2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Lateropulsion Prevalence After Stroke : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      , , ,
      Neurology
      Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          Lateropulsion is a deficit of active body orientation with respect to gravity in the frontal plane, mostly observed after a stroke. It magnifies mobility limitations and represents an emerging target in rehabilitation. Efforts to design specific interventional studies require some basic knowledge of epidemiology, which is insufficient today because many studies have focused on a few severe forms in individuals called pushers. The objectives of this study were to bridge this gap.

          Methods

          We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Clinical Trials up to 31 May 2021 for original research reporting a prevalence or incidence of poststroke lateropulsion. We followed MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility for inclusion, data extraction, and study quality (Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines) were evaluated by 2 reviewers who used a standardized protocol (PROSPERO; CRD42020175037). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain the pooled prevalence, whose heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis (stroke locations and poststroke phases) and metaregression.

          Results

          We identified 22 studies (5,125 individuals; mean age 68.5 years; 42.6% female; assessed 24 days, on average, after stroke), most published after 2000. The studies' quality was adequate, with only 8 (36.4%) showing risk of bias. The pooled lateropulsion prevalence was 55.1% (95% CI 35.9–74.2) and was consistent across assessment tools. After supratentorial stroke, lateropulsion prevalence was 41% (95% CI 33.5–48.5), and only 12.5% (95% CI 9.2–15.9) in individuals with severe lateropulsion, called pushers. Metaregression did not reveal any effect of age, sex, geographic region, publication year, or study quality. Lateropulsion prevalence progressively decreased from 52.8% (95% CI 40.7–65) in the acute phase to 37% (95% CI 26.3–47.7) in the early subacute phase and 22.8% (95% CI 0–46.3) in the late subacute phase. The ratio of right to left hemispheric stroke with lateropulsion increased as a function of time: 1.7 in the acute phase to 7.7 in the late subacute phase. After infratentorial stroke, lateropulsion prevalence was very high, reaching 83.2% (95% CI 63.9–100.3).

          Discussion

          Poststroke lateropulsion prevalence is high, which appeals for its systematic detection to guide early interventions. Uprightness is predominantly controlled from the right hemisphere.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

            There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review.

              Epidemiological studies, mainly based on Western European surveys, have shown that stroke is more common in men than in women. In recent years, sex-specific data on stroke incidence, prevalence, subtypes, severity and case-fatality have become available from other parts of the world. The purpose of this article is to give a worldwide review on sex differences in stroke epidemiology. We searched PubMed, tables-of-contents, review articles, and reference lists for community-based studies including information on sex differences. In some areas, such as secular trends, ischemic subtypes and stroke severity, noncommunity-based studies were also reviewed. Male/female ratios were calculated. We found 98 articles that contained relevant sex-specific information, including 59 incidence studies from 19 countries and 5 continents. The mean age at first-ever stroke was 68.6 years among men, and 72.9 years among women. Male stroke incidence rate was 33% higher and stroke prevalence was 41% higher than the female, with large variations between age bands and between populations. The incidence rates of brain infarction and intracerebral hemorrhage were higher among men, whereas the rate of subarachnoidal hemorrhage was higher among women, although this difference was not statistically significant. Stroke tended to be more severe in women, with a 1-month case fatality of 24.7% compared with 19.7% for men. Worldwide, stroke is more common among men, but women are more severely ill. The mismatch between the sexes is larger than previously described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurology
                Neurology
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0028-3878
                1526-632X
                April 11 2022
                April 12 2022
                April 12 2022
                February 21 2022
                : 98
                : 15
                : e1574-e1584
                Article
                10.1212/WNL.0000000000200010
                35190465
                7d225920-06ef-48c6-aa6f-93989dbbd0c8
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article