4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to this journal, click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on measles surveillance in the World Health Organisation African Region, 2020

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries imposed restrictions on public gatherings, health workers were repurposed for COVID-19 response, and public demand for preventive health services declined due to fear of getting COVID-19 in health care settings. These factors led to the disruption in health service delivery, including childhood immunization, in the first months of the pandemic. Measles surveillance supported with laboratory confirmation, is implemented in the African Region as part of the strategies towards attaining measles elimination. World Health Organisation developed guidelines to assist countries to continue to safely provide essential health services including immunization and the surveillance of vaccine preventable diseases during the pandemic.

          Methods

          we analysed the measles case-based surveillance and laboratory databases for the years 2014 to 2020, to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on measles surveillance, comparing the performance in 2020 against the preceding years.

          Results

          the weekly reporting of suspected measles cases declined starting in April 2020. Twelve countries had more than 50% decline in both the number of reported cases as well as in the number of specimens collected in 2020, as compared to the mean for the years 2014-2018. In 2020, only 30% of the specimens from suspected measles cases arrived at the national laboratory within 3 days of collection. At Regional level, 86% of the districts reported suspected measles cases in 2020, while the non-measles febrile rash illness rate was 2.1 per 100,000 population, which was the lowest rate documented since 2014. Only 11 countries met the targets for the two principal surveillance performance indicators in 2020 as compared to an average of 21 countries in the years 2014-2019.

          Conclusion

          the overall quality of measles surveillance has declined during the COVID pandemic in many countries. Countries should implement immediate and proactive measures to revitalise active surveillance for measles and monitor the quality of surveillance. We recommend that countries consider implementing specimen collection and testing methods that can facilitate timely confirmation of suspected measles cases in remote communities and areas with transportation challenges.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit–risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection

          Summary Background National immunisation programmes globally are at risk of suspension due to the severe health system constraints and physical distancing measures in place to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to compare the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa with the risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through visiting routine vaccination service delivery points. Methods We considered a high-impact scenario and a low-impact scenario to approximate the child deaths that could be caused by immunisation coverage reductions during COVID-19 outbreaks. In the high-impact scenario, we used previously reported country-specific child mortality impact estimates of childhood immunisation for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, measles, meningitis A, rubella, and yellow fever to approximate the future deaths averted before 5 years of age by routine childhood vaccination during a 6-month COVID-19 risk period without catch-up campaigns. In the low-impact scenario, we approximated the health benefits of sustaining routine childhood immunisation on only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks during the COVID-19 risk period. We assumed that contact-reducing interventions flattened the outbreak curve during the COVID-19 risk period, that 60% of the population will have been infected by the end of that period, that children can be infected by either vaccinators or during transport, and that upon child infection the whole household will be infected. Country-specific household age structure estimates and age-dependent infection-fatality rates were applied to calculate the number of deaths attributable to the vaccination clinic visits. We present benefit–risk ratios for routine childhood immunisation, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Findings In the high-impact scenario, for every one excess COVID-19 death attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infections acquired during routine vaccination clinic visits, 84 (95% UI 14–267) deaths in children could be prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa. The benefit–risk ratio for the vaccinated children is 85 000 (4900–546 000), for their siblings ( 60 years) is 96 (14–307). In the low-impact scenario that approximates the health benefits to only the child deaths averted from measles outbreaks, the benefit–risk ratio to the households of vaccinated children is 3 (0–10); if the risk to only the vaccinated children is considered, the benefit–risk ratio is 3000 (182–21 000). Interpretation The deaths prevented by sustaining routine childhood immunisation in Africa outweigh the excess risk of COVID-19 deaths associated with vaccination clinic visits, especially for the vaccinated children. Routine childhood immunisation should be sustained in Africa as much as possible, while considering other factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. Funding Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Progress Toward Regional Measles Elimination — Worldwide, 2000–2019

