79
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness

      editorial
      1 , 2
      The International Journal of Social Psychiatry
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ‘All of humanity’s problems stem from the man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone’. We need to revisit this statement by Blaise Pascal time and again to unearth something invaluable, to reinforce something primal, especially in times such as these where the whole world is in a state of lockdown, courtesy the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has literally brought the world down to its knees just within last few months. COVID-19 The world is facing a global public health crisis for the last three months, as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerges as a menacing pandemic. Besides the rising number of cases and fatalities with this pandemic, there has also been significant socio-economic, political and psycho-social impact. Billions of people are quarantined in their own homes as nations have locked down to implement social distancing as a measure to contain the spread of infection. Those affected and suspicious cases are isolated. This social isolation leads to chronic loneliness and boredom, which if long enough can have detrimental effects on physical and mental well-being. The timelines of the growing pandemic being uncertain, the isolation is compounded by mass panic and anxiety. Crisis often affects the human mind in crucial ways, enhancing threat arousal and snowballing the anxiety. Rational and logical decisions are replaced by biased and faulty decisions based on mere ‘faith and belief’. This important social threat of a pandemic is largely neglected. We look at the impact of COVID-19 on loneliness across different social strata, its implications in the modern digitalized age and outline a way forward with possible solutions to the same. There is no doubt that national and global economies are suffering, the health systems are under severe pressure, mass hysteria has acquired a frantic pace and people’s hope and aspirations are taking a merciless beating. The uncertainty of a new and relatively unknown infection increases the anxiety, which gets compounded by isolation in lockdown. As global public health agencies like World Health Organization (WHO) and Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) struggle to contain the outbreak, social distancing is repeatedly suggested as one of the most useful preventive strategies. It has been used successfully in the past to slow or prevent community transmission during pandemics (WHO, 2019). While certain countries like China have just started recovering from their three-month lockdown, countries like Iran, Italy and South Korea have been badly hit irrespective of these measures and those like India have initiated nation-wide shutdown and curfews to prevent the community transmission of COVID-19. Ironically however, the social distancing is a misnomer, which implies physical separation to prevent the viral spread. The modern world has rarely been so isolated and restricted. Multiple restrictions have been imposed on public movement to contain the spread of the virus. People are forced to stay at home and are burdened with the heft of quarantine. Individuals are waking up every day wrapped in a freezing cauldron of social isolation, sheer boredom and a penetrating feeling of loneliness. The modern man has known little like this, in an age of rapid travel and communication. Though during the earlier outbreaks of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Spanish flu, Ebola and Plague the world was equally shaken with millions of casualties, the dominance of technology was not as much as to make the distancing felt amplified (Smith, 2006). In this era of digitalization, social media, social hangouts, eateries, pubs, bars, malls, movie theatres to keep us distracted creating apparent ‘social ties’. Humankind has always known what to do next, with their lives generally following a regular trail. But this sudden cataclysmic turn of events have brought them face to face with a dire reckoning – how to live with oneself. It is indeed a frightening realization when a whole generation or two knows how to deal with a nuclear fallout but are at their wit’s end on how to spend time with oneself. Ironically, however, it has stranded them with their families (those who are unaffected by the illness) and are expected to strengthen the bonds of relationship. But, as mentioned before, the ‘virtual connectedness’ provided by social media has probably made us forget what proximity in relationships feel like. This can be a double-edged sword, that can either mend or strain relations, based on the pre-existing intimacy and communication patterns. It feels like a monumental task to stay stuck with yourself and your loved ones, while the pandemic looms large over the world. Loneliness during a pandemic: the impact and social variations Loneliness is often described as the state of being without any company or in isolation from the community or society. It is considered to be a dark and miserable feeling, a risk factor for many mental disorders like depression, anxiety, adjustment disorder, chronic stress, insomnia or even late-life dementia (Wilson et al., 2007). Loneliness is common in the old-age group, leading to increased depression rates and suicide. It has been well-documented that long periods of isolation in custodial care or quarantine for illness has detrimental effects on mental well-being (Stickley & Koyanagi, 2016). Loneliness is proposed to break this essential construct and disrupt social integration, leading to increase in isolation. This is a vicious cycle which makes the lonely individual more segregated into his own ‘constricted’ space. Loneliness is also one of