14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Progress Toward Regional Measles Elimination — Worldwide, 2000–2019

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2010, the World Health Assembly (WHA) set the following three milestones for measles control to be achieved by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) among children aged 1 year to ≥90% at the national level and to ≥80% in every district, 2) reduce global annual measles incidence to <5 cases per 1 million population, and 3) reduce global measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate* ( 1 ). In 2012, WHA endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan, † with the objective of eliminating measles § in five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. This report describes progress toward WHA milestones and regional measles elimination during 2000–2019 and updates a previous report ( 2 ). During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 72% to 84% but has since plateaued at 84%–85%. All countries conducted measles surveillance; however, approximately half did not achieve the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Annual reported measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 to 18 cases per 1 million population during 2000–2016; the lowest incidence occurred in 2016, but by 2019 incidence had risen to 120 cases per 1 million population. During 2000–2019, the annual number of estimated measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500; an estimated 25.5 million measles deaths were averted. To drive progress toward the regional measles elimination targets, additional strategies are needed to help countries reach all children with 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve surveillance. Immunization Activities WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) determine vaccination coverage using data from administrative records (calculated by dividing the number of vaccine doses administered by the estimated target population, reported annually) and vaccination coverage surveys, to estimate MCV1 and second dose measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) coverage through routine (i.e., not through mass campaigns) immunization services. ¶ During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased worldwide from 72% to 84%; however, coverage has remained at 84%–85% since 2010, with considerable regional variation (Table 1). TABLE 1 Estimates of coverage with the first and second dose of measles-containing vaccine administered through routine immunization services, reported measles cases, and incidence by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000, 2010, 2016, and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Percentage No. of reported measles cases† Measles incidence per 1 million population†,§ MCV1* coverage Countries with ≥90% MCV1 coverage MCV2* coverage Reporting countries with <5 measles cases per 1 million population African 2000 (46) 53 9 5 8 520,102 836 2010 (46) 73 37 4 30 199,174 232 2016 (47) 69 34 23 51 36,269 37 2019 (47) 69 32 33 34 618,595 567 Americas 2000 (35) 93 63 65 89 1,754 2 2010 (35) 93 74 67 100 247 0.3 2016 (35) 92 66 80 100 97 0.1 2019 (35) 88 71 75 91 19,244 28 Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 71 57 28 17 38,592 90 2010 (21) 77 62 52 40 10,072 17 2016 (21) 82 57 74 55 6,275 10 2019 (21) 82 52 75 42 18,458 27 European 2000 (52) 91 62 48 45 37,421 50 2010 (53) 93 83 80 69 30,625 34 2016 (53) 93 81 88 82 4,440 5 2019 (53) 96 85 91 32 105,755 116 South-East Asia 2000 (10) 63 30 3 0 78,558 51 2010 (11) 83 45 15 36 54,228 30 2016 (11) 89 64 75 27 27,530 14 2019 (11) 94 73 83 30 29,239 15 Western Pacific 2000 (27) 85 48 2 30 177,052 105 2010 (27) 96 63 87 68 49,460 27 2016 (27) 96 63 91 68 57,879 31 2019 (27) 94 67 91 46 78,479 41 Totals 2000 (191) 72 45 18 38 853,479 145 2010 (193) 84 63 42 60 343,806 50 2016 (194) 85 61 67 70 132,490 18 2019 (194) 85 63 71 46 869,770 120 Abbreviations: MCV1 = routine first dose of measles-containing vaccine; MCV2 = routine second dose of measles-containing vaccine. * http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en; data as of July 15, 2020. † http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tsincidencemeasles.html; data as of July 15, 2020. § Population data from United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2020. Any country not reporting data on measles cases for that year was removed from both the numerator and denominator in calculating incidence. Among 194 WHO member states, 122 (63% of member states) achieved ≥90% MCV1 coverage in 2019, a 42% increase from 86 (45%) countries in 2000, but a 4% decrease from a peak of 127 (65%) countries in 2012. In 2019, 42 (22%) countries achieved MCV1 coverage ≥90% nationally and ≥80% in all districts**; however, during that year 19.8 million infants did not receive MCV1 through routine immunization services. The six countries with the highest numbers of infants who had not received MCV1 were Nigeria (3.3 million), Ethiopia (1.5 million), Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), India (1.2 million), and Philippines (0.7 million), accounting for nearly half (48%) of the world’s total. Estimated global MCV2 coverage nearly quadrupled from 18% in 2000 to 71% in 2019, largely because of an 