There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
‘All of humanity’s problems stem from the man’s inability to sit quietly in a room
alone’.
We need to revisit this statement by Blaise Pascal time and again to unearth something
invaluable, to reinforce something primal, especially in times such as these where
the whole world is in a state of lockdown, courtesy the corona virus disease 2019
(COVID-19). This disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has literally brought the world down
to its knees just within last few months.
COVID-19
The world is facing a global public health crisis for the last three months, as the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerges as a menacing pandemic. Besides the rising
number of cases and fatalities with this pandemic, there has also been significant
socio-economic, political and psycho-social impact. Billions of people are quarantined
in their own homes as nations have locked down to implement social distancing as a
measure to contain the spread of infection. Those affected and suspicious cases are
isolated. This social isolation leads to chronic loneliness and boredom, which if
long enough can have detrimental effects on physical and mental well-being. The timelines
of the growing pandemic being uncertain, the isolation is compounded by mass panic
and anxiety. Crisis often affects the human mind in crucial ways, enhancing threat
arousal and snowballing the anxiety. Rational and logical decisions are replaced by
biased and faulty decisions based on mere ‘faith and belief’. This important social
threat of a pandemic is largely neglected. We look at the impact of COVID-19 on loneliness
across different social strata, its implications in the modern digitalized age and
outline a way forward with possible solutions to the same.
There is no doubt that national and global economies are suffering, the health systems
are under severe pressure, mass hysteria has acquired a frantic pace and people’s
hope and aspirations are taking a merciless beating. The uncertainty of a new and
relatively unknown infection increases the anxiety, which gets compounded by isolation
in lockdown. As global public health agencies like World Health Organization (WHO)
and Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) struggle to contain the outbreak,
social distancing is repeatedly suggested as one of the most useful preventive strategies.
It has been used successfully in the past to slow or prevent community transmission
during pandemics (WHO, 2019). While certain countries like China have just started
recovering from their three-month lockdown, countries like Iran, Italy and South Korea
have been badly hit irrespective of these measures and those like India have initiated
nation-wide shutdown and curfews to prevent the community transmission of COVID-19.
Ironically however, the social distancing is a misnomer, which implies physical separation
to prevent the viral spread.
The modern world has rarely been so isolated and restricted. Multiple restrictions
have been imposed on public movement to contain the spread of the virus. People are
forced to stay at home and are burdened with the heft of quarantine. Individuals are
waking up every day wrapped in a freezing cauldron of social isolation, sheer boredom
and a penetrating feeling of loneliness. The modern man has known little like this,
in an age of rapid travel and communication. Though during the earlier outbreaks of
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS),
Spanish flu, Ebola and Plague the world was equally shaken with millions of casualties,
the dominance of technology was not as much as to make the distancing felt amplified
(Smith, 2006). In this era of digitalization, social media, social hangouts, eateries,
pubs, bars, malls, movie theatres to keep us distracted creating apparent ‘social
ties’. Humankind has always known what to do next, with their lives generally following
a regular trail. But this sudden cataclysmic turn of events have brought them face
to face with a dire reckoning – how to live with oneself. It is indeed a frightening
realization when a whole generation or two knows how to deal with a nuclear fallout
but are at their wit’s end on how to spend time with oneself. Ironically, however,
it has stranded them with their families (those who are unaffected by the illness)
and are expected to strengthen the bonds of relationship. But, as mentioned before,
the ‘virtual connectedness’ provided by social media has probably made us forget what
proximity in relationships feel like. This can be a double-edged sword, that can either
mend or strain relations, based on the pre-existing intimacy and communication patterns.
It feels like a monumental task to stay stuck with yourself and your loved ones, while
the pandemic looms large over the world.
