0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Advancing the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of the NEWgenerator Nonsewered Sanitation System

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Achieving safely managed sanitation and resource recovery in areas that are rural, geographically challenged, or experiencing rapidly increasing population density may not be feasible with centralized facilities due to space requirements, site-specific concerns, and high costs of sewer installation. Nonsewered sanitation (NSS) systems have the potential to provide safely managed sanitation and achieve strict wastewater treatment standards. One such NSS treatment technology is the NEWgenerator, which includes an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), nutrient recovery via ion exchange, and electrochlorination. The system has been shown to achieve robust treatment of real waste for over 100 users, but the technology’s relative life cycle sustainability remains unclear. This study characterizes the financial viability and life cycle environmental impacts of the NEWgenerator and prioritizes opportunities to advance system sustainability through targeted improvements and deployment. The costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the NEWgenerator (general case) leveraging grid electricity were 0.139 [0.113–0.168] USD cap –1 day –1 and 79.7 [55.0–112.3] kg CO 2-equiv cap –1 year –1, respectively. A transition to photovoltaic-generated electricity would increase costs to 0.145 [0.118–0.181] USD cap –1 day –1 but decrease GHG emissions to 56.1 [33.8–86.2] kg CO 2-equiv cap –1 year –1. The deployment location analysis demonstrated reduced median costs for deployment in China (−38%), India (−53%), Senegal (−31%), South Africa (−31%), and Uganda (−35%), but at comparable or increased GHG emissions (−2 to +16%). Targeted improvements revealed the relative change in median cost and GHG emissions to be −21 and −3% if loading is doubled (i.e., doubled users per unit), −30 and −12% with additional sludge drying, and +9 and −25% with the addition of a membrane contactor, respectively, with limited benefits (0–5% reductions) from an alternative photovoltaic battery, low-cost housing, or improved frontend operation. This research demonstrates that the NEWgenerator is a low-cost, low-emission NSS treatment technology with the potential for resource recovery to increase access to safe sanitation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology

            The safe disposal of human excreta is of paramount importance for the health and welfare of populations living in low income countries as well as the prevention of pollution to the surrounding environment. On-site sanitation (OSS) systems are the most numerous means of treating excreta in low income countries, these facilities aim at treating human waste at source and can provide a hygienic and affordable method of waste disposal. However, current OSS systems need improvement and require further research and development. Development of OSS facilities that treat excreta at, or close to, its source require knowledge of the waste stream entering the system. Data regarding the generation rate and the chemical and physical composition of fresh feces and urine was collected from the medical literature as well as the treatability sector. The data were summarized and statistical analysis was used to quantify the major factors that were a significant cause of variability. The impact of this data on biological processes, thermal processes, physical separators, and chemical processes was then assessed. Results showed that the median fecal wet mass production was 128 g/cap/day, with a median dry mass of 29 g/cap/day. Fecal output in healthy individuals was 1.20 defecations per 24 hr period and the main factor affecting fecal mass was the fiber intake of the population. Fecal wet mass values were increased by a factor of 2 in low income countries (high fiber intakes) in comparison to values found in high income countries (low fiber intakes). Feces had a median pH of 6.64 and were composed of 74.6% water. Bacterial biomass is the major component (25–54% of dry solids) of the organic fraction of the feces. Undigested carbohydrate, fiber, protein, and fat comprise the remainder and the amounts depend on diet and diarrhea prevalence in the population. The inorganic component of the feces is primarily undigested dietary elements that also depend on dietary supply. Median urine generation rates were 1.42 L/cap/day with a dry solids content of 59 g/cap/day. Variation in the volume and composition of urine is caused by differences in physical exertion, environmental conditions, as well as water, salt, and high protein intakes. Urine has a pH 6.2 and contains the largest fractions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium released from the body. The urinary excretion of nitrogen was significant (10.98 g/cap/day) with urea the most predominant constituent making up over 50% of total organic solids. The dietary intake of food and fluid is the major cause of variation in both the fecal and urine composition and these variables should always be considered if the generation rate, physical, and chemical composition of feces and urine is to be accurately predicted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ACS Environ Au
                ACS Environ Au
                vg
                aeacc4
                ACS Environmental Au
                American Chemical Society
                2694-2518
                05 May 2023
                19 July 2023
                : 3
                : 4
                : 209-222
                Affiliations
                []Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign , 205 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
                []Institute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign , 1101 W. Peabody Dr., Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
                [§ ]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida , 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Email: jsguest@ 123456illinois.edu . Tel.: +1 (217) 244-9247.
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8600-7235
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-4758
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-0751
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-9179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-3678
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-7319
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4037-2939
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-9657
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-2579
                Article
                10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00001
                10360206
                37483306
                617ece32-fef5-41c1-b177-f87cc2c662e2
                © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

                Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 January 2023
                : 18 April 2023
                : 17 April 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, doi 10.13039/100000865;
                Award ID: INV-008433
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                vg3c00001
                vg3c00001

                nonsewered sanitation (nss) system,qsdsan,multi-unit reinvented toilet (murt),techno-economic analysis (tea),life cycle assessment (lca),decentralized sanitation,on-site sanitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article