86% increase in the number of countries providing MCV2, from 95 (50%) countries in 2000 to 177 (91%) in 2019 (Table 1). Six countries (Cameroon, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mali, Republic of the Congo, and Togo) introduced MCV2 in 2019. Approximately 204 million persons received MCV during supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) †† in 55 countries in 2019; in addition, 9 million persons received MCV during measles outbreak response activities. Reported Measles Incidence In 2019, all 194 countries conducted measles surveillance, and 193 §§ (99%) had access to standardized quality-controlled laboratory testing through the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. In spite of this, however, surveillance remains weak in many countries, and only 81 (52%) of 157 countries that reported discarded ¶¶ cases achieved the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Countries report the number of incident measles cases*** to WHO and UNICEF annually using the Joint Reporting Form. ††† During 2000–2016, the number of reported measles cases decreased 84%, from 853,479 in 2000 to 132,490 in 2016. From 2000 to 2016, annual measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 cases per 1 million (2000) to 18 (2016), the lowest reported incidence during this period; incidence then increased 567% to 120 per million in 2019, the highest since 2001 (Table 1). The percentage of reporting countries with annual measles incidence of <5 cases per 1 million population increased from 38% (64 of 169) in 2000 to 70% (125 of 179) in 2016, but then decreased to 46% (85 of 184) in 2019. The number of measles cases increased 556% from 132,490 in 2016 to 869,770 in 2019, the most reported cases since 1996. Since 2016, the number of reported measles cases increased 1,606% in WHO’s African Region (AFR), 19,739% in the Region of the Americas (AMR), 194% in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), 2,282% in the European Region (EUR), 6% in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), and 36% in the Western Pacific Region (WPR). In 2019, nine (5%) of 184 reporting countries (Central African Republic, DRC, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Madagascar, North Macedonia, Samoa, Tonga, and Ukraine) experienced large outbreaks, and in each of these countries, reported measles incidence exceeded 500 per 1 million population; these nine countries accounted for 631,847 (73%) of all reported cases worldwide during 2019. Genotypes of viruses isolated from persons with measles were reported by 88 (62%) of 141 countries reporting at least one measles case in 2019. From 2005 to 2019, 20 of 24 recognized measles genotypes were eliminated by immunization activities. The number of genotypes detected decreased from 11 during 2005–2008, to eight during 2009–2014, six in 2016, five in 2017, and four during 2018–2019 ( 3 ). In 2019, among 8,728 reported sequences, 1,920 (22%) were genotype B3; six (0.1%) were D4; 6,774 (78%) were D8; and 28 (0.3%) were H1. §§§ Measles Case and Mortality Estimates A previously described model for estimating measles cases and deaths ( 4 ) was updated with annual vaccination coverage data, case data, and United Nations population estimates for all countries during 2000–2019, enabling derivation of a new series of disease and mortality estimates. For countries with anomalous estimates (e.g., a decrease in reported cases, but an increase in estimated deaths, or vice versa), the model was modified slightly to generate mortality estimates consistent with observed cases. Based on updated annual data, the estimated number of measles cases decreased 65%, from 28,340,700 in 2000 to 9,828,400 in 2019. During this period, estimated annual measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500 (Table 2). During 2000–2019, compared with no measles vaccination, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths globally (Figure). TABLE 2 Estimated number of measles cases and deaths,* by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000 and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Estimated no. of measles cases (95% CI) Estimated no. of measles deaths (95% CI) Estimated % measles mortality reduction from 2000 to 2019 Cumulative no. of measles deaths averted by vaccination, 2000–2019 African 2000 (46) 10,727,500 (7,417,700–17,448,900) 346,400 (227,600–569,000) 57 13,620,000 2019 (47) 4,548,000 (3,266,700–8,376,100) 147,900 (99,500–271,100) Americas 2000 (35) 8,800 (4,400–35,000) NA† NA 102,500 2019 (35) 102,700 (51,400–411,000) NA† Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 2,565,800 (1,534,500–4,774,400) 40,000 (22,200–69,200) 33 2,877,900 2019 (21) 1,384,500 (717,900–3,201,000) 27,000 (14,700–49,500) European 2000 (52) 816,600 (216,900–5,116,000) 350 (100–1,900) 66 101,300 2019 (53) 494,600 (192,800–6,571,400) 120 (20–1,700) South-East Asia 2000 (10) 11,379,100 (8,937,200–15,299,200) 141,400 (102,000–194,600) 80 7,387,800 2019 (11) 2,655,000 (902,200–6,886,500) 28,700 (8,400–75,400) Western Pacific 2000 (27) 2,843,000 (1,934,700–22,297,700) 10,900 (5,200–77,300) 65 1,385,500 2019 (27) 643,700 (127,600–18,007,600) 3,800 (500–75,100) Totals 2000 (191) 28,340,700 (20,045,300–64,971,300) 539,000 (357,200–911,900) 62 25,475,000 2019 (194) 9,828,400 (5,258,500–43,453,500) 207,500 (123,100–472,900) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable; UNICEF = United Nations Children’s Fund. * The measles mortality model used to generate estimated measles cases and deaths is rerun each year using the new and revised annual WHO/UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage (WUENIC) data, as well as updated surveillance data; therefore, the estimated number of cases and mortality estimates in this report might differ slightly from those in previous reports. † Estimated measles mortality was too low to allow reliable measurement of mortality reduction. Regional Verification of Measles Elimination By the end of 2019, no WHO region had achieved and maintained measles elimination; 83 (43%) individual countries had been verified by independent regional commissions as having achieved or maintained measles elimination. The two countries verified in 2019 to have achieved elimination were Iran and Sri Lanka. No AFR country has yet been verified as having eliminated measles. The AMR had achieved verification of measles elimination in 2016; however, endemic measles transmission was reestablished in Venezuela in 2018 and in Brazil in 2019. Discussion Despite substantial decreasing global measles incidence and measles-associated mortality during 2000–2016, the global measles resurgence that commenced during 2017–2018 continued in 2019 and marked a significant step backward in progress toward global measles elimination. Compared with the historic low in reported cases in 2016, reported measles cases increased 556% in 2019, with increases in numbers of reported cases and incidence in all WHO regions. Estimated global measles mortality increased nearly 50% since 2016. In all WHO regions, the fundamental cause of the resurgence was a failure to vaccinate, both in recent and past years, causing immunity gaps in both younger and some older age groups. Lessons can be learned from outbreaks in various countries, as well as from notable successes in countries such as China, Colombia, and India ( 5 – 7 ). Identifying and addressing gaps in population immunity will require additional strategies as outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030 ¶¶¶ and the Measles-Rubella Strategic Framework 2021–2030 ( 8 ). In 2019, the global increase in cases was driven by large outbreaks in several countries. Huge outbreaks occurred in DRC and Madagascar during 2018–2019 as a consequence of accumulations of large numbers of measles-susceptible children, which resulted from longstanding extremely low MCV1 coverage, no introduction of MCV2 into the immunization program, and suboptimal SIA implementation. Samoa’s outbreak resulted from a steady decline in MCV1 and MCV2 coverage during 2014–2018, exacerbated by a decline in vaccine confidence after two infant deaths occurred from an error in measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administration ( 9 ). Ukraine’s outbreak was the result of low vaccine confidence among health care professionals, low demand from the public, and challenges with vaccine supply, storage, and handling.**** Brazil’s outbreak was caused by previously unidentified immunity gaps, revealed by sustained transmission following multiple measles virus importations from the outbreak in neighboring Venezuela. †††† Outbreaks must be investigated to understand whether and why communities were missed by vaccination, so that immunization services can be strengthened to close population immunity gaps. Where low vaccination coverage exists in specific populations, assessment of behavioral and social drivers of low coverage is needed to inform the design and implementation of targeted strategies, whether related to practical factors such as limited access to services, or to social influences that affect confidence and motivation to receive vaccination. Programs need to work to achieve and sustain the trust of parents and communities to ensure understanding that receipt of vaccination is in their children’s best interests. Programs should always be well prepared to respond to any vaccine-related adverse event in a timely and effective manner to obviate fears and hesitancy that can erode progress. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, large differences between estimated and reported incidence indicate overall low surveillance sensitivity, making comparisons between regions difficult to interpret. Second, some countries have multiple measles surveillance systems and choose which data to submit to WHO. In 2019, for example, Chad reported 1,882 cases to WHO from one surveillance system, but another surveillance system identified 26,623 suspected measles cases. Finally, the measles mortality model estimates might be biased upward or downward by inaccurate model inputs, including vaccination coverage and surveillance data. In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has produced increased programmatic challenges, leading to fewer children receiving vaccinations and poorer surveillance ( 10 ). Progress toward measles elimination during and after the pandemic will require strategies to integrate catch-up vaccination policies into essential immunization services, assurance of safe provision of services, engagement with communities to regain trust and confidence in the health system, and rapid outbreak response. As outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030, a global immunization strategy for 2021–2030, further progress toward achieving measles elimination goals will require strengthening essential immunization systems to increase 2-dose coverage, identify and close historical immunity gaps through catch-up vaccination to prevent outbreaks, improve surveillance and preparedness for rapidly responding to outbreaks, and leverage measles as a tracer and guide to improving immunization programs ( 8 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? All six World Health Organization (WHO) regions have a measles elimination goal. What is added by this report? During 2000–2016, annual reported measles incidence decreased globally; however, measles incidence increased in all regions during 2017–2019. Since 2000, estimated measles deaths decreased 62% and measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths worldwide. No WHO region has achieved and maintained measles elimination. What are the implications for public health practice? To achieve regional measles elimination goals, additional strategies are needed to help countries strengthen routine immunization systems, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve case-based surveillance. FIGURE Estimated number of annual measles deaths with vaccination and in the absence of vaccination — worldwide, 2000–2019* * Deaths prevented by vaccination are estimated by the area between estimated deaths with vaccination and those without vaccination (cumulative total of 25.5 million deaths prevented during 2000–2019). Vertical bars represent upper and lower 95% confidence intervals around the point estimate. The figure is a line graph showing the estimated number of annual measles deaths worldwide, during 2000–2019, with and without vaccination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of the 2010 global measles mortality reduction goal: results from a model of surveillance data.

          In 2008 all WHO member states endorsed a target of 90% reduction in measles mortality by 2010 over 2000 levels. We developed a model to estimate progress made towards this goal. We constructed a state-space model with population and immunisation coverage estimates and reported surveillance data to estimate annual national measles cases, distributed across age classes. We estimated deaths by applying age-specific and country-specific case-fatality ratios to estimated cases in each age-country class. Estimated global measles mortality decreased 74% from 535,300 deaths (95% CI 347,200-976,400) in 2000 to 139,300 (71,200-447,800) in 2010. Measles mortality was reduced by more than three-quarters in all WHO regions except the WHO southeast Asia region. India accounted for 47% of estimated measles mortality in 2010, and the WHO African region accounted for 36%. Despite rapid progress in measles control from 2000 to 2007, delayed implementation of accelerated disease control in India and continued outbreaks in Africa stalled momentum towards the 2010 global measles mortality reduction goal. Intensified control measures and renewed political and financial commitment are needed to achieve mortality reduction targets and lay the foundation for future global eradication of measles. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (PMS 5U66/IP000161). Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Progress Toward Regional Measles Elimination — Worldwide, 2000–2018

            In 2010, the World Health Assembly (WHA) set the following three milestones for measles control to be achieved by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) among children aged 1 year to ≥90% at the national level and to ≥80% in every district, 2) reduce global annual measles incidence to less than five cases per 1 million population, and 3) reduce global measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate* ( 1 ). In 2012, WHA endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan, † with the objective of eliminating measles § in five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. This report updates a previous report ( 2 ) and describes progress toward WHA milestones and regional measles elimination during 2000–2018. During 2000–2018, estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 72% to 86%; annual reported measles incidence decreased 66%, from 145 to 49 cases per 1 million population; and annual estimated measles deaths decreased 73%, from 535,600 to 142,300. During 2000–2018, measles vaccination averted an estimated 23.2 million deaths. However, the number of measles cases in 2018 increased 167% globally compared with 2016, and estimated global measles mortality has increased since 2017. To continue progress toward the regional measles elimination targets, resource commitments are needed to strengthen routine immunization systems, close historical immunity gaps, and improve surveillance. To achieve measles elimination, all communities and countries need coordinated efforts aiming to reach ≥95% coverage with 2 doses of measles vaccine ( 3 ). Immunization Activities WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) use data from administrative records and vaccination coverage surveys reported annually to estimate MCV1 and second dose (MCV2) coverage through routine immunization services. ¶ During 