            In 2010, the World Health Assembly (WHA) set the following three milestones for measles control to be achieved by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) among children aged 1 year to ≥90% at the national level and to ≥80% in every district, 2) reduce global annual measles incidence to <5 cases per 1 million population, and 3) reduce global measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate* ( 1 ). In 2012, WHA endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan, † with the objective of eliminating measles § in five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. This report describes progress toward WHA milestones and regional measles elimination during 2000–2019 and updates a previous report ( 2 ). During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 72% to 84% but has since plateaued at 84%–85%. All countries conducted measles surveillance; however, approximately half did not achieve the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Annual reported measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 to 18 cases per 1 million population during 2000–2016; the lowest incidence occurred in 2016, but by 2019 incidence had risen to 120 cases per 1 million population. During 2000–2019, the annual number of estimated measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500; an estimated 25.5 million measles deaths were averted. To drive progress toward the regional measles elimination targets, additional strategies are needed to help countries reach all children with 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve surveillance. Immunization Activities WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) determine vaccination coverage using data from administrative records (calculated by dividing the number of vaccine doses administered by the estimated target population, reported annually) and vaccination coverage surveys, to estimate MCV1 and second dose measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) coverage through routine (i.e., not through mass campaigns) immunization services. ¶ During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased worldwide from 72% to 84%; however, coverage has remained at 84%–85% since 2010, with considerable regional variation (Table 1). TABLE 1 Estimates of coverage with the first and second dose of measles-containing vaccine administered through routine immunization services, reported measles cases, and incidence by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000, 2010, 2016, and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Percentage No. of reported measles cases† Measles incidence per 1 million population†,§ MCV1* coverage Countries with ≥90% MCV1 coverage MCV2* coverage Reporting countries with <5 measles cases per 1 million population African 2000 (46) 53 9 5 8 520,102 836 2010 (46) 73 37 4 30 199,174 232 2016 (47) 69 34 23 51 36,269 37 2019 (47) 69 32 33 34 618,595 567 Americas 2000 (35) 93 63 65 89 1,754 2 2010 (35) 93 74 67 100 247 0.3 2016 (35) 92 66 80 100 97 0.1 2019 (35) 88 71 75 91 19,244 28 Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 71 57 28 17 38,592 90 2010 (21) 77 62 52 40 10,072 17 2016 (21) 82 57 74 55 6,275 10 2019 (21) 82 52 75 42 18,458 27 European 2000 (52) 91 62 48 45 37,421 50 2010 (53) 93 83 80 69 30,625 34 2016 (53) 93 81 88 82 4,440 5 2019 (53) 96 85 91 32 105,755 116 South-East Asia 2000 (10) 63 30 3 0 78,558 51 2010 (11) 83 45 15 36 54,228 30 2016 (11) 89 64 75 27 27,530 14 2019 (11) 94 73 83 30 29,239 15 Western Pacific 2000 (27) 85 48 2 30 177,052 105 2010 (27) 96 63 87 68 49,460 27 2016 (27) 96 63 91 68 57,879 31 2019 (27) 94 67 91 46 78,479 41 Totals 2000 (191) 72 45 18 38 853,479 145 2010 (193) 84 63 42 60 343,806 50 2016 (194) 85 61 67 70 132,490 18 2019 (194) 85 63 71 46 869,770 120 Abbreviations: MCV1 = routine first dose of measles-containing vaccine; MCV2 = routine second dose of measles-containing vaccine. * http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en; data as of July 15, 2020. † http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tsincidencemeasles.html; data as of July 15, 2020. § Population data from United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2020. Any country not reporting data on measles cases for that year was removed from both the numerator and denominator in calculating incidence. Among 194 WHO member states, 122 (63% of member states) achieved ≥90% MCV1 coverage in 2019, a 42% increase from 86 (45%) countries in 2000, but a 4% decrease from a peak of 127 (65%) countries in 2012. In 2019, 42 (22%) countries achieved MCV1 coverage ≥90% nationally and ≥80% in all districts**; however, during that year 19.8 million infants did not receive MCV1 through routine immunization services. The six countries with the highest numbers of infants who had not received MCV1 were Nigeria (3.3 million), Ethiopia (1.5 million), Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), India (1.2 million), and Philippines (0.7 million), accounting for nearly half (48%) of the world’s total. Estimated global MCV2 coverage nearly quadrupled from 18% in 2000 to 71% in 2019, largely because of an 86% increase in the number of countries providing MCV2, from 95 (50%) countries in 2000 to 177 (91%) in 2019 (Table 1). Six countries (Cameroon, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mali, Republic of the Congo, and Togo) introduced MCV2 in 2019. Approximately 204 million persons received MCV during supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) †† in 55 countries in 2019; in addition, 9 million persons received MCV during measles outbreak response activities. Reported Measles Incidence In 2019, all 194 countries conducted measles surveillance, and 193 §§ (99%) had access to standardized quality-controlled laboratory testing through the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. In spite of this, however, surveillance remains weak in many