the prime indicators of social well-being (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008). Most people cringe at the idea of this social isolation. They will do anything to keep themselves preoccupied or distracted, from acts of outrageous indulgences to preposterous shows of vanity and depravation. Besides, loneliness has also shown to be an independent risk factor for sensory loss, connective tissue and auto-immune disorders, cardio-vascular disorders and obesity. If this self-isolation and lockdown is prolonged, it is likely that chronic loneliness will decrease physical activity leading to increased risk of frailty and fractures (Mushtaq et al., 2014). This COVID-19 pandemic seems to have brought our frenzied speed of modern society to a grinding halt and has literally crushed the wings of unlimited social interaction. Under these social restrictions, individuals are forced to reconcile with this terrifying reality of isolation which can contribute to domestic inter-personal violence and boredom. Similar trends of increase in isolation and loneliness have been noticed among emergency workers and quarantined population in Wuhan, China. This has increased the prevalence of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorders and insomnia in the population. It also contributes to fatigue and decreases performance in health-care workers (Torales et al., 2020). But neither life nor the society had probably readied us for this task. The concept of boredom and loneliness leads to anger, frustration on the authorities and can lead for many to defy the quarantine restrictions, which can cause dire public health consequences. Emotional unpreparedness for such biological disasters have detrimental effects, as this situation is unprecedented in all measures. It also makes us take a step back and question: is social distancing only for a specific social class; as millions of migrant labourers, homeless individuals and daily wage workers stay stranded in their workplaces, railway and bus stations and factories with overcrowding and poor hygiene. When basic amenities of life are scarce, it is far-fetched myth to think about distancing or hand sanitization according to the prescribed standards (The Print, 2020; www.theprint.in). Isolation or loneliness for them is thus different. It is being away from their origins, their families and being deprived of basic human rights and self-dignity. Segregation from self-identity can also form the basis for loneliness, just that it reflects differently in different socio-economic strata (Valkenburg & Peter, 2008). It is again ironic, how the construct of loneliness varies based on the social strata giving rise to dimensional psycho-social needs. The way forward First step in this journey is to transform this devious loneliness to solitude. Loneliness, which on one hand is an emotion filled with terror and desolation, solitude, its cousin is full of peace and tranquillity. The primal answer to loneliness has always been in our roots: the ability to be at peace with oneself. This however has been a habit long lost by the humanity in the trends of globalization. Many great works of art, philosophy, literature have emerged from solitude. This comes with enjoying one’s existence and ability to cherish the bonds with others. This might be a good time to engage in long-forgotten hobbies, neglected passions and unfulfilled dreams. Improving proximal bonds with family and loved ones is another opportunity. Distancing from social media will be beneficial, as during times of pandemic it can contribute to ‘infodemic’ causing information overload. COVID-19 by all means is a ‘digital epidemic’ where the related statistics spread faster than the virus itself. Only relevant and updated information about the situation outside helps relieve anxiety during isolation (Hyvärinen & Vos, 2016). It is vital that the virus does not invade us ‘psychologically’ which can last much beyond the resolution of this pandemic. As mental health professionals, we need to be sensitive to the personalized needs of those in quarantine and cater to them. Their personal and psychological needs are to be adhered to. Digital communication needs to be maintained with their loved ones. As mentioned, before social connectedness matters. Similar protocols in China during the first stage of outbreak had shown to improve quality of lives of those isolated (Duan & Zhu, 2020). Need for community-based and brief psycho-social interventions have also been stressed upon by Torales et al. (2020) in their recent article, acknowledging the chronic mental health impact of the ongoing pandemic situation. Furthermore, research has shown that as simple as weekly telephonic sessions can help reduce anxiety at the time of pandemics. These sessions need to be brief and solution-focused (Yang et al., 2020). Social integration forms another important aspect, in which involvement of the associated people in life matters. Taking care of the domestic helpers, the vendors, the security personnel, etc. or even a simple exchange of greetings with neighbors or strangers can give a feeling that ‘we are all in this together’. The bonds of humanity turn even more important at such times, when the whole world shares the same threads of anxiety. Similar sensitization needs to be done for the allied specialities to understand and appreciate the mental health needs of a biological disaster. The pandemic will eventually be over giving rise to two important lessons: the emotional preparedness for solitude at times of such crisis and psycho-social well-being forming the cornerstone of public health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health