2000–2018, estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 72% to 86% (Table), although coverage has remained at 84%–86% since 2010, with considerable regional variation. Since 2016, MCV1 coverage has remained relatively constant in the African Region (AFR) (74%–75%), the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) (82%–83%), and the South-East Asia Region (SEAR) (88%–89%); and it has remained constant since 2008 in the European Region (EUR) (93%–95%) and in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) (95%–97%). Estimated MCV1 coverage in the Region of the Americas (AMR) decreased from 92% in 2016 to 88% in 2017 and increased to 90% in 2018. TABLE Estimates of coverage with the first and second doses of measles-containing vaccine administered through routine immunization services, reported measles cases and incidence, and estimated measles cases and deaths,* by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000 and 2018 WHO region/ Year (no. of countries in region) % MCV1† coverage % countries with ≥90% MCV1 coverage % MCV2† coverage % of reporting countries with 600 per million and accounted for 45% (157,239 cases) of all reported cases worldwide. The percentage of reporting countries with annual measles incidence of 100 importations in 2018 as a consequence of inadequate vaccination coverage, endemic measles virus transmission has been reestablished in the United Kingdom. Countries such as Cambodia, which, through sustained efforts, identified and closed immunity gaps to achieve elimination, but which border countries with ongoing endemic transmission, must remain vigilant to identify and stop measles outbreaks rapidly. Before international travel, travelers from all countries should ensure they have been appropriately vaccinated against measles. Progress toward measles elimination will regress without a unified effort by all communities and countries. Evaluations of routine immunization programs to identify barriers to vaccination indicate that children miss MCV1 and MCV2 doses for many reasons, including families’ limited awareness of the need for vaccination, limited access to or financial barriers to receiving vaccination; vaccine stock-outs; political instability; and vaccine hesitancy and misinformation. WHO’s Global Routine Immunization Strategies and Practices and The Guide to Tailoring Immunization Programmes provides guidance on identifying demand and supply barriers to routine vaccination and strengthening immunization programs ( 8 , 9 ). Outbreaks should serve as opportunities to investigate underlying causes of undervaccination and to design specific routine immunization strengthening activities to prevent future outbreaks. In addition, population immunity gaps should be identified through triangulation of data, including surveillance and vaccination coverage data, and should be targeted by vaccination activities. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, large differences between estimated and reported incidence indicate overall low surveillance sensitivity, making comparisons between regions difficult to interpret. Second, the measles mortality model estimates might be affected by biases in model inputs, including vaccination coverage and surveillance data. The trends of increasing measles incidence and mortality are reversible; however, further progress toward achieving elimination goals will require 1) resource commitments to strengthen routine immunization systems, close historical immunity gaps, and improve surveillance to rapidly detect and respond to cases, and 2) a new perspective to use measles as a stimulus and guide to improving immunization programs. To achieve measles elimination, all communities and countries need coordinated efforts aiming to reach ≥95% coverage with 2 doses of measles vaccine. As the period covered by the Global Vaccine Action Plan 2012–2020 approaches its end, a new vision and strategy for accelerated progress on immunization for 2021–2030 is being developed by countries and stakeholders ( 10 ). Pillars of this evolving strategy include commitment and demand, research and innovation, life course and integration, and supply and sustainability; all of these are vital to achieving and maintaining measles elimination. This new agenda should be used to secure the necessary resource commitments to improve coverage and equity substantially and, in so doing, further progress toward achieving the measles elimination goals. Summary What is already known about this topic? In 2012, the World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan; countries in all six World Health Organization regions have adopted goals to eliminate measles by 2020. What is added by this report? During 2000–2018, annual reported measles incidence decreased 66%, and annual estimated measles deaths decreased 73%. Since 2000, measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 23.2 million deaths globally. However, measles incidence increased in five regions during 2016–2018. What are the implications for public health practice? To achieve regional measles elimination goals, resource commitments are needed to strengthen routine immunization systems, close immunity gaps, and improve case-based surveillance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Genetic Characterization of Measles and Rubella Viruses Detected Through Global Measles and Rubella Elimination Surveillance, 2016–2018