countries, and only 81 (52%) of 157 countries that reported discarded ¶¶ cases achieved the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Countries report the number of incident measles cases*** to WHO and UNICEF annually using the Joint Reporting Form. ††† During 2000–2016, the number of reported measles cases decreased 84%, from 853,479 in 2000 to 132,490 in 2016. From 2000 to 2016, annual measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 cases per 1 million (2000) to 18 (2016), the lowest reported incidence during this period; incidence then increased 567% to 120 per million in 2019, the highest since 2001 (Table 1). The percentage of reporting countries with annual measles incidence of <5 cases per 1 million population increased from 38% (64 of 169) in 2000 to 70% (125 of 179) in 2016, but then decreased to 46% (85 of 184) in 2019. The number of measles cases increased 556% from 132,490 in 2016 to 869,770 in 2019, the most reported cases since 1996. Since 2016, the number of reported measles cases increased 1,606% in WHO’s African Region (AFR), 19,739% in the Region of the Americas (AMR), 194% in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), 2,282% in the European Region (EUR), 6% in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), and 36% in the Western Pacific Region (WPR). In 2019, nine (5%) of 184 reporting countries (Central African Republic, DRC, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Madagascar, North Macedonia, Samoa, Tonga, and Ukraine) experienced large outbreaks, and in each of these countries, reported measles incidence exceeded 500 per 1 million population; these nine countries accounted for 631,847 (73%) of all reported cases worldwide during 2019. Genotypes of viruses isolated from persons with measles were reported by 88 (62%) of 141 countries reporting at least one measles case in 2019. From 2005 to 2019, 20 of 24 recognized measles genotypes were eliminated by immunization activities. The number of genotypes detected decreased from 11 during 2005–2008, to eight during 2009–2014, six in 2016, five in 2017, and four during 2018–2019 ( 3 ). In 2019, among 8,728 reported sequences, 1,920 (22%) were genotype B3; six (0.1%) were D4; 6,774 (78%) were D8; and 28 (0.3%) were H1. §§§ Measles Case and Mortality Estimates A previously described model for estimating measles cases and deaths ( 4 ) was updated with annual vaccination coverage data, case data, and United Nations population estimates for all countries during 2000–2019, enabling derivation of a new series of disease and mortality estimates. For countries with anomalous estimates (e.g., a decrease in reported cases, but an increase in estimated deaths, or vice versa), the model was modified slightly to generate mortality estimates consistent with observed cases. Based on updated annual data, the estimated number of measles cases decreased 65%, from 28,340,700 in 2000 to 9,828,400 in 2019. During this period, estimated annual measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500 (Table 2). During 2000–2019, compared with no measles vaccination, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths globally (Figure). TABLE 2 Estimated number of measles cases and deaths,* by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000 and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Estimated no. of measles cases (95% CI) Estimated no. of measles deaths (95% CI) Estimated % measles mortality reduction from 2000 to 2019 Cumulative no. of measles deaths averted by vaccination, 2000–2019 African 2000 (46) 10,727,500 (7,417,700–17,448,900) 346,400 (227,600–569,000) 57 13,620,000 2019 (47) 4,548,000 (3,266,700–8,376,100) 147,900 (99,500–271,100) Americas 2000 (35) 8,800 (4,400–35,000) NA† NA 102,500 2019 (35) 102,700 (51,400–411,000) NA† Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 2,565,800 (1,534,500–4,774,400) 40,000 (22,200–69,200) 33 2,877,900 2019 (21) 1,384,500 (717,900–3,201,000) 27,000 (14,700–49,500) European 2000 (52) 816,600 (216,900–5,116,000) 350 (100–1,900) 66 101,300 2019 (53) 494,600 (192,800–6,571,400) 120 (20–1,700) South-East Asia 2000 (10) 11,379,100 (8,937,200–15,299,200) 141,400 (102,000–194,600) 80 7,387,800 2019 (11) 2,655,000 (902,200–6,886,500) 28,700 (8,400–75,400) Western Pacific 2000 (27) 2,843,000 (1,934,700–22,297,700) 10,900 (5,200–77,300) 65 1,385,500 2019 (27) 643,700 (127,600–18,007,600) 3,800 (500–75,100) Totals 2000 (191) 28,340,700 (20,045,300–64,971,300) 539,000 (357,200–911,900) 62 25,475,000 2019 (194) 9,828,400 (5,258,500–43,453,500) 207,500 (123,100–472,900) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable; UNICEF = United Nations Children’s Fund. * The measles mortality model used to generate estimated measles cases and deaths is rerun each year using the new and revised annual WHO/UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage (WUENIC) data, as well as updated surveillance data; therefore, the estimated number of cases and mortality estimates in this report might differ slightly from those in previous reports. † Estimated measles mortality was too low to allow reliable measurement of mortality reduction. Regional Verification of Measles Elimination By the end of 2019, no WHO region had achieved and maintained measles elimination; 83 (43%) individual countries had been verified by independent regional commissions as having achieved or maintained measles elimination. The two countries verified in 2019 to have achieved elimination were Iran and Sri Lanka. No AFR country has yet been verified as having eliminated measles. The AMR had achieved verification of measles elimination in 2016; however, endemic measles transmission was reestablished in Venezuela in 2018 and in Brazil in 2019. Discussion Despite substantial decreasing global measles incidence and measles-associated mortality during 2000–2016, the global measles resurgence that commenced during 2017–2018 continued in 2019 and marked a