of death once infected (RR 3.61, 95% CI 2.70 to 4.84) compared with patients younger than 70 years. Conclusions Meta-analyses on 59 studies comprising 36.470 patients showed that men and patients aged 70 and above have a higher risk for COVID-19 infection, severe disease, ICU admission and death. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020180085.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

              About 15% of adults worldwide have a disability. These individuals are frequently reported to be at increased risk of violence, yet quantitative syntheses of studies of this issue are scarce. We aimed to quantify violence against adults with disabilities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                16 March 2021
                16 March 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
                [b ]Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University, Makerere, Uganda
                [c ]School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
                Article
                S0140-6736(21)00625-5
                10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00625-5
                7963443
                33740474
                8d4087bb-28d0-4ab7-8b5c-a89755880093
                © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Comment

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article