Loneliness during a pandemic: the impact and social variations
Loneliness is often described as the state of being without any company or in isolation
from the community or society. It is considered to be a dark and miserable feeling,
a risk factor for many mental disorders like depression, anxiety, adjustment disorder,
chronic stress, insomnia or even late-life dementia (Wilson et al., 2007). Loneliness
is common in the old-age group, leading to increased depression rates and suicide.
It has been well-documented that long periods of isolation in custodial care or quarantine
for illness has detrimental effects on mental well-being (Stickley & Koyanagi, 2016).
Loneliness is proposed to break this essential construct and disrupt social integration,
leading to increase in isolation. This is a vicious cycle which makes the lonely individual
more segregated into his own ‘constricted’ space. Loneliness is also one of the prime
indicators of social well-being (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008). Most people cringe at
the idea of this social isolation. They will do anything to keep themselves preoccupied
or distracted, from acts of outrageous indulgences to preposterous shows of vanity
and depravation. Besides, loneliness has also shown to be an independent risk factor
for sensory loss, connective tissue and auto-immune disorders, cardio-vascular disorders
and obesity. If this self-isolation and lockdown is prolonged, it is likely that chronic
loneliness will decrease physical activity leading to increased risk of frailty and
fractures (Mushtaq et al., 2014).
This COVID-19 pandemic seems to have brought our frenzied speed of modern society
to a grinding halt and has literally crushed the wings of unlimited social interaction.
Under these social restrictions, individuals are forced to reconcile with this terrifying
reality of isolation which can contribute to domestic inter-personal violence and
boredom. Similar trends of increase in isolation and loneliness have been noticed
among emergency workers and quarantined population in Wuhan, China. This has increased
the prevalence of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorders and insomnia
in the population. It also contributes to fatigue and decreases performance in health-care
workers (Torales et al., 2020). But neither life nor the society had probably readied
us for this task. The concept of boredom and loneliness leads to anger, frustration
on the authorities and can lead for many to defy the quarantine restrictions, which
can cause dire public health consequences. Emotional unpreparedness for such biological
disasters have detrimental effects, as this situation is unprecedented in all measures.
It also makes us take a step back and question: is social distancing only for a specific
social class; as millions of migrant labourers, homeless individuals and daily wage
workers stay stranded in their workplaces, railway and bus stations and factories
with overcrowding and poor hygiene. When basic amenities of life are scarce, it is
far-fetched myth to think about distancing or hand sanitization according to the prescribed
standards (The Print, 2020; www.theprint.in). Isolation or loneliness for them is
thus different. It is being away from their origins, their families and being deprived
of basic human rights and self-dignity. Segregation from self-identity can also form
the basis for loneliness, just that it reflects differently in different socio-economic
strata (Valkenburg & Peter, 2008). It is again ironic, how the construct of loneliness
varies based on the social strata giving rise to dimensional psycho-social needs.
The way forward
First step in this journey is to transform this devious loneliness to solitude. Loneliness,
which on one hand is an emotion filled with terror and desolation, solitude, its cousin
is full of peace and tranquillity. The primal answer to loneliness has always been
in our roots: the ability to be at peace with oneself. This however has been a habit
long lost by the humanity in the trends of globalization.
Many great works of art, philosophy, literature have emerged from solitude. This comes
with enjoying one’s existence and ability to cherish the bonds with others. This might
be a good time to engage in long-forgotten hobbies, neglected passions and unfulfilled
dreams. Improving proximal bonds with family and loved ones is another opportunity.
Distancing from social media will be beneficial, as during times of pandemic it can
contribute to ‘infodemic’ causing information overload. COVID-19 by all means is a
‘digital epidemic’ where the related statistics spread faster than the virus itself.
Only relevant and updated information about the situation outside helps relieve anxiety
during isolation (Hyvärinen & Vos, 2016). It is vital that the virus does not invade
us ‘psychologically’ which can last much beyond the resolution of this pandemic.
As mental health professionals, we need to be sensitive to the personalized needs
of those in quarantine and cater to them. Their personal and psychological needs are
to be adhered to. Digital communication needs to be maintained with their loved ones.
