17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      For submission information please click on this link: https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/service/for-journal-authors

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Measuring a Mastery Goal Structure Using the TARGET Framework : Development and Validation of a Classroom Goal Structure Questionnaire

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. In prior research, goal structures have been measured as macroscopic and holistic constructs referring to all activities in the classroom setting associated with learning and performing on a meta-level. A more comprehensive approach for identifying concrete classroom structures that should foster students’ mastery goals is provided by the multidimensional TARGET framework with its six instructional dimensions ( Task, Autonomy, Recognition, Grouping, Evaluation, Time). However, measurement instruments assessing students’ perceptions of all TARGET dimensions are largely lacking. The main aim of this study was to develop and validate a new student questionnaire for comprehensive assessment of the perceived TARGET classroom structure (the Goal Structure Questionnaire – GSQ). Scales were constructed using a rational-empirical strategy based on classical conceptions of the TARGET dimensions and prior empirical research. The instrument was tested in a study using a sample of 1,080 secondary school students. Findings indicate that the scales are reliable, internally valid, and externally valid in terms of relationships with students’ achievement goals. More concretely, analyses revealed that the TARGET mastery goal structure positively predicts mastery goals, performance approach goals, and an incremental implicit theory of intelligence. No associations were found with performance avoidance goals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?

              This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs. We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes. We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants. The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different conceptual definitions found within the literature. The results indicated that achievement goal-outcome and goal-goal correlations differed significantly depending on the goal scale chosen, the individual items used to assess goal strivings, and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample under study. For example, performance-approach goal scales coded as having a majority of normatively referenced items had a positive correlation with performance outcomes (r = .14), whereas scales with a majority of appearance and evaluative items had a negative relationship (r = -.14). Mastery-approach goal scales that contained goal-relevant language were not significantly related to performance outcomes (r = .05), whereas those that did not contain goal-relevant language had a positive relationship with performance outcomes (r = .14). We concluded that achievement goal researchers are using the same label for conceptually different constructs. This discrepancy between conceptual and operational definitions and the absence of goal-relevant language in achievement goal measures may be preventing productive theory testing, research synthesis, and practical application. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zfp
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2190-8370
                2151-2604
                July 12, 2017
                2017
                : 225
                : 1
                : 64-75
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
                [ 2 ]Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                Marko Lüftenegger, Department of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria, marko.lueftenegger@ 123456univie.ac.at
                Article
                zfp_225_1_64
                10.1027/2151-2604/a000277
                7e7f3fb4-fa64-443b-9d76-37ecd49c6f1d
                Copyright @ 2017
                History
                : November 14, 2016
                : November 26, 2016
                : November 29, 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                achievement goals,TARGET framework,goal structure,classroom,motivation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content266

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors429