28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetic Characterization of Measles and Rubella Viruses Detected Through Global Measles and Rubella Elimination Surveillance, 2016–2018

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          All six World Health Organization (WHO) regions have established measles elimination goals, and three regions have a rubella elimination goal. Each region has established a regional verification commission to monitor progress toward measles elimination, rubella elimination, or both, and to provide verification of elimination* ( 1 , 2 ). To verify elimination, high-quality case-based surveillance is essential, including laboratory confirmation of suspected cases and genotyping of viruses from confirmed cases to track transmission pathways. In 2000, WHO established the Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) to provide high-quality laboratory support for surveillance for measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome ( 3 ). GMRLN is the largest globally coordinated laboratory network, with 704 laboratories supporting surveillance in 191 countries ( 4 ). This report updates a previous report and describes the genetic characterization of measles and rubella viruses during 2016–2018 ( 5 ). The genetic diversity of measles viruses (MeVs) and rubella viruses (RuVs) has decreased globally following implementation of measles and rubella elimination strategies. Among 10,857 MeV sequences reported to the global Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database during 2016–2018, the number of MeV genotypes detected in ongoing transmission decreased from six in 2016 to four in 2018. Among the 1,296 RuV sequences submitted to the global Rubella Nucleotide Surveillance (RubeNS) database during the same period, the number of RuV genotypes detected decreased from five in 2016 to two in 2018. To strengthen laboratory surveillance for measles and rubella elimination, specimens should be collected from all confirmed cases for genotyping, and sequences from all wild-type measles and rubella viruses should be submitted to MeaNS and RubeNS in a timely manner. Laboratory Surveillance for Measles and Rubella Viruses Countries report data from measles and rubella cases identified through laboratory-supported case-based surveillance systems to WHO. Laboratory testing includes both serologic and molecular confirmation of suspected cases and genetic characterization of viruses from confirmed cases. Participating GMRLN laboratories report MeV and RuV sequence data † from confirmed cases to MeaNS and RubeNS databases, which were initiated in 2005 as a joint project between Public Health England and WHO. § In addition to the reported sequence data from GMRLN, sequences also are downloaded from GenBank, the genetic database maintained by the National Institutes of Health. ¶ To ensure the quality of sequence information, GMRLN has established a molecular proficiency testing program and has accredited 86 laboratories within the six WHO regions for MeV and RuV detection and genotyping ( 6 ). According to the monthly reports of 184 countries that reported measles and rubella case-based surveillance data in 2018, a total of 317,445 serum specimens were received by the participating GMRLN laboratories from patients with suspected cases, an increase of 101% compared with the number of specimens received in 2016. Among 275,020 (87%) specimens tested for measles immunoglobulin M, 78,950 (29%) were positive; 203,898 (64%) also were tested for rubella immunoglobulin M, and 11,874 (6%) were positive. By the end of 2018, MeaNS contained 47,521 MeV sequences, a 93% increase from the 24,571 sequences reported as of July 1, 2015 ( 5 ). During this time, the number of RuV sequences in RubeNS increased 73%, from 1,820 to 3,149. Characterization of Measles and Rubella Viruses In addition to monitoring the occurrence and distribution of MeV and RuV genotypes, the characterization of individual circulating wild-type MeVs is critical for monitoring progress toward regional elimination goals. One element of the evidence required for the verification of measles elimination is documentation of ≥12 months with no circulation of an endemic lineage of MeV in the presence of a well-performing surveillance system; verification of measles elimination is achieved after ≥36 months of interrupted measles transmission ( 7 ). To describe transmission patterns of defined lineages of MeV, GMRLN established standard methods for naming the genetic characteristics of wild-type MeVs derived from the 450 nucleotides sequence encoding the 150 carboxy-terminal amino acids of the N protein (N450), a highly variable region of the genome, including a convention for nominating specific N450 sequences as “named strains” ( 5 ). Each N450 sequence submitted to MeaNS is assigned a distinct sequence identifier (DSId), allowing viruses with identical N450 sequences to be identified. An index for the diversity of each MeV genotype reported to MeaNS, defined as the number of distinct sequences divided by the total number of records in the database, is calculated. If multiple MeV cases (generally ≥50) with the same DSId are associated with extensive transmission in multiple countries, and