              All six World Health Organization (WHO) regions have established measles elimination goals, and three regions have a rubella elimination goal. Each region has established a regional verification commission to monitor progress toward measles elimination, rubella elimination, or both, and to provide verification of elimination* ( 1 , 2 ). To verify elimination, high-quality case-based surveillance is essential, including laboratory confirmation of suspected cases and genotyping of viruses from confirmed cases to track transmission pathways. In 2000, WHO established the Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) to provide high-quality laboratory support for surveillance for measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome ( 3 ). GMRLN is the largest globally coordinated laboratory network, with 704 laboratories supporting surveillance in 191 countries ( 4 ). This report updates a previous report and describes the genetic characterization of measles and rubella viruses during 2016–2018 ( 5 ). The genetic diversity of measles viruses (MeVs) and rubella viruses (RuVs) has decreased globally following implementation of measles and rubella elimination strategies. Among 10,857 MeV sequences reported to the global Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database during 2016–2018, the number of MeV genotypes detected in ongoing transmission decreased from six in 2016 to four in 2018. Among the 1,296 RuV sequences submitted to the global Rubella Nucleotide Surveillance (RubeNS) database during the same period, the number of RuV genotypes detected decreased from five in 2016 to two in 2018. To strengthen laboratory surveillance for measles and rubella elimination, specimens should be collected from all confirmed cases for genotyping, and sequences from all wild-type measles and rubella viruses should be submitted to MeaNS and RubeNS in a timely manner. Laboratory Surveillance for Measles and Rubella Viruses Countries report data from measles and rubella cases identified through laboratory-supported case-based surveillance systems to WHO. Laboratory testing includes both serologic and molecular confirmation of suspected cases and genetic characterization of viruses from confirmed cases. Participating GMRLN laboratories report MeV and RuV sequence data † from confirmed cases to MeaNS and RubeNS databases, which were initiated in 2005 as a joint project between Public Health England and WHO. § In addition to the reported sequence data from GMRLN, sequences also are downloaded from GenBank, the genetic database maintained by the National Institutes of Health. ¶ To ensure the quality of sequence information, GMRLN has established a molecular proficiency testing program and has accredited 86 laboratories within the six WHO regions for MeV and RuV detection and genotyping ( 6 ). According to the monthly reports of 184 countries that reported measles and rubella case-based surveillance data in 2018, a total of 317,445 serum specimens were received by the participating GMRLN laboratories from patients with suspected cases, an increase of 101% compared with the number of specimens received in 2016. Among 275,020 (87%) specimens tested for measles immunoglobulin M, 78,950 (29%) were positive; 203,898 (64%) also were tested for rubella immunoglobulin M, and 11,874 (6%) were positive. By the end of 2018, MeaNS contained 47,521 MeV sequences, a 93% increase from the 24,571 sequences reported as of July 1, 2015 ( 5 ). During this time, the number of RuV sequences in RubeNS increased 73%, from 1,820 to 3,149. Characterization of Measles and Rubella Viruses In addition to monitoring the occurrence and distribution of MeV and RuV genotypes, the characterization of individual circulating wild-type MeVs is critical for monitoring progress toward regional elimination goals. One element of the evidence required for the verification of measles elimination is documentation of ≥12 months with no circulation of an endemic lineage of MeV in the presence of a well-performing surveillance system; verification of measles elimination is achieved after ≥36 months of interrupted measles transmission ( 7 ). To describe transmission patterns of defined lineages of MeV, GMRLN established standard methods for naming the genetic characteristics of wild-type MeVs derived from the 450 nucleotides sequence encoding the 150 carboxy-terminal amino acids of the N protein (N450), a highly variable region of the genome, including a convention for nominating specific N450 sequences as “named strains” ( 5 ). Each N450 sequence submitted to MeaNS is assigned a distinct sequence identifier (DSId), allowing viruses with identical N450 sequences to be identified. An index for the diversity of each MeV genotype reported to MeaNS, defined as the number of distinct sequences divided by the total number of records in the database, is calculated. If multiple MeV cases (generally ≥50) with the same DSId are associated with extensive transmission in multiple countries, and if the sequence has been made publicly available by submission to GenBank, then members of GMRLN can request that the N450 sequence be nominated as a named strain. Generally, the name assigned is the WHO name of the earliest example of the