As mentioned, before social connectedness matters. Similar protocols in China during
the first stage of outbreak had shown to improve quality of lives of those isolated
(Duan & Zhu, 2020). Need for community-based and brief psycho-social interventions
have also been stressed upon by Torales et al. (2020) in their recent article, acknowledging
the chronic mental health impact of the ongoing pandemic situation. Furthermore, research
has shown that as simple as weekly telephonic sessions can help reduce anxiety at
the time of pandemics. These sessions need to be brief and solution-focused (Yang
et al., 2020). Social integration forms another important aspect, in which involvement
of the associated people in life matters. Taking care of the domestic helpers, the
vendors, the security personnel, etc. or even a simple exchange of greetings with
neighbors or strangers can give a feeling that ‘we are all in this together’. The
bonds of humanity turn even more important at such times, when the whole world shares
the same threads of anxiety. Similar sensitization needs to be done for the allied
specialities to understand and appreciate the mental health needs of a biological
disaster. The pandemic will eventually be over giving rise to two important lessons:
the emotional preparedness for solitude at times of such crisis and psycho-social
well-being forming the cornerstone of public health.
The current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus infection among humans in Wuhan (China) and its spreading around the globe is heavily impacting on the global health and mental health. Despite all resources employed to counteract the spreading of the virus, additional global strategies are needed to handle the related mental health issues. Published articles concerning mental health related to the COVID-19 outbreak and other previous global infections have been considered and reviewed. This outbreak is leading to additional health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger and fear globally. Collective concerns influence daily behaviors, economy, prevention strategies and decision-making from policy makers, health organizations and medical centers, which can weaken strategies of COVID-19 control and lead to more morbidity and mental health needs at global level.
Over the past several weeks, the total number of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the number of associated deaths has been increasing. Of the deaths caused by COVID-19, most were older adults. 1 China has the largest ageing population globally. In 2017, there were 241 million older adults (>60 years) nationwide, accounting for 17·3% of the total population, 2 of whom around half were empty-nest elderly (ie, without children, or whose children left home and worked elsewhere) with little social support. More than 30 million people were older than 80 years, and more than 40 million required long-term care due to disabilities.2, 3 Mental health problems are common in older Chinese adults (ie, ≥55 years), with the prevalence of depressive symptoms reported to be 23·6% in this population. 4 The rapid transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and high death rate could exacerbate the risk of mental health problems and worsen existing psychiatric symptoms, further impairing their daily functioning and cognition. Public transport in many regions has been suspended to lower the risk of disease transmission; thus, online mental health services have been widely adopted. 5 Older adults have limited access to internet services and smart phones, and as such only a small fraction of older adults can benefit from such service provision. In addition, in most areas of China, clinically stable older adults with psychiatric disorders or their guardians usually need to visit psychiatric outpatient clinics monthly to obtain the maintenance medications. The current mass quarantines and restrictions to public transport have inevitably become a major barrier to access maintenance treatments for this group. The outbreak of COVID-19 has raised great challenges for mental health services for older adults in the community. There seems to be insufficient and inadequate attention paid to this vulnerable population in the recently established crisis psychological services in China. Stakeholders and health policy makers should collaborate to resolve this barrier in order to provide high-quality, timely crisis psychological services to community-dwelling older adults.
Title:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Publisher:
SAGE Publications
(Sage UK: London, England
)
ISSN
(Print):
0020-7640
ISSN
(Electronic):
1741-2854
Publication date
(Electronic):
29
April
2020
Publication date
(Print):
September
2020
Volume: 66
Issue: 6
Pages: 525-527
Affiliations
[1
]Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS),
Bengaluru, India
[2
]Department of Psychiatry, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, India
Author notes
[*]Debanjan Banerjee, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and
Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Hosur Road, Bangalore 560029, India. Email:
dr.Djan88@
123456gmail.com
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.