if the sequence has been made publicly available by submission to GenBank, then members of GMRLN can request that the N450 sequence be nominated as a named strain. Generally, the name assigned is the WHO name of the earliest example of the strain within MeaNS and does not imply any epidemiologic significance regarding the source of infection. During 2016–2018, six of the 24 recognized MeV genotypes were detected (Figure). The number of MeV genotypes detected decreased from six (B3, D4, D5, D8, D9, and H1) in 2016 to four (B3, D4, D8, and H1) in 2018 (Table 1). The number of reported cases of MeV genotype H1, which is endemic in China, declined 87%, from 2,625 in 2016 to 333; in 2018, genotypes B3 and D8 accounted for 95% of reported sequences. FIGURE Global distribution of measles virus genotypes,* 2016–2018 * The size of the circles reflects the numbers of replicates reported for each genotype. The figure is a map showing global distribution of measles virus genotypes during 2016–2018. Source: World Health Organization TABLE 1 Measles virus genotypes, distinct N450* sequences, diversity index,† and rubella virus genotypes reported globally — Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database and Rubella Nucleotide Surveillance database, 2016–2018 Genotype 2016 2017 2018 No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index No. of records (%) No. of DSIds Diversity index Measles virus B3 705 (14) 96 0.136 2,665 (45) 170 0.064 2,923 (44) 219 0.075 D4 51 (1) 7 0.137 15 (<1) 6 0.400 19 (<1) 2 0.105 D5 1 (<1) 1 1.000 N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D D8 1,541 (31) 166 0.108 2,561 (44) 208 0.081 3,396 (51) 281 0.083 D9 96 (2) 11 0.115 46 (<1) 5 0.109 N/D N/D N/D H1 2,625 (52) 204 0.078 544 (9) 70 0.129 333 (5) 40 0.120 Total 5,019 (100) 485 N/A 5,831 (100) 459 N/A 6,671 (100) 542 N/A Rubella virus 1E 10 (4) N/A N/A 13 (7) N/A N/A 933 (88) N/A N/A 1G 6 (3) N/A N/A 2 (1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 1H 1 (<1) N/A N/A 1 (<1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 1J 1 (<1) N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A N/D N/A N/A 2B 221 (92) N/A N/A 172 (91) N/A N/A 130 (12) N/A N/A Total 239 (100) N/A N/A 188 (100) N/A N/A 1,063 (100) N/A N/A Abbreviations: DSIds = distinct sequence identifiers; N/A = not applicable; N/D = genotype not detected. * N450: Sequences for the 450-nucleotide carboxy-terminal of the nucleocapsid gene in the measles virus genome. Data from the MeaNS database is available at http://www.who-measles.org/Public/Web_Front/main.php. † The diversity index for each measles virus genotype reported to MeaNs is defined as the number of distinct sequence identifiers divided by the total number of records. Also, during 2016–2018, the diversity index decreased for each detected genotype, except for genotype H1, as the number of circulating genotype H1 viruses decreased by 87%. During 2016–2018, 32 named strains were identified (five for genotype B3, 11 for genotype D4, eight for genotype D8, two for genotype D9, and six for genotype H1). Among the 10 most commonly reported named strains, two appeared in all six regions (Table 2). TABLE 2 The 10 most common distinct N450* measles virus (MeV) sequences (named strains) reported globally — Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) database, 2016–2018 DSId* MeV genotype MeV strain name No. of records No. of countries No. of WHO regions 4299 B3 MVs/Dublin.IRL/8.16/ 2,719 43 4 4221 D8 MVs/Osaka.JPN/29.15/ 1,235 32 6 2668 H1 MVs/Hong Kong.CHN/49.12/ 1,149 9 4 4807 D8 MVs/Herborn.DEU/05.17/ 900 15 3 4683 D8 MVs/Gir Somnath.IND/42.16/ 814 36 4 5096 B3 MVs/Saint Denis.FRA/36.17 567 18 3 4283 D8 MVs/Cambridge.GBR/5.16/ 561 20 3 2283 D8 MVi/Hulu Langat.MYS/26.11/ 494 30 6 2728 H1 MVs/Aichi.JPN/9.13/ 388 3 2 4742 D8 MVs/Samut Sakhon.THA/49.16 355 20 4 Abbreviations: DSId = distinct sequence identifier; WHO = World Health Organization. * N450: sequences for the 450-nucleotide carboxy-terminal of the nucleocapsid gene in the MeV genome. Data from the MeaNS database is available at http://www.who-measles.org/Public/Web_Front/main.php. During 2016–2018, five of the 13 recognized RuV genotypes were detected, and the number of detected RuV genotypes decreased from five in 2016 (58% of the sequences belonged to genotype 1E and 40% to genotype 2B) to two (1E and 2B) in 2018 (Table 1). However, global virologic surveillance for rubella is incomplete. With the exception of the Region of the Americas, which has eliminated rubella, the virus remains endemic in all regions. Among 866 sequences reported to RubeNS in 2018, 837 (96.6%) came from the Western Pacific Region (primarily from China and Japan); the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions, two regions with large numbers of reported confirmed rubella cases, were not represented in the RubeNS database in 2018. Discussion GMRLN continues to provide high-quality laboratory support to surveillance for measles and rubella virus transmission and critical evidence needed for the verification of elimination. The increase in serologic testing and the number of sequences reported to the databases reflect an expansion of the capacity of GMRLN as well as the resurgence of measles in many countries during 2018. With support of the molecular surveillance data provided by GMRLN, measles elimination has been verified by 81 (42%) of the 194 WHO member countries and rubella by 76 (39%) of the 194 countries.