significant step backward in progress toward global measles elimination. Compared with the historic low in reported cases in 2016, reported measles cases increased 556% in 2019, with increases in numbers of reported cases and incidence in all WHO regions. Estimated global measles mortality increased nearly 50% since 2016. In all WHO regions, the fundamental cause of the resurgence was a failure to vaccinate, both in recent and past years, causing immunity gaps in both younger and some older age groups. Lessons can be learned from outbreaks in various countries, as well as from notable successes in countries such as China, Colombia, and India ( 5 – 7 ). Identifying and addressing gaps in population immunity will require additional strategies as outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030 ¶¶¶ and the Measles-Rubella Strategic Framework 2021–2030 ( 8 ). In 2019, the global increase in cases was driven by large outbreaks in several countries. Huge outbreaks occurred in DRC and Madagascar during 2018–2019 as a consequence of accumulations of large numbers of measles-susceptible children, which resulted from longstanding extremely low MCV1 coverage, no introduction of MCV2 into the immunization program, and suboptimal SIA implementation. Samoa’s outbreak resulted from a steady decline in MCV1 and MCV2 coverage during 2014–2018, exacerbated by a decline in vaccine confidence after two infant deaths occurred from an error in measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administration ( 9 ). Ukraine’s outbreak was the result of low vaccine confidence among health care professionals, low demand from the public, and challenges with vaccine supply, storage, and handling.**** Brazil’s outbreak was caused by previously unidentified immunity gaps, revealed by sustained transmission following multiple measles virus importations from the outbreak in neighboring Venezuela. †††† Outbreaks must be investigated to understand whether and why communities were missed by vaccination, so that immunization services can be strengthened to close population immunity gaps. Where low vaccination coverage exists in specific populations, assessment of behavioral and social drivers of low coverage is needed to inform the design and implementation of targeted strategies, whether related to practical factors such as limited access to services, or to social influences that affect confidence and motivation to receive vaccination. Programs need to work to achieve and sustain the trust of parents and communities to ensure understanding that receipt of vaccination is in their children’s best interests. Programs should always be well prepared to respond to any vaccine-related adverse event in a timely and effective manner to obviate fears and hesitancy that can erode progress. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, large differences between estimated and reported incidence indicate overall low surveillance sensitivity, making comparisons between regions difficult to interpret. Second, some countries have multiple measles surveillance systems and choose which data to submit to WHO. In 2019, for example, Chad reported 1,882 cases to WHO from one surveillance system, but another surveillance system identified 26,623 suspected measles cases. Finally, the measles mortality model estimates might be biased upward or downward by inaccurate model inputs, including vaccination coverage and surveillance data. In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has produced increased programmatic challenges, leading to fewer children receiving vaccinations and poorer surveillance ( 10 ). Progress toward measles elimination during and after the pandemic will require strategies to integrate catch-up vaccination policies into essential immunization services, assurance of safe provision of services, engagement with communities to regain trust and confidence in the health system, and rapid outbreak response. As outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030, a global immunization strategy for 2021–2030, further progress toward achieving measles elimination goals will require strengthening essential immunization systems to increase 2-dose coverage, identify and close historical immunity gaps through catch-up vaccination to prevent outbreaks, improve surveillance and preparedness for rapidly responding to outbreaks, and leverage measles as a tracer and guide to improving immunization programs ( 8 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? All six World Health Organization (WHO) regions have a measles elimination goal. What is added by this report? During 2000–2016, annual reported measles incidence decreased globally; however, measles incidence increased in all regions during 2017–2019. Since 2000, estimated measles deaths decreased 62% and measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths worldwide. No WHO region has achieved and maintained measles elimination. What are the implications for public health practice? To achieve regional measles elimination goals, additional strategies are needed to help countries strengthen routine immunization systems, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve case-based surveillance. FIGURE Estimated number of annual measles deaths with vaccination and in the absence of vaccination — worldwide, 2000–2019* * Deaths prevented by vaccination are estimated by the area between estimated deaths with vaccination and those without vaccination (cumulative total of 25.5 million deaths prevented during 2000–2019). Vertical bars represent upper and lower 95% confidence intervals around the point estimate. The figure is a line graph showing the estimated number of annual measles deaths worldwide, during 2000–2019, with and without vaccination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The performance of routine immunization in selected African countries during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic

              Introduction following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020, countries started implementing strict control measures, health workers were re-deployed and health facilities re-purposed to assist COVID-19 control efforts. These measures, along with the public concerns of getting COVID-19, led to a decline in the utilization of regular health services including immunization. Methods we reviewed the administrative routine immunization data from 15 African countries for the period from January 2018 to June 2020 to analyze the trends in the monthly number of children vaccinated with specific antigens, and compare the changes in the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: thirteen of the 15 countries showed a decline in the monthly average number of vaccine doses provided, with 6 countries having more than 10% decline. Nine countries had a lower monthly mean of recipients of first dose measles vaccination in the second quarter of 2020 as compared to the first quarter. Guinea, Nigeria, Ghana, Angola, Gabon, and South Sudan experienced a drop in the monthly number of children vaccinated for DPT3 and/or MCV1 of greater than 2 standard deviations at some point in the second quarter of 2020 as compared to the mean for the months January-June of 2018 and 2019. Conclusion countries with lower immunization coverage in the pre-COVID period experienced larger declines in the number of children vaccinated immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. Prolonged and significant reduction in the number of children vaccinated poses a serious risk for outbreaks such as measles. Countries should monitor coverage trends at national and subnational levels, and undertake catch-up vaccination activities to ensure that children who have missed scheduled vaccines receive them at the earliest possible time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pan Afr Med J
                Pan Afr Med J
                PAMJ
                The Pan African Medical Journal
                The African Field Epidemiology Network
                1937-8688
                08 July 2021
                2021
                : 39
                : 192
                Affiliations
                [1 ]World Health Organisation, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo,
                [2 ]World Health Organisation, Inter-Country Support Team for Western Africa, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso,
                [3 ]World Health Organisation, Inter-Country Support Team for Central Africa, Libreville, Gabon,
                [4 ]World Health Organisation, Inter-Country Support Team for East and Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Balcha Masresha, World Health Organisation, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo. masreshab@ 123456who.int
                Article
                PAMJ-39-192
                10.11604/pamj.2021.39.192.29491
                8464208
                34603573
                74f30569-e2d8-450d-bc7d-9f0a6ede49d1
                Copyright: Balcha Masresha et al.

                The Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 April 2021
                : 17 June 2021
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                vaccine preventable diseases,measles surveillance,rubella,measles laboratory,covid-19,africa
                Medicine
                vaccine preventable diseases, measles surveillance, rubella, measles laboratory, covid-19, africa

                Comments

                Comment on this article