5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rates of Undiagnosed Hypertension and Diagnosed Hypertension Without Anti-hypertensive Medication Following the Affordable Care Act

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion improved access to health insurance and health care services. This study assessed whether the rate of patients with undiagnosed hypertension and the rate of patients with hypertension without anti-hypertensive medication decreased post-ACA in community health center (CHC).

          Methods

          We analyzed electronic health record data from 2012 to 2017 for 126,699 CHC patients aged 19–64 years with ≥1 visit pre-ACA and ≥1 post-ACA in 14 Medicaid expansion states. We estimated the prevalence of patients with undiagnosed hypertension (high blood pressure reading without a diagnosis for ≥1 day) and the prevalence of patients with hypertension without anti-hypertensive medication by year and health insurance type (continuously uninsured, continuously insured, gained insurance, and discontinuously insured). We compared the time to diagnosis or to anti-hypertensive medication pre- vs. post-ACA.

          Results

          Overall, 37.3% of patients had undiagnosed hypertension and 27.0% of patients with diagnosed hypertension were without a prescribed anti-hypertensive medication for ≥1 day during the study period. The rate of undiagnosed hypertension decreased from 2012 through 2017. Those who gained insurance had the lowest rates of undiagnosed hypertension (2012: 14.8%; 2017: 6.1%). Patients with hypertension were also more likely to receive anti-hypertension medication during this period, especially uninsured patients who experienced the largest decline (from 47.0% to 8.1%). Post-ACA, among patients with undiagnosed hypertension, time to diagnosis was shorter for those who gained insurance than other insurance types.

          Conclusions

          Those who gained health insurance were appropriately diagnosed with hypertension faster and more frequently post-ACA than those with other insurance types.

          Clinical trials registration

          Trial Number NCT03545763.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update

          Circulation
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015

            Elevated systolic blood (SBP) pressure is a leading global health risk. Quantifying the levels of SBP is important to guide prevention policies and interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trends in Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults With Hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018

              Has blood pressure control changed among adults with hypertension over the past 20 years in the US? In this serial cross-sectional study that included 18 262 US adults aged 18 years or older with hypertension, with data weighted to be representative of the US population, the age-adjusted estimated proportion with controlled blood pressure increased from 31.8% in 1999-2000 to 48.5% in 2007-2008, remained stable through 2013-2014 (53.8%), and then declined to 43.7% in 2017-2018. The prevalence of controlled blood pressure in the US may have decreased from 2013-2014 to 2017-2018. Controlling blood pressure (BP) reduces the risk for cardiovascular disease. To determine whether BP control among US adults with hypertension changed from 1999-2000 through 2017-2018. Serial cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, weighted to be representative of US adults, between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 (10 cycles), including 18 262 US adults aged 18 years or older with hypertension defined as systolic BP level of 140 mm Hg or higher, diastolic BP level of 90 mm Hg or higher, or use of antihypertensive medication. The date of final data collection was 2018. Calendar year. Mean BP was computed using 3 measurements. The primary outcome of BP control was defined as systolic BP level lower than 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP level lower than 90 mm Hg. Among the 51 761 participants included in this analysis, the mean (SD) age was 48 (19) years and 25 939 (50.1%) were women; 43.2% were non-Hispanic White adults; 21.6%, non-Hispanic Black adults; 5.3%, non-Hispanic Asian adults; and 26.1%, Hispanic adults. Among the 18 262 adults with hypertension, the age-adjusted estimated proportion with controlled BP increased from 31.8% (95% CI, 26.9%-36.7%) in 1999-2000 to 48.5% (95% CI, 45.5%-51.5%) in 2007-2008 ( P  < .001 for trend), remained stable and was 53.8% (95% CI, 48.7%-59.0%) in 2013-2014 ( P  = .14 for trend), and then declined to 43.7% (95% CI, 40.2%-47.2%) in 2017-2018 ( P  = .003 for trend). Compared with adults who were aged 18 years to 44 years, it was estimated that controlled BP was more likely among those aged 45 years to 64 years (49.7% vs 36.7%; multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02-1.37]) and less likely among those aged 75 years or older (37.3% vs 36.7%; multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65-0.97]). It was estimated that controlled BP was less likely among non-Hispanic Black adults vs non-Hispanic White adults (41.5% vs 48.2%, respectively; multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96). Controlled BP was more likely among those with private insurance (48.2%), Medicare (53.4%), or government health insurance other than Medicare or Medicaid (43.2%) vs among those without health insurance (24.2%) (multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.08-1.80], 1.47 [95% CI, 1.15-1.89], and 1.36 [95% CI, 1.04-1.76], respectively). Controlled BP was more likely among those with vs those without a usual health care facility (48.4% vs 26.5%, respectively; multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.13-1.94]) and among those who had vs those who had not had a health care visit in the past year (49.1% vs 8.0%; multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio, 5.23 [95% CI, 2.88-9.49]). In a series of cross-sectional surveys weighted to be representative of the adult US population, the prevalence of controlled BP increased between 1999-2000 and 2007-2008, did not significantly change from 2007-2008 through 2013-2014, and then decreased after 2013-2014. This study uses US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data to characterize changes in blood pressure control among adults with hypertension between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 overall and by age, race, insurance type, and health care access.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                American Journal of Hypertension
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0895-7061
                1941-7225
                April 30 2021
                April 30 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
                [2 ]Research Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA
                [3 ]Biostatistics Group, Oregon Health and Science University—Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, USA
                [4 ]Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
                Article
                10.1093/ajh/hpab069
                33929496
                80e54fe7-a994-4f50-92bb-5bf0d223b139
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article