** Moreover, the decreasing diversity indices for the most frequently detected MeV genotypes suggest that the number of chains of transmission is decreasing globally because of increasing population immunity. However, many countries reporting laboratory-confirmed measles and rubella cases have failed to collect specimens for genetic characterization, particularly during outbreaks. With only four remaining MeV genotypes detected in circulation and a decrease in sequence variability within MeV genotypes, increases in specimen collection and reporting of sequences to MeaNS from countries with confirmed measles cases are needed to better track MeV transmission patterns. In addition, most countries still have not submitted sufficient sequence information to provide adequate baseline genetic characterization of RuVs. The MeaNS database recognizes distinct N450 sequences and assigns DSIds to enable the identification of related MeVs in different countries and regions. In addition, a convention of naming the MeV strains with the same DSId is used. However, when defining endemic circulation of a specific MeV strain, caution should be exercised in interpreting the significance of MeV N450 sequences with different DSIds, named strains, or both. Given the conserved nature of the MeV genome, even within the highly variable N450 coding region, identical N450 sequences can be detected over multiple years and thus might not be linked or in the same direct line of transmission within a country or region. Conversely, sequences with a single nucleotide difference within an identified short chain of MeV transmission will be given different DSIds, with different names, even though they might be epidemiologically linked. The current naming convention does not describe MeV lineages derived from sequence analysis of regions of the MeV genome other than N450. To further differentiate viral transmission chains, additional sequence information from other regions of the genome is needed. Using an expanded sequence window in addition to the N450 sequence has been proposed for countries and regions where measles has been eliminated or is nearing elimination ( 8 ). To improve the utility of these expanded sequence windows, Public Health England is developing updated versions of the MeaNS and RubeNS databases, along with analysis tools that should be available by the end of 2019. Distinct lineages within RuV genotypes have been described ( 9 ); however, WHO has not yet recommended a nomenclature for describing these lineages. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, sequences representing chains of transmission in countries with inadequate virologic surveillance are not represented in the global databases. Second, the geographical distribution of sequences reported to the global databases does not align with the distribution of reported measles and rubella cases. To provide a more comprehensive overview of circulating viruses and their temporal and geographic distribution, strengthening of case-based surveillance by national programs is essential. WHO’s Manual for the Laboratory-based Surveillance of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome provides guidance for increasing specimen collection for virus detection and sequencing ( 6 ). Countries moving toward elimination are recommended to obtain genotype information from ≥80% of all chains of transmission (i.e., outbreaks or case clusters) ( 6 ). Once identified by national or regional GMRLN laboratories, all sequences from wild-type MeVs should be submitted to MeaNS and RuVs to RubeNS within 2 months of specimen receipt in the laboratory. Sequences reported in countries should be linked to named strains if possible. When feasible, supplementary information (e.g., travel history, source of infection, and location) should be submitted with sequence information. With increased sequence reporting and use of new sequencing approaches, GMRLN will provide enhanced support for monitoring progress toward and verifying achievement of measles and rubella elimination. Summary What is already known about this topic? Monitoring progress toward measles and rubella elimination requires high-quality case-based surveillance, including genetic characterization of measles viruses and rubella viruses. What is added by this report? During 2016–2018, the number of reported measles virus genotypes declined from six to four; two (B3 and D8) accounted for 95% of reported sequences. Of 13 rubella virus genotypes, reported genotypes declined from five to two. What are the implications for public health practice? Diversity of measles and rubella viruses has decreased globally, consistent with progress toward elimination. Continued collection of specimens from all confirmed cases for genotyping and submission of wild-type virus sequences to global databases will strengthen case-based surveillance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic diversity of wild-type measles viruses and the global measles nucleotide surveillance database (MeaNS).

