10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of an Equity‐Explicit Student‐Teacher Relationship Intervention for the Ninth‐Grade Transition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          BACKGROUND

          Student‐teacher relationships are associated with the social and emotional climate of a school, a key domain of the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model. Few interventions target student‐teacher relationships during the critical transition to high school, or incorporate strategies for enhancing equitable relationships. We conducted a mixed‐methods feasibility study of a student‐teacher relationship intervention, called Equity‐Explicit Establish‐Maintain‐Restore (E‐EMR).

          METHODS

          We tested whether students (N = 133) whose teachers received E‐EMR training demonstrated improved relationship quality, school belonging, motivation, behavior, and academic outcomes from pre‐ to post‐test, and whether these differences were moderated by race. We also examined how teachers (N = 16) integrated a focus on equity into their implementation of the intervention.

          RESULTS

          Relative to white students, students of the color showed greater improvement on belongingness, behavior, motivation, and GPA. Teachers described how they incorporated a focus on race/ethnicity, culture, and bias into E‐EMR practices, and situated their relationships with students within the contexts of their own identity, the classroom/school context, and broader systems of power and privilege.

          CONCLUSIONS

          We provide preliminary evidence for E‐EMR to change teacher practice and reduce educational disparities for students of color. We discuss implications for other school‐based interventions to integrate an equity‐explicit focus into program content and evaluation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.

            R. Goodman (1997)
            A novel behavioural screening questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), was administered along with Rutter questionnaires to parents and teachers of 403 children drawn from dental and psychiatric clinics. Scores derived from the SDQ and Rutter questionnaires were highly correlated; parent-teacher correlations for the two sets of measures were comparable or favoured the SDQ. The two sets of measures did not differ in their ability to discriminate between psychiatric and dental clinic attenders. These preliminary findings suggest that the SDQ functions as well as the Rutter questionnaires while offering the following additional advantages: a focus on strengths as well as difficulties; better coverage of inattention, peer relationships, and prosocial behaviour; a shorter format; and a single form suitable for both parents and teachers, perhaps thereby increasing parent-teacher correlations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                larissa_gaias@uml.edu
                Journal
                J Sch Health
                J Sch Health
                10.1111/(ISSN)1746-1561
                JOSH
                The Journal of School Health
                Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Malden, USA )
                0022-4391
                1746-1561
                12 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 90
                : 12 , Special Issue ( doiID: 10.1111/josh.v90.12 )
                : 1004-1018
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Assistant Professor, (larissa_gaias@uml.edu), Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway St Lowell, MA 01854
                [ 2 ] Professor, (crcook@umn.edu), College of Education and Human Development University of Minnesota, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455
                [ 3 ] Project Coordinator, (lilliann@utexas.edu), School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training Center University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th St, Seattle, WA 98115
                [ 4 ] Postdoctoral Fellow, (sbrewer1@uw.edu), School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training Center University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th St, Seattle, WA 98115
                [ 5 ] Associate Professor, (ecb41@miami.edu), Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, 1600 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136
                [ 6 ] Project Coordinator, (kichews@uw.edu), School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training Center University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th St, Seattle, WA 98115
                [ 7 ] Research Study Assistant, (sshi@cfchildren.org), Committee for Children, 2815 2nd Ave, Seattle, WA 98121
                [ 8 ] Research Lead/Managing Director, (jjbr@uw.edu), School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training Center University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th St, Seattle, WA 98115
                [ 9 ] Senior Research Scientist, (mduong@cfchildren.org) Committee for Children, 2815 2nd Ave, Seattle, WA 98121
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence to: Larissa M. Gaias, Assistant Professor, ( larissa_gaias@ 123456uml.edu ) Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 850 Broadway St Lowell, MA 01854.
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-3216
                Article
                JOSH12968
                10.1111/josh.12968
                7702116
                33184887
                7bbfd8b2-751d-4ecd-89d7-d41cc36c7a4a
                © 2020 The Authors. Journal of School Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American School Health Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 August 2020
                : 28 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 15, Words: 9381
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000025;
                Award ID: F32MH116623
                Funded by: Institute of Education Sciences , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100005246;
                Award ID: R305A170458
                Award ID: R305B170021
                Categories
                Contributed Article
                Contributed Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.4 mode:remove_FC converted:30.11.2020

                student‐teacher relationships,education equity,implicit bias,transition to high school transition,teacher professional development,school program evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article