strain within MeaNS and does not imply any epidemiologic significance regarding the source of infection. During 2016–2018, six of the 24 recognized MeV genotypes were detected (Figure). The number of MeV genotypes detected decreased from six (B3, D4, D5, D8, D9, and H1) in 2016 to four (B3, D4, D8, and H1) in 2018 (Table 1). The number of reported cases of MeV genotype H1, which is endemic in China, declined 87%, from 2,625 in 2016 to 333; in 2018, genotypes B3 and D8 accounted for 95% of reported sequences. FIGURE Global distribution of measles virus genotypes,* 2016–2018 * The size of the circles reflects the numbers of replicates reported for each genotype. The figure is a map showing global distribution of measles virus genotypes during 2016–2018. Source: World Health Organization TABLE 1 Measles virus genotypes, distinct N450* sequences, diversity index,† and rubella virus genotypes reported globally — Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database and Rubella Nucleotide Surveillance database, 2016–2018 Genotype 2016 2017 2018 No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index Measles virus B3 705 (14) 96 0.136 2,665 (45) 170 0.064 2,923 (44) 219 0.075 D4 51 (1) 7 0.137 15 (<1) 6 0.400 19 (<1) 2 0.105 D5 1 (<1) 1 1.000 N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D D8 1,541 (31) 166 0.108 2,561 (44) 208 0.081 3,396 (51) 281 0.083 D9 96 (2) 11 0.115 46 (<1) 5 0.109 N/D N/D N/D H1 2,625 (52) 204 0.078 544 (9) 70 0.129 333 (5) 40 0.120 Total 5,019 (100) 485 N/A 5,831 (100) 459 N/A 6,671 (100) 542 N/A Rubella virus 1E 10 (4) N/A N/A 13 (7) N/A N/A 933 (88) N/A N/A 1G 6 (3) N/A N/A 2 (1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 1H 1 (<1) N/A N/A 1 (<1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 1J 1 (<1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 2B 221 (92) N/A N/A 172 (91) N/A N/A 130 (12) N/A N/A Total 239 (100) N/A N/A 188 (100) N/A N/A 1,063 (100) N/A N/A Abbreviations: DSIds = distinct sequence identifiers; N/A = not applicable; N/D = genotype not detected. * N450: Sequences for the 450-nucleotide carboxy-terminal of the nucleocapsid gene in the measles virus genome. Data from the MeaNS database is available at http://www.who-measles.org/Public/Web_Front/main.php. † The diversity index for each measles virus genotype reported to MeaNs is defined as the number of distinct sequence identifiers divided by the total number of records. Also, during 2016–2018, the diversity index decreased for each detected genotype, except for genotype H1, as the number of circulating genotype H1 viruses decreased by 87%. During 2016–2018, 32 named strains were identified (five for genotype B3, 11 for genotype D4, eight for genotype D8, two for genotype D9, and six for genotype H1). Among the 10 most commonly reported named strains, two appeared in all six regions (Table 2). TABLE 2 The 10 most common distinct N450* measles virus (MeV) sequences (named strains) reported globally — Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database, 2016–2018 DSId* MeV genotype MeV strain name No. of records No. of countries No. of WHO regions 4299 B3 MVs/Dublin.IRL/8.16/ 2,719 43 4 4221 D8 MVs/Osaka.JPN/29.15/ 1,235 32 6 2668 H1 MVs/Hong Kong.CHN/49.12/ 1,149 9 4 4807 D8 MVs/Herborn.DEU/05.17/ 900 15 3 4683 D8 MVs/Gir Somnath.IND/42.16/ 814 36 4 5096 B3 MVs/Saint Denis.FRA/36.17 567 18 3 4283 D8 MVs/Cambridge.GBR/5.16/ 561 20 3 2283 D8 MVi/Hulu Langat.MYS/26.11/ 494 30 6 2728 H1 MVs/Aichi.JPN/9.13/ 388 3 2 4742 D8 MVs/Samut Sakhon.THA/49.16 355 20 4 Abbreviations: DSId = distinct sequence identifier; WHO = World Health Organization. * N450: sequences for the 450-nucleotide carboxy-terminal of the nucleocapsid gene in the MeV genome. Data from the MeaNS database is available at http://www.who-measles.org/Public/Web_Front/main.php. During 2016–2018, five of the 13 recognized RuV genotypes were detected, and the number of detected RuV genotypes decreased from five in 2016 (58% of the sequences belonged to genotype 1E and 40% to genotype 2B) to two (1E and 2B) in 2018 (Table 1). However, global virologic surveillance for rubella is incomplete. With the exception of the Region of the Americas, which has eliminated rubella, the virus remains endemic in all regions. Among 866 sequences reported to RubeNS in 2018, 837 (96.6%) came from the Western Pacific Region (primarily from China and Japan); the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions, two regions with large numbers of reported confirmed rubella cases, were not represented in the RubeNS database in 2018. Discussion GMRLN continues to provide high-quality laboratory support to surveillance for measles and rubella virus transmission and critical evidence needed for the verification of elimination. The increase in serologic testing and the number of sequences reported to the databases reflect an expansion of the capacity of GMRLN as well as the resurgence of measles in many countries during 2018. With support of the molecular surveillance data provided by GMRLN, measles elimination has been verified by 81 (42%) of the 194 WHO member countries and rubella by 76 (39%) of the 194 countries.