          (2015)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network Support for Elimination Goals, 2010-2015.

            In 2012, the World Health Assembly endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP)* with the objective to eliminate measles and rubella in five World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. In September 2013, countries in all six WHO regions had established measles elimination goals, and additional goals for elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome were established in three regions (1). Capacity for surveillance, including laboratory confirmation, is fundamental to monitoring and verifying elimination. The 2012-2020 Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan of the Measles and Rubella Initiative(†) calls for effective case-based surveillance with laboratory testing for case confirmation (2). In 2000, the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (GMRLN) was established to provide high quality laboratory support for surveillance (3). The GMRLN is the largest globally coordinated laboratory network, with 703 laboratories supporting surveillance in 191 countries. During 2010-2015, 742,187 serum specimens were tested, and 27,832 viral sequences were reported globally. Expansion of the capacity of the GMRLN will support measles and rubella elimination efforts as well as surveillance for other vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), including rotavirus, and for emerging pathogens of public health concern.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Progress in Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Control and Elimination — Worldwide, 2000 – 2016

              Although rubella virus infection usually causes a mild fever and rash illness in children and adults, infection during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, stillbirth, or infants with a constellation of congenital malformations known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) ( 1 ). Rubella is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. Preventing these adverse pregnancy outcomes is the focus of rubella vaccination programs. In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated guidance on the preferred strategy for introduction of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into national immunization schedules and recommended an initial vaccination campaign, usually targeting children aged 9 months–14 years ( 1 ). The Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 (GVAP), endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 2012, includes goals to eliminate rubella in at least five of the six WHO regions by 2020 ( 2 ). This report updates a previous report ( 3 ) and summarizes global progress toward rubella and CRS control and elimination from 2000 to 2016. As of December 2016, 152 (78%) of 194 countries had introduced RCV into the national immunization schedule, representing an increase of 53 countries since 2000, including 20 countries that introduced RCV after 2012. Reported rubella cases declined 97%, from 2000 (670,894 cases in 102 countries) to 2016 (22,361 cases in 165 countries). The Region of the Americas has achieved rubella and CRS elimination (verified in 2015). Rubella and CRS elimination goals have been set by the European Region (target date: 2015) and Western Pacific Region (target date to be determined), whereas the South-East Asia Region has a rubella and CRS control target. Neither the African Region nor the Eastern Mediterranean Region has set regional rubella goals or targets. To achieve the 2020 GVAP rubella elimination goals, RCV introduction needs to continue when country criteria indicating readiness for introduction are met, and rubella and CRS surveillance needs to be strengthened to ensure that progress toward elimination targets are measured. Because rubella cases are detected through measles surveillance, and because rubella vaccine is usually delivered as a combined measles-rubella vaccine, elimination activities for both diseases are programmatically linked, and measles elimination activities can be leveraged to support rubella elimination. Rubella and CRS surveillance are necessary to assess disease burden before RCV introduction, to monitor disease burden and epidemiology after introduction, to identify pregnant women infected with rubella virus who require follow-up to assess pregnancy outcomes, and to identify, diagnose, and manage CRS-affected infants. Countries report information on immunization schedules, vaccination campaigns, number of vaccine doses administered through routine immunization services, and other WHO monitoring data ( 4 ) to WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) each year using the Joint Reporting Form (JRF). Surveillance data, including number of cases of rubella and CRS, are also reported to WHO and UNICEF through the JRF using standard case definitions ( 5 ). For this report, JRF data from the period 2000–2016 were analyzed; analyses focused on data from 2000 (initiation of accelerated measles control activities), 2012 (the new phase of rubella elimination), 2014 (the last worldwide update), and 2016 (the most recent data available). Immunization Activities Global coverage with RCV increased from 21% in 2000 to 40% in 2012 and to 47% in 2016. In 2000, just over half (99, 51%) of countries had introduced RCV into their immunization schedule; by the end of 2012, more than two thirds (132, 68%) of countries were using RCV. By 2014, at the time of the last worldwide update ( 3 ), eight additional countries introduced RCV, bringing the total number of countries using RCV to 140 (72%). At that time, 44 of the 54 countries that had not yet introduced RCV were eligible for support from Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi).* During 2015–2016, 12 of these 54 countries introduced RCV, so that by the end of 2016, RCV had been introduced into the routine immunization schedule in 152 (78%) countries, including 13 (28%) in the African Region, 16 (76%) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, eight (73%) in the South-East Asia Region, and all 115 countries in the Region of the Americas, European Region, and Western Pacific Region (Table 1). Among the 12 countries that introduced RCV during 2015–2016, six received Gavi support for the introduction, and six (among the 10 countries not eligible for Gavi support) introduced the vaccine using other support (Figure) (Table 2). TABLE 1 Global progress in rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) control and elimination — World Health Organization (WHO) Regions, 2000, 2012, and 2016 Characteristic WHO region (No. of countries) AFR (47) AMR (35) EMR (21) EUR (53) SEAR (11) WPR (27) Worldwide (194) Regional rubella/CRS target None Elimination None Elimination Control Elimination None No. of countries with RCV in schedule 2000 2 31 12 40 2 12 99 2012 3 35 14 53 5 22 132 2016 13 35 16 53 8 27 152 Regional rubella vaccination coverage (%) 2000 0 85 23 60 3 11 21 2012 0 94 38 95 5 86 40 2016 13 92 46 93 15 96 47 No. of countries reporting rubella cases 2000 7 25 11 41 3 15 102 2012 41 35 19 47 11 23 176 2016 44 30 18 45 11 17 165 No. of reported rubella cases 2000 865 39,228 3,122 621,039 1,165 5,475 670,894 2012 10,850 15 1,681 30,579 6,877 44,275 94,277 2016 4,157 1 2,037 359 10,361 5,446 22,361 No. of countries reporting CRS cases 2000 3 18 6 34 2 12 75 2012 20 35 9 43 6 17 130 2016 21 30 10 42 10 12 125 No. of reported CRS cases 2000 0 80 0 47 26 3 156 2012 69 3 20 62 14 134 302 2016 14 0 9 6 319 19 367 Abbreviations: AFR = African Region; AMR = Region of the Americas; CRS = congenital rubella syndrome; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean Region; EUR = European Region; RCV = rubella-containing vaccine; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WPR = Western Pacific Region. FIGURE Rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) introduction and status of rubella elimination,* by country — World Health Organization, 2016 * Only the European Region and the Region of the Americas had established a process for verifying rubella elimination by July 2017. The figure above is a map of the world, showing 1) countries with rubella-containing vaccine included in the routine immunization schedule and verification that rubella has been eliminated, 2) countries with rubella vaccine included in the routine immunization schedule and no verification that rubella has been eliminated, and 3) countries with rubella not in the schedule. TABLE 2 Characteristics of rubella-containing vaccine introduction by 12 countries that introduced the vaccine during 2015–2016, by characteristics of the introductory campaign — World Health Organization (WHO) Country WHO region Year RCV introduced into routine schedule* Introductory vaccination campaign* Gavi support status for introduction Year Target age group Target population % vaccination coverage by report % vaccination coverage by survey Botswana AFR 2016 2016 9 mos–14 yrs 706,504 95 97 No Burkina Faso AFR 2015 2014 9 mos–14 yrs 8,481,625 106† Not reported Yes Burma SEAR 2015 2015 9mos–14 yrs 13,160,764 94 Not done Yes Namibia AFR 2016 2016 9 mos–39 yrs 1,859,857 103† Not done No Papua New Guinea WPR 2015 2015–2016 9 mos–14 yrs 1,976,335 63 Not done Yes Sao Tome and Principe AFR 2016 2016 9 mos–14 yrs 72,449 107† Not done No Swaziland AFR 2016 2016 9 mos–14 yrs 412,874 90 94 No Timor-Leste SEAR 2016 2015 6 mos–14 yrs 501,832 97 95 No Vanuatu WPR 2015 2015 1–14 yrs 103,676 98 Not done No Vietnam WPR 2015 2014–2015 1–14 yrs 19,740,181 98 Not done Yes Yemen EMR 2015 2014 9 mos–14 yrs 11,368,968 85 Not done Yes Zimbabwe AFR 2015 2015 9 mos–14 yrs 5,203,976 103† Not done Yes Abbreviations: AFR = African Region; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean Region; Gavi = Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; RCV = Rubella-containing vaccine; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WHO = World Health Organization; WPR = Western Pacific Region. *Introductory campaigns and introduction of the vaccine into the routine schedule can occur in different years, with