39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association Between Early Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Day-60 Mortality in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Related to Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pneumonia

      research-article
      , MD, PhD 1 , 2 , , , MD, PhD 2 , 3 , , MD, PhD 2 , 3 , , MD 4 , , MD, PhD 5 , , MD, PhD 6 , , MD 7 , , PhD 8 , 9 , , MD 10 , , MSc 11 , , MD, PhD 12 , , MD, PhD 13 , , PharmD, PhD 14 , , MD 1 , , MD 15 , , MD, PhD 2 , , MD 16 , , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 2 , 3
      Critical Care Explorations
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, coronavirus disease 2019, critically ill, invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality, noninvasive oxygen support

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          About 5% of patients with coronavirus disease-2019 are admitted to the ICU for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Opinions differ on whether invasive mechanical ventilation should be used as first-line therapy over noninvasive oxygen support. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of early invasive mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease-2019 with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure on day-60 mortality.

          Design:

          Multicenter prospective French observational study.

          Setting:

          Eleven ICUs of the French OutcomeRea network.

          Patients:

          Coronavirus disease-2019 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (Pa o 2/F io 2 ≤ 300 mm Hg), without shock or neurologic failure on ICU admission, and not referred from another ICU or intermediate care unit were included.

          Intervention:

          We compared day-60 mortality in patients who were on invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 2 calendar days of the ICU stay (early invasive mechanical ventilation group) and those who were not (nonearly invasive mechanical ventilation group). We used a Cox proportional-hazard model weighted by inverse probability of early invasive mechanical ventilation to determine the risk of death at day 60.

          Measurement and Main Results:

          The 245 patients included had a median (interquartile range) age of 61 years (52–69 yr), a Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score of 34 mm Hg (26–44 mm Hg), and a Pa o 2/F io 2 of 121 mm Hg (90–174 mm Hg). The rates of ICU-acquired pneumonia, bacteremia, and the ICU length of stay were significantly higher in the early ( n = 117 [48%]) than in the nonearly invasive mechanical ventilation group ( n = 128 [52%]), p < 0.01. Day-60 mortality was 42.7% and 21.9% in the early and nonearly invasive mechanical ventilation groups, respectively. The weighted model showed that early invasive mechanical ventilation increased the risk for day-60 mortality (weighted hazard ratio =1.74; 95% CI, 1.07–2.83, p=0.03).

          Conclusions:

          In ICU patients admitted with coronavirus disease-2019-induced acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, early invasive mechanical ventilation was associated with an increased risk of day-60 mortality. This result needs to be confirmed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

            The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined in 1994 by the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC); since then, issues regarding the reliability and validity of this definition have emerged. Using a consensus process, a panel of experts convened in 2011 (an initiative of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine endorsed by the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine) developed the Berlin Definition, focusing on feasibility, reliability, validity, and objective evaluation of its performance. A draft definition proposed 3 mutually exclusive categories of ARDS based on degree of hypoxemia: mild (200 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg), moderate (100 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg), and severe (PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 100 mm Hg) and 4 ancillary variables for severe ARDS: radiographic severity, respiratory system compliance (≤40 mL/cm H2O), positive end-expiratory pressure (≥10 cm H2O), and corrected expired volume per minute (≥10 L/min). The draft Berlin Definition was empirically evaluated using patient-level meta-analysis of 4188 patients with ARDS from 4 multicenter clinical data sets and 269 patients with ARDS from 3 single-center data sets containing physiologic information. The 4 ancillary variables did not contribute to the predictive validity of severe ARDS for mortality and were removed from the definition. Using the Berlin Definition, stages of mild, moderate, and severe ARDS were associated with increased mortality (27%; 95% CI, 24%-30%; 32%; 95% CI, 29%-34%; and 45%; 95% CI, 42%-48%, respectively; P < .001) and increased median duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors (5 days; interquartile [IQR], 2-11; 7 days; IQR, 4-14; and 9 days; IQR, 5-17, respectively; P < .001). Compared with the AECC definition, the final Berlin Definition had better predictive validity for mortality, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.577 (95% CI, 0.561-0.593) vs 0.536 (95% CI, 0.520-0.553; P < .001). This updated and revised Berlin Definition for ARDS addresses a number of the limitations of the AECC definition. The approach of combining consensus discussions with empirical evaluation may serve as a model to create more accurate, evidence-based, critical illness syndrome definitions and to better inform clinical care, research, and health services planning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.

              To develop and validate a new Simplified Acute Physiology Score, the SAPS II, from a large sample of surgical and medical patients, and to provide a method to convert the score to a probability of hospital mortality. The SAPS II and the probability of hospital mortality were developed and validated using data from consecutive admissions to 137 adult medical and/or surgical intensive care units in 12 countries. The 13,152 patients were randomly divided into developmental (65%) and validation (35%) samples. Patients younger than 18 years, burn patients, coronary care patients, and cardiac surgery patients were excluded. Vital status at hospital discharge. The SAPS II includes only 17 variables: 12 physiology variables, age, type of admission (scheduled surgical, unscheduled surgical, or medical), and three underlying disease variables (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, metastatic cancer, and hematologic malignancy). Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the model performed well in the developmental sample and validated well in an independent sample of patients (P = .883 and P = .104 in the developmental and validation samples, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 in the developmental sample and 0.86 in the validation sample. The SAPS II, based on a large international sample of patients, provides an estimate of the risk of death without having to specify a primary diagnosis. This is a starting point for future evaluation of the efficiency of intensive care units.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care Explor
                Crit Care Explor
                CC9
                Critical Care Explorations
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2639-8028
                22 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 3
                : 1
                : e0329
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Medical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
                [2 ] Université de Paris, UMR 1137, IAME, Paris, France.
                [3 ] AP-HP, Medical and Infectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
                [4 ] Polyvalent ICU, Groupe Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France.
                [5 ] Medical Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France.
                [6 ] Medical Intensive Care Unit, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
                [7 ] Polyvalent ICU, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.
                [8 ] F-CRIN PARTNERS Platform, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
                [9 ] Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, USPC, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
                [10 ] Polyvalent ICU, Centre Hospitalier Sud Essonne Dourdan-Etampes, Étampes, France.
                [11 ] Department of Biostatistics, ICUREsearch, Paris, France.
                [12 ] AP-HP, Epidemiology, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
                [13 ] Medical Intensive Care Unit, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
                [14 ] University Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, HP2, Grenoble, France.
                [15 ] Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, André Mignot Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
                [16 ] AP-HM, Intensive Care Unit, La Timone University Hospital, Marseilles, France.
                Author notes
                For information regarding this article, E-mail: cdupuis1@ 123456chu-clermontferrand.fr
                Article
                00024
                10.1097/CCE.0000000000000329
                7838010
                33521646
                7a3d741a-32ed-45cc-8c78-0af22c73ef10
                Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                acute hypoxemic respiratory failure,coronavirus disease 2019,critically ill,invasive mechanical ventilation,mortality,noninvasive oxygen support

                Comments

                Comment on this article