** Moreover, the decreasing diversity indices for the most frequently detected MeV genotypes suggest that the number of chains of transmission is decreasing globally because of increasing population immunity. However, many countries reporting laboratory-confirmed measles and rubella cases have failed to collect specimens for genetic characterization, particularly during outbreaks. With only four remaining MeV genotypes detected in circulation and a decrease in sequence variability within MeV genotypes, increases in specimen collection and reporting of sequences to MeaNS from countries with confirmed measles cases are needed to better track MeV transmission patterns. In addition, most countries still have not submitted sufficient sequence information to provide adequate baseline genetic characterization of RuVs. The MeaNS database recognizes distinct N450 sequences and assigns DSIds to enable the identification of related MeVs in different countries and regions. In addition, a convention of naming the MeV strains with the same DSId is used. However, when defining endemic circulation of a specific MeV strain, caution should be exercised in interpreting the significance of MeV N450 sequences with different DSIds, named strains, or both. Given the conserved nature of the MeV genome, even within the highly variable N450 coding region, identical N450 sequences can be detected over multiple years and thus might not be linked or in the same direct line of transmission within a country or region. Conversely, sequences with a single nucleotide difference within an identified short chain of MeV transmission will be given different DSIds, with different names, even though they might be epidemiologically linked. The current naming convention does not describe MeV lineages derived from sequence analysis of regions of the MeV genome other than N450. To further differentiate viral transmission chains, additional sequence information from other regions of the genome is needed. Using an expanded sequence window in addition to the N450 sequence has been proposed for countries and regions where measles has been eliminated or is nearing elimination ( 8 ). To improve the utility of these expanded sequence windows, Public Health England is developing updated versions of the MeaNS and RubeNS databases, along with analysis tools that should be available by the end of 2019. Distinct lineages within RuV genotypes have been described ( 9 ); however, WHO has not yet recommended a nomenclature for describing these lineages. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, sequences representing chains of transmission in countries with inadequate virologic surveillance are not represented in the global databases. Second, the geographical distribution of sequences reported to the global databases does not align with the distribution of reported measles and rubella cases. To provide a more comprehensive overview of circulating viruses and their temporal and geographic distribution, strengthening of case-based surveillance by national programs is essential. WHO’s Manual for the Laboratory-based Surveillance of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome provides guidance for increasing specimen collection for virus detection and sequencing ( 6 ). Countries moving toward elimination are recommended to obtain genotype information from ≥80% of all chains of transmission (i.e., outbreaks or case clusters) ( 6 ). Once identified by national or regional GMRLN laboratories, all sequences from wild-type MeVs should be submitted to MeaNS and RuVs to RubeNS within 2 months of specimen receipt in the laboratory. Sequences reported in countries should be linked to named strains if possible. When feasible, supplementary information (e.g., travel history, source of infection, and location) should be submitted with sequence information. With increased sequence reporting and use of new sequencing approaches, GMRLN will provide enhanced support for monitoring progress toward and verifying achievement of measles and rubella elimination. Summary What is already known about this topic? Monitoring progress toward measles and rubella elimination requires high-quality case-based surveillance, including genetic characterization of measles viruses and rubella viruses. What is added by this report? During 2016–2018, the number of reported measles virus genotypes declined from six to four; two (B3 and D8) accounted for 95% of reported sequences. Of 13 rubella virus genotypes, reported genotypes declined from five to two. What are the implications for public health practice? Diversity of measles and rubella viruses has decreased globally, consistent with progress toward elimination. Continued collection of specimens from all confirmed cases for genotyping and submission of wild-type virus sequences to global databases will strengthen case-based surveillance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                13 November 2020
                13 November 2020
                : 69
                : 45
                : 1700-1705
                Affiliations
                Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, CDC; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Minal K. Patel, patelm@ 123456who.int .
                Article
                mm6945a6
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a6
                7660667
                33180759
                81baff68-75d9-4bfe-ad29-f3bbdfe15d47

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article