introduction recommended to occur immediately following the campaign. † Values >100% indicate that the intervention reached more persons than the estimated target population. Routine administration of RCV is recommended with the first routine dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) (i.e., as a combination vaccine or simultaneously, at the same visit); this recommendation has been implemented in 144 (95%) of the 152 countries that have introduced the vaccine. Based on individual countries’ MCV vaccination schedules, the first RCV dose is scheduled at age 8–11 months in 27 (18%) countries and at age 12–18 months in 125 (83%) countries. RCV is provided as a combination vaccine with measles vaccine in 30 (20%) countries and combined with measles and mumps vaccine (with or without varicella vaccine) in 122 (80%) countries; one country administers rubella vaccine simultaneously with combined measles and mumps vaccine. Surveillance Activities During 2000–2016, the number of countries reporting rubella cases (including those reporting zero cases) increased 42%, from 102 in 2000 to 176 in 2012, but the number of reporting countries declined 6%, to 165 in 2016 (Table 1). The number of countries reporting CRS cases increased 42%, from 2000 (75 countries) to 2012 (130), then decreased 4% to 125 countries in 2016. The number of reported CRS cases reported increased, especially in the South-East Asia Region, with the establishment of CRS surveillance systems. Among all 152 countries where RCV had been introduced by December 2016, 126 (83%) reported rubella data, and 110 (72%) reported CRS data. In 2016, 22,361 rubella cases were reported to WHO, a 97% decrease from 670,894 cases reported in 2000, and a 76% decrease from 94,277 cases reported in 2012 (Table 1). Two regions (Region of the Americas and European Region) have regional verification commissions to verify rubella elimination. In the Region of the Americas, the last endemic rubella and CRS cases were reported in 2009, and the region was verified free of endemic rubella virus transmission in April 2015 ( 6 ). In the European Region, 33 (62%) of 53 countries were declared free of endemic rubella virus transmission in 2016. The number of rubella virus genotype sequences identified globally from reported rubella cases increased from 33 sequences submitted by six countries in 2000, to 137 sequences submitted by 21 countries in 2012, to 188 sequences submitted by 16 countries in 2016. Of the 13 known genotypes of rubella virus, three genotypes were detected circulating in 2016. Discussion In 2011, a new phase of accelerated rubella control and CRS prevention began, with updated WHO guidance for RCV introduction, Gavi funding for RCV introduction in eligible countries, and establishment of rubella elimination goals in the GVAP. Taking advantage of these opportunities and leveraging measles elimination activities, RCV has been introduced into the national immunization schedules in 53 countries since 2000; 20 (37%) of these countries introduced the vaccine during 2013–2016. By the end of 2016, with technical and financial support from partners, 78% of all countries globally had introduced RCV into their national immunization schedules, advancing progress toward elimination. Although more than three fourths of countries have introduced RCV, because of differences in country population sizes, less than half (47%) of infants worldwide are vaccinated against rubella. Among the 42 countries that have not yet introduced RCV, nine have not achieved >80% coverage with MCV through routine immunization services or vaccination campaigns, which is a prerequisite to ensure safe RCV introduction ( 1 ); therefore, these nine countries need to improve routine immunization services and vaccination campaign quality. Among countries that have achieved at least 80% MCV1 coverage and are deciding whether to introduce RCV, country-specific data on CRS burden is often requested by national advisory groups or program managers to provide justification for long-term sustainable financing of RCV. Among middle-income countries that do not receive significant donor support, the financial sustainability of inclusion of RCV in the national immunization schedule is especially important to determine before embarking on introduction. Once RCV is introduced, optimizing its use is essential to reaching regional and national rubella and CRS control or elimination targets. Among the 152 countries that have introduced RCV, the vaccine was administered with MCV1 in 144 (95%) countries, facilitating the highest possible RCV coverage. In resource-limited settings, identification of the appropriate target age groups is critical to ensure reaching rubella and measles elimination goals, beginning with an introductory RCV mass vaccination campaign. Progress toward achieving the GVAP goal of rubella elimination in five of the six WHO regions by 2020 is not on track. To achieve this goal, the three regions with elimination targets need to interrupt transmission (European and Western Pacific regions) and maintain elimination (Region of the Americas), and two of three regions will need to establish and achieve the elimination target (African, Eastern Mediterranean, and South-East Asia regions). Challenges to achieving rubella elimination goals include civil unrest that limits vaccine delivery, transmission in older populations, vaccine hesitancy in subpopulations, and weak health care service delivery with low routine vaccination coverage ( 7 ). Optimal surveillance for rubella and CRS is essential to monitor the impact of rubella vaccine introduction and to verify progress toward rubella and CRS elimination goals ( 8 ). This requires case-based surveillance, with all cases of febrile rash illness having serum specimens tested to determine if they are measles, rubella, or neither, as well as collecting oropharyngeal specimens to identify the rubella genotypes circulating worldwide. Outbreak investigations can identify immunity gaps, and responses can be targeted to interrupt transmission and achieve and maintain elimination. Surveillance for rubella and CRS and findings from outbreak investigations guide program managers to monitor progress, focus resources to address gaps, and document elimination. The findings in this report are subject to at least one limitation. The quality of surveillance for rubella is suboptimal. Although rubella and measles surveillance are integrated, rubella generally is a milder disease than measles, and infection is subclinical in 30%–50% of cases ( 1 ); therefore surveillance is much less likely to detect rubella than measles. Despite use of standard case definitions, surveillance quality varies among countries, limiting comparisons of surveillance data. Because integrated surveillance for measles and rubella is less sensitive for rubella, surveillance for CRS serves to complement the data to improve the monitoring of rubella disease. The increase in the number of countries introducing RCV into national immunization schedules and eliminating endemic rubella virus transmission and the achievement of rubella elimination in the Region of the Americas, demonstrate progress toward global rubella control and elimination goals. Rubella and measles elimination efforts are synergistic; for example, RCV introduction catch-up campaigns, using a combined measles-rubella vaccine, also address measles immunity gaps. The path forward to reach regional rubella elimination goals is highlighted in recommendations from the Measles and Rubella Global Strategic Plan 2012–2020 Midterm Review ( 7 ) and requires continued improvement of routine immunization services, vaccination campaign quality, and rubella and CRS surveillance. Summary What is already known about this topic? Rubella virus infection is a leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated guidance on the preferred strategy for introduction of rubella-containing vaccine into national routine immunization schedules, including an initial vaccination campaign for children aged 9 months–14 years. Global immunization partners have set targets to eliminate rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in at least five of the six WHO regions by 2020. What is added by this report? During 2000–2106, rubella-containing vaccine was introduced in 53 countries, including 20 introductions after 2012. By December 2016, 152 (78%) of 194 countries were using the vaccine. These introductions and increased rubella vaccine coverage globally resulted in a decrease in reported rubella cases from 670,894 cases in 2000, to 94,277 cases in 2012, to 22,361 cases in 2016. Elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome was verified in the WHO Region of the Americas in 2015, and 33 (62%) of 53 countries in the European Region have now eliminated endemic rubella and congenital rubella syndrome. What are the implications for public health practice? To accelerate rubella elimination and control goals, a strong commitment to introduce rubella-containing vaccine and to achieve high rubella vaccination coverage in routine immunization services is needed in all countries. Countries and international partners should use the opportunity of measles elimination activities to achieve rubella elimination, through continued improvement of routine immunization services, vaccination campaign quality, and rubella and congenital rubella syndrome surveillance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                05 July 2019
                05 July 2019
                : 68
                : 26
                : 587-591
                Affiliations
                Virus Reference Department, Public Health England, Colindale-London, United Kingdom; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, CDC; National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: James L. Goodson, jgoodson@ 123456cdc.gov , 404-639-8170.
                Article
                mm6826a3
                10.15585/mmwr.mm6826a3
                6613570
                31269012
                4f23d199-3b41-4522-9743-096538115f30

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article