11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Household Water InSecurity Experiences (HWISE) Scale: development and validation of a household water insecurity measure for low-income and middle-income countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Progress towards equitable and sufficient water has primarily been measured by population-level data on water availability. However, higher-resolution measures of water accessibility, adequacy, reliability and safety (ie, water insecurity) are needed to understand how problems with water impact health and well-being. Therefore, we developed the Household Water InSecurity Experiences (HWISE) Scale to measure household water insecurity in an equivalent way across disparate cultural and ecological settings.

          Methods

          Cross-sectional surveys were implemented in 8127 households across 28 sites in 23 low-income and middle-income countries. Data collected included 34 items on water insecurity in the prior month; socio-demographics; water acquisition, use and storage; household food insecurity and perceived stress. We retained water insecurity items that were salient and applicable across all sites. We used classical test and item response theories to assess dimensionality, reliability and equivalence. Construct validity was assessed for both individual and pooled sites using random coefficient models.

          Findings

          Twelve items about experiences of household water insecurity were retained. Items showed unidimensionality in factor analyses and were reliable (Cronbach’s alpha 0.84 to 0.93). The average non-invariance rate was 0.03% (threshold <25%), indicating equivalence of measurement and meaning across sites. Predictive, convergent and discriminant validity were also established.

          Conclusions

          The HWISE Scale measures universal experiences of household water insecurity across low-income and middle-income countries. Its development ushers in the ability to quantify the prevalence, causes and consequences of household water insecurity, and can contribute an evidence base for clinical, public health and policy recommendations regarding water.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future

            Water scarcity has become a major constraint to socio-economic development and a threat to livelihood in increasing parts of the world. Since the late 1980s, water scarcity research has attracted much political and public attention. We here review a variety of indicators that have been developed to capture different characteristics of water scarcity. Population, water availability and water use are the key elements of these indicators. Most of the progress made in the last few decades has been on the quantification of water availability and use by applying spatially explicit models. However, challenges remain on appropriate incorporation of green water (soil moisture), water quality, environmental flow requirements, globalization and virtual water trade in water scarcity assessment. Meanwhile, inter- and intra- annual variability of water availability and use also calls for assessing the temporal dimension of water scarcity. It requires concerted efforts of hydrologists, economists, social scientists, and environmental scientists to develop integrated approaches to capture the multi-faceted nature of water scarcity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Water insecurity in 3 dimensions: an anthropological perspective on water and women's psychosocial distress in Ethiopia.

              Water insecurity is a primary underlying determinant of global health disparities. While public health research on water insecurity has focused mainly on two dimensions, water access and adequacy, an anthropological perspective highlights the cultural or lifestyle dimension of water insecurity, and its implications for access/adequacy and for the phenomenology of water insecurity. Recent work in Bolivia has shown that scores on a water insecurity scale derived from ethnographic observations are associated with emotional distress. We extend this line of research by assessing the utility of a locally developed water insecurity scale, compared with standard measures of water access and adequacy, in predicting women's psychosocial distress in Ethiopia. In 2009-2010 we conducted two phases of research. Phase I was mainly qualitative and designed to identify locally relevant experiences of water insecurity, and Phase II used a quantitative survey to test the association between women's reported water insecurity and the Falk Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-F), a measure of psychosocial distress. In multiple regression models controlling for food insecurity and reported quantity of water used, women's water insecurity scores were significantly associated with psychosocial distress. Including controls for time required to collect water and whether water sources were protected did not further predict psychosocial distress. This approach highlights the social dimension of water insecurity, and may be useful for informing and evaluating interventions to improve water supplies. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2019
                29 September 2019
                : 4
                : 5
                : e001750
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentAnthropology , Northwestern University , Evanston, Illinois, USA
                [2 ] departmentNutrition , Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
                [3 ] departmentCenter for Research on Population and Health , American University of Beirut , Beirut, Lebanon
                [4 ] departmentHealth Promotion, Education, and Behavior , University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina, USA
                [5 ] departmentMedicine , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California, USA
                [6 ] departmentSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change , Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona, USA
                [7 ] departmentGeography , Texas A&M University College Station , College Station, Texas, USA
                [8 ] departmentGeography , University of Miami , Coral Gables, Florida, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Sera L Young; sera.young@ 123456northwestern.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-1218
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5898-6966
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-9329
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-856X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-9815
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7936-9123
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-8037
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7693-1376
                Article
                bmjgh-2019-001750
                10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001750
                6768340
                31637027
                7d6be0a7-7bec-4d5c-9e1f-cbca29090059
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 31 May 2019
                : 30 July 2019
                : 18 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: K01 MH098902
                Award ID: R21 MH108444
                Funded by: Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition Actions (IMMANA);
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000169, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences;
                Award ID: BCS-1560962
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000066, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences;
                Award ID: R01 ES1ES019841
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000077, Division of Social and Economic Sciences;
                Award ID: SES-1462086
                Categories
                Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                anthropology,cross-cultural,food insecurity,household water insecurity,scale development,scale validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article