11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      No additional benefit of prescribing a very low-protein diet in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease under regular nephrology care: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , The ERIKA Study Group Investigators of the Italian Society of Nephrology-Conservative Therapy of CKD Work Group
      The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Whether a very low-protein diet supplemented with ketoanalogues (sVLPD), compared with a standard low-protein diet (LPD), improves outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) under stable nephrology care is undefined.

          Objectives

          To compare the effectiveness of sVLPD compared with LPD in patients regularly seen in tertiary nephrology care.

          Methods

          Participants were patients with CKD stages 4–5, followed for at least 6 mo, randomly allocated to receive sVLPD or LPD [0.35 or 0.60 g/kg ideal body weight (IBW)/d, respectively], stratified by center and CKD stage. The primary outcome was time to renal death, defined as the first event between end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were the single components of the primary outcome, cardiovascular outcome, and nutritional status.

          Results

          We analyzed 223 patients (sVLPD, n = 107; LPD, n = 116). Mean age was 64 y, 61% were male, and 35% had diabetes. Median protein intake (PI), which was 0.8 g/kg IBW/d at baseline in both groups, was 0.83 and 0.60 g/kg IBW/d in LPD and sVLPD, respectively, during the trial with a large decrease only in sVLPD (P = 0.011). During a median of 74.2 mo, we recorded 180 renal deaths (141 dialysis and 39 deaths before dialysis). Risk of renal death did not differ in sVLPD compared with LPD (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.57; P = 0.28). No difference was observed for ESRD (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.56; P = 0.51), mortality (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.45; P = 0.82), or time to fatal/nonfatal cardiovascular events (P = 0.2, log-rank test). After 36 mo, still active patients were 45 in sVLPD and 56 in LPD. No change of nutritional status emerged during the study in any arm.

          Conclusions

          This long-term pragmatic trial found that in patients with CKD under stable nephrology care, adherence to protein restriction is low. Prescribing sVLPD compared with standard LPD is safe but does not provide additional advantage to the kidney or patient survival.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0002-9165
                1938-3207
                May 2022
                May 01 2022
                December 30 2021
                May 2022
                May 01 2022
                December 30 2021
                : 115
                : 5
                : 1404-1417
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology, University Hospital “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona,” Salerno, Italy
                [2 ]Medical Statistics Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Naples, Italy
                [3 ]Division of Nephrology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” Naples, Italy
                [4 ]Nephrology Unit, Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
                [5 ]Nephrology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
                [6 ]Nephrology-University Hospital, Salerno
                [7 ]Medical Statistics Unit-University Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” Napoli
                [8 ]Nephrology-University Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli
                [9 ]Nephrology-Moscati Hospital Avellino
                [10 ]Nephrology-Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso
                [11 ]Nephrology-Del Mare Hospital, Napoli
                [12 ]Nephrology-University “Magna Grecia”, Catanzaro
                [13 ]Nephrology-University, Bari
                [14 ]Nephrology-Hospital Brindisi
                [15 ]Nephrology-Hospital Foggia
                [16 ]Nephrology-Hospital Piedimonte Matese
                [17 ]Nephrology-Hospital S. Angelo Lombardi
                Article
                10.1093/ajcn/nqab417
                34967847
                745b5182-6ad2-4fad-be6e-e1ebce41b6d6
                © 2021

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article