5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Relative age and maturation selection biases in academy football

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examined the simultaneous effects of relative age and biological maturity status upon player selection in an English professional soccer academy. A total of 202 players from the U9 to U16 age groups, over an eight-year period (total of 566 observations), had their relative age (birth quarter) and biological maturity (categorised as late, on-time or early maturing based upon the Khamis-Roche method of percentage of predicted adult height at time of observation) recorded. Players born in the first birth quarter of the year (54.8%) were over-represented across all age groups. A selection bias towards players advanced in maturity status for chronological age emerged in U12 players and increased with age; 0% of players in the U15 and U16 age group were categorised as late maturing. A clear maturity selection bias for early maturing players was, however, only apparent when the least conservative criterion for estimating maturity status was applied (53.8% early and 1.9% late maturing in the U16 age group). Professional football academies need to recognise relative age and maturation as independent constructs that exist and operate independently. Thus, separate strategies should perhaps be designed to address the respective selection biases, to better identify, retain and develop players.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer.

          The requirements for soccer play are multifactorial and distinguishing characteristics of elite players can be investigated using multivariate analysis. The aim of the present study was to apply a comprehensive test battery to young players with a view to distinguishing between elite and sub-elite groups on the basis of performance on test items. Thirty-one (16 elite, 15 sub-elite) young players matched for chronological age (15-16 years) and body size were studied. Test items included anthropometric (n = 15), physiological (n = 8), psychological (n = 3) and soccer-specific skills (n = 2) tests. Variables were split into separate groups according to somatotype, body composition, body size, speed, endurance, performance measures, technical skill, anticipation, anxiety and task and ego orientation for purposes of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and stepwise discriminant function analysis. The most discriminating of the measures were agility, sprint time, ego orientation and anticipation skill. The elite players were also significantly leaner, possessed more aerobic power (9.0 +/- 1.7 vs 55.5 +/- 3.8 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and were more tolerant of fatigue (P < 0.05). They were also better at dribbling the ball, but not shooting. We conclude that the test battery used may be useful in establishing baseline reference data for young players being selected onto specialized development programmes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe.

            The potential asymmetries in the birth-date distributions of youth soccer players across ten European countries (2175 age citations) were considered. First, we examined the birth-dates of players representing national youth teams in international competitions. Second, the birth-dates of players representing professional club teams in international youth tournaments were analysed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to assess differences between observed and expected birth-date distributions. Regression analyses were employed to examine the relationship between month of birth and number of players in the different samples. The results showed an over-representation of players born in the first quarter of the selection year (from January to March) for all the national youth selections at the under-15 (U-15), U-16, U-17 and U-18 age categories, as well as for the UEFA U-16 tournaments and Meridian Cup. Players with a greater relative age are more likely to be identified as "talented" because of the likely physical advantages they have over their "younger" peers. Some options for reducing the relative age effect are offered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A multidisciplinary selection model for youth soccer: the Ghent Youth Soccer Project.

              To determine the relationships between physical and performance characteristics and level of skill in youth soccer players aged 12-16 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Sports Sciences
                Journal of Sports Sciences
                Informa UK Limited
                0264-0414
                1466-447X
                June 17 2020
                July 31 2019
                June 17 2020
                : 38
                : 11-12
                : 1359-1367
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department for Health, University of Bath , Bath, UK
                [2 ]Department of Sports Science and Medicine, Southampton Football Club , Southampton, UK
                [3 ]Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin , Texas, USA
                Article
                10.1080/02640414.2019.1649524
                31366286
                62b25bda-c9d2-4c96-b93a-88394c595fa4
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content2,823

                Cited by28

                Most referenced authors441