          The current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus infection among humans in Wuhan (China) and its spreading around the globe is heavily impacting on the global health and mental health. Despite all resources employed to counteract the spreading of the virus, additional global strategies are needed to handle the related mental health issues. Published articles concerning mental health related to the COVID-19 outbreak and other previous global infections have been considered and reviewed. This outbreak is leading to additional health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger and fear globally. Collective concerns influence daily behaviors, economy, prevention strategies and decision-making from policy makers, health organizations and medical centers, which can weaken strategies of COVID-19 control and lead to more morbidity and mental health needs at global level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic

            The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has now spread across China for over a month. The National Health Commission has issued guidelines for emergency psychological crisis intervention for people affected by COVID-19. 1 Medical institutions and universities across China have opened online platforms to provide psychological counselling services for patients, their family members, and other people affected by the epidemic. However, Xiang and colleagues, 2 claim that the mental health needs of patients with confirmed COVID-19, patients with suspected infection, quarantined family members, and medical personnel have been poorly handled. The organisation and management models for psychological interventions in China must be improved. Several countries in the west (eg, the UK and USA) have established procedures for psychological crisis interventions to deal with public health emergencies. 3 Theoretical and practical research on psychological crisis interventions in China commenced relatively recently. In 2004, the Chinese Government issued guidelines on strengthening mental health initiatives, 4 and psychological crisis interventions have dealt with public health emergencies—eg, after the type A influenza outbreak and the Wenchuan earthquake—with good results.5, 6 During the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic, several psychological counselling telephone helplines were opened for the public, and quickly became important mechanisms in addressing psychological issues. However, the organisation and management of psychological intervention activities have several problems. First, little attention is paid to the practical implementation of interventions. Overall planning is not adequate. When an outbreak occurs, no authoritative organisation exists to deploy and plan psychological intervention activities in different regions and subordinate departments. Hence, most medical departments start psychological interventional activities independently without communicating with each other, thereby wasting mental health resources, and failing patients in terms of a lack of a timely diagnosis, and poor follow-up for treatments and evaluations. Second, the cooperation between community health services and mental-health-care institutions in some provinces and cites in China has been decoupled. After the assessment of the mental health states of individuals affected by the epidemic, patients cannot be assigned according to the severity of their condition and difficulty of treatment to the appropriate department or professionals for timely and reasonable diagnosis and treatment. And after remission of the viral infection, patients cannot be transferred quickly from a hospital to a community health service institution to receive continuous psychological treatment. Finally, owing to a shortage of professionals, the establishment of psychological intervention teams in many areas is not feasible. Teams might consist of psychological counsellors, nurses, volunteers, or teachers majoring in psychology and other related fields, with no professional and experienced psychologists and psychiatrists. One individual often has multiple responsibilities, which can reduce the effectiveness of interventions. This situation can be resolved by improving relevant policies, strengthening personnel training, optimising organisational and management policies, and constantly reviewing experiences in practice. In the National Health Commission guidelines, 1 key points were formulated for different groups, including patients with confirmed and suspected infections, medical care and related personnel, those who had close contacts with patients (eg, family members, colleagues, friends), people who refused to seek medical treatment, susceptible groups (eg, older people, children, and pregnant women), and the general public. With disease progression, clinical symptoms become severe and psychological problems in infected patients will change; therefore, psychological intervention measures should be targeted and adapted as appropriate. Studies have confirmed that individuals who have experienced public health emergencies still have varying degrees of stress disorders, even after the event is over, or they have been cured and discharged from hospital, indicating these individuals should not be ignored.7, 8 Therefore, we should consider the disease course, severity of clinical symptoms, place of treatment (eg, isolated at home, ordinary isolation ward, intensive care unit), and other factors to classify individuals who need psychological intervention and to formulate specific measures to improve the effectiveness of these interventions. Under strict infection measures, non-essential personnel such as clinical psychiatrists, psychologists, and mental health social workers, are strongly discouraged from entering isolation wards for patients with COVID-19. Therefore, frontline health-care workers become the main personnel providing psychological interventions to patients in hospitals. For individuals with a suspected infection who are under quarantine or at home, community health service personnel should provide primary medical care and mental health care. However, because of complicated work procedures, heavy workloads, and a lack of standardised training in psychiatry or clinical psychology, community health service personnel do not always know how to mitigate the psychological distress of patients. A professional team comprising mental health personnel is a basic tenet in dealing with emotional distress and other mental disorders caused by epidemics and other public health emergencies. The national mental health working plan (2015–20) reported that 27 733 licensed psychiatrists (1·49 per 100 000 population), 57 591 psychiatric nurses, and more than 5 000 psychotherapists worked in China in 2015. 9 By the end of 2017, the number of licensed psychiatrists had increased to 33 400, and the number of psychotherapists, social workers, and psychological counsellors was also increasing year by year, 10 but their numbers were still too few to meet the needs of patients with mental disorders. Hence, training of mental health professionals at different levels is urgently required by the Chinese Government. Interventions should be based on a comprehensive assessment of risk factors leading to psychological issues, including poor mental health before a crisis, bereavement, injury to self or family members, life-threatening circumstances, panic, separation from family and low household income. 11 Any major epidemic outbreak will have negative effects on individuals and society. Lessons learned from terrorist events at the Pentagon and anthrax attacks in the USA showed the importance of pre-establishing community coalitions to mobilise resources efficiently and effectively and to respond successfully to the disaster-related mental health needs of affected individuals. 12 Planning of psychological interventions in China is usually done passively; few preventive measures are implemented before the occurrence of serious psychological issues caused by acute emergency events. The outbreak of COVID-19 has shown many problems with the provision of psychological intervention in China. Here we have suggested ways that the government could establish and improve the intervention system based on sound scientific advice, to effectively deal with the mental health problems caused by public health emergencies. © 2020 Pasieka 2020 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mental health services for older adults in China during the COVID-19 outbreak

              Over the past several weeks, the total number of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the number of associated deaths has been increasing. Of the deaths caused by COVID-19, most were older adults. 1 China has the largest ageing population globally. In 2017, there were 241 million older adults (>60 years) nationwide, accounting for 17·3% of the total population, 2 of whom around half were empty-nest elderly (ie, without children, or whose children left home and worked elsewhere) with little social support. More than 30 million people were older than 80 years, and more than 40 million required long-term care due to disabilities.2, 3 Mental health problems are common in older Chinese adults (ie, ≥55 years), with the prevalence of depressive symptoms reported to be 23·6% in this population. 4 The rapid transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and high death rate could exacerbate the risk of mental health problems and worsen existing psychiatric symptoms, further impairing their daily functioning and cognition. Public transport in many regions has been suspended to lower the risk of disease transmission; thus, online mental health services have been widely adopted. 5 Older adults have limited access to internet services and smart phones, and as such only a small fraction of older adults can benefit from such service provision. In addition, in most areas of China, clinically stable older adults with psychiatric disorders or their guardians usually need to visit psychiatric outpatient clinics monthly to obtain the maintenance medications. The current mass quarantines and restrictions to public transport have inevitably become a major barrier to access maintenance treatments for this group. The outbreak of COVID-19 has raised great challenges for mental health services for older adults in the community. There seems to be insufficient and inadequate attention paid to this vulnerable population in the recently established crisis psychological services in China. Stakeholders and health policy makers should collaborate to resolve this barrier in order to provide high-quality, timely crisis psychological services to community-dwelling older adults.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Soc Psychiatry
                Int J Soc Psychiatry
                ISP
                spisp
                The International Journal of Social Psychiatry
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0020-7640
                1741-2854
                29 April 2020
                September 2020
                : 66
                : 6
                : 525-527
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, India
                Author notes
                [*]Debanjan Banerjee, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Hosur Road, Bangalore 560029, India. Email: dr.Djan88@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-9798
                Article
                10.1177_0020764020922269
                10.1177/0020764020922269
                7405628
                32349580
                3e8fbc7a-8cf0-4d89-8f71-d4d7